📚 A-Level CCEA Economics: Worked Examples Explained | A-Level CCEA 经济:典型例题详解
This article provides a structured walkthrough of typical A-Level Economics questions from the CCEA specification. For each topic, a representative question is broken down into clear, step-by-step explanations, focusing on the application of economic theory, accurate diagrammatic analysis, and effective evaluation. The aim is to equip students with a reliable method for tackling data response and essay-style questions in the examination.
本文为 CCEA 考试局的 A-Level 经济学科目提供典型例题的详尽解析。每个板块选取一道代表性题目,逐步拆解,强调经济理论的实际运用、精准的图表分析以及有效的评估论证,旨在帮助同学们系统掌握数据分析题和论述题的答题方法。
1. Demand and Supply Equilibrium Analysis | 供需均衡分析
Question: Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how a severe drought in a coffee-producing region is likely to affect the equilibrium price and quantity in the global coffee market.
题目:运用供求曲线图,解释咖啡产区的严重干旱会如何影响全球咖啡市场的均衡价格与数量。
Step 1: Identify the initial equilibrium. Draw axes with price on the vertical and quantity on the horizontal. Plot the original demand curve D₁ and supply curve S₁, labelling the equilibrium price P₁ and quantity Q₁. The market is initially in balance where D₁ = S₁.
第一步:确定初始均衡。画出坐标轴,纵轴为价格,横轴为数量。画出原始需求曲线 D₁ 和供给曲线 S₁,标明均衡价格 P₁ 和均衡数量 Q₁。市场最初在 D₁ = S₁ 处达到平衡。
Step 2: Recognise the shock. A drought is a negative supply-side shock for coffee, reducing the harvest. This shifts the supply curve to the left, from S₁ to S₂, because at every given price, producers are able to offer less coffee. The demand curve remains unchanged initially as consumers’ willingness to pay for coffee does not die instantly.
第二步:识别冲击因素。干旱对咖啡来说是负面供给冲击,导致收成减少。这使得供给曲线向左移动,从 S₁ 移至 S₂,因为在任何给定价格下,生产者能够提供的咖啡数量都减少了。需求曲线最初保持不变,因为消费者对咖啡的支付意愿不会立刻消失。
Step 3: Determine the new equilibrium. The leftward shift of supply creates a new intersection with demand D₁. The equilibrium price rises to P₂, while the equilibrium quantity falls to Q₂. Explain that the shortage at the original price puts upward pressure on price, and the higher price chokes off some quantity demanded.
第三步:确定新的均衡点。供给曲线左移后与需求曲线 D₁ 形成新的交点。均衡价格上升至 P₂,均衡数量下降至 Q₂。解释在原来价格下出现的短缺给价格带来上行压力,而上升的价格抑制了部分需求,使数量沿需求曲线收缩。
Step 4: Briefly consider elasticity. If demand for coffee is relatively inelastic (few close substitutes), the price increase will be proportionally larger than the quantity fall. This helps explain why coffee prices can be volatile in response to supply shocks.
第四步:简要考虑弹性因素。如果咖啡的需求相对缺乏弹性(缺少相近替代品),那么价格上升的幅度将大于数量下降的幅度。这有助于解释为何面对供给冲击时咖啡价格波动剧烈。
2. Elasticity Calculations and Interpretations | 弹性计算与解读
Question: The price of a cinema ticket increases from £8 to £10, and weekly attendance falls from 1200 to 1000 customers. Calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) and explain what the value implies for the cinema’s total revenue.
题目:某电影院票价从 8 英镑上涨至 10 英镑,每周观影人次从 1200 下降到 1000。计算需求的价格弹性(PED)并解释该数值对影院总收益的含义。
Step 1: Use the standard PED formula: PED = % change in quantity demanded ÷ % change in price. Start by calculating the percentage changes using the midpoint method for accuracy: %ΔQd = (1000 – 1200) ÷ [(1000 + 1200)÷2] × 100 = -200 ÷ 1100 × 100 = -18.18%. %ΔP = (10 – 8) ÷ [(10 + 8)÷2] × 100 = 2 ÷ 9 × 100 ≈ 22.22%.
第一步:使用标准 PED 公式:PED = 需求量变动百分比 ÷ 价格变动百分比。先采用中点法计算百分比变化以确保准确性:%ΔQd = (1000 – 1200) ÷ [(1000 + 1200)÷2] × 100 = -200 ÷ 1100 × 100 = -18.18%。%ΔP = (10 – 8) ÷ [(10 + 8)÷2] × 100 = 2 ÷ 9 × 100 ≈ 22.22%。
Step 2: Compute PED = -18.18% ÷ 22.22% ≈ -0.82. The negative sign reflects the law of demand, but we generally use the absolute value. Thus |PED| = 0.82, which is less than 1. Demand is price inelastic.
第二步:计算 PED = -18.18% ÷ 22.22% ≈ -0.82。负号反映了需求定律,但我们通常使用绝对值。因此 |PED| = 0.82,小于 1。需求缺乏价格弹性。
Step 3: Interpret total revenue effect. With inelastic demand, a price increase leads to a proportionally smaller drop in quantity, so total revenue (P × Q) rises. Before the price change: TR = £8 × 1200 = £9600. After: TR = £10 × 1000 = £10 000. Total revenue increased by £400, confirming the inelastic relationship.
第三步:解释对总收益的影响。在需求缺乏弹性的情况下,价格上涨导致数量下降的比例较小,因此总收益(P × Q)上升。价格变动前:TR = 8 × 1200 = 9600 英镑。变动后:TR = 10 × 1000 = 10 000 英镑。总收益增加了 400 英镑,印证了这种非弹性关系。
Step 4: Mention limitations. PED may change at different price ranges; the cinema might also need to consider cross-elasticity with streaming services or income elasticity if consumer incomes are changing.
第四步:指出局限性。PED 在不同的价格区间可能发生变化;影院还需要考虑与流媒体服务的交叉弹性,或消费者收入变化带来的收入弹性。
3. Market Failure: Externalities | 市场失灵:外部性
Question: Explain how negative externalities from a coal-fired power plant cause market failure. Use a diagram to illustrate the divergence between private and social costs.
题目:解释燃煤发电厂产生的负外部性如何导致市场失灵,并画图说明私人成本与社会成本之间的差异。
Step 1: Define key terms. Market failure occurs when the free market fails to allocate resources efficiently. A negative externality is a cost imposed on a third party not involved in the production or consumption of the good, such as air pollution from burning coal affecting local residents’ health.
第一步:定义关键术语。市场失灵指自由市场未能有效配置资源。负外部性指生产或消费商品时强加给未参与交易的第三方的成本,例如燃煤产生的空气污染影响当地居民健康。
Step 2: Draw the diagram. Label marginal private cost (MPC) and marginal social cost (MSC). The MSC curve lies above MPC, with the vertical distance equal to the marginal external cost (pollution). Demand represents marginal private benefit (MPB), which equals marginal social benefit (MSB) assuming no consumption externality.
第二步:绘制图表。标出边际私人成本(MPC)与边际社会成本(MSC)。MSC 曲线位于 MPC 上方,垂直距离等于边际外部成本(污染)。需求曲线代表边际私人收益(MPB),在没有消费外部性的情况下等同于边际社会收益(MSB)。
Step 3: Show market equilibrium vs social optimum. The free market settles where MPC = MPB at quantity Q₁. The socially efficient outcome occurs where MSC = MSB at a lower quantity Q₂. The area of deadweight welfare loss between Q₂ and Q₁ reflects the excess social cost over social benefit for those units.
第三步:对比市场均衡与社会最优。自由市场在 MPC=MPB 处达到数量 Q₁。社会有效结果发生在 MSC=MSB 处,对应较低的数量 Q₂。Q₂ 与 Q₁ 之间的无谓福利损失区域表明这些单位的社会成本超过了社会收益。
Step 4: Policy implication. Government can internalise the externality by imposing a tax equal to the marginal external cost. This shifts the MPC curve upward and reduces output towards the socially optimal level.
第四步:政策含义。政府可以通过征收等于边际外部成本的税收将外部性内部化。这使 MPC 曲线上移,将产量降低至接近社会最优水平。
4. Government Intervention: Taxes and Subsidies | 政府干预:税收与补贴
Question: Evaluate the use of a specific tax on sugary drinks to reduce consumption and improve public health.
题目:评估对含糖饮料征收从量税以减少消费并改善公共健康的做法。
Step 1: Explain the mechanism. An indirect tax on sugary drinks shifts the supply curve vertically upwards by the amount of the tax. This raises the market price and reduces the equilibrium quantity, assuming normal demand slopes. A diagram can show the new consumer and producer burdens and the government tax revenue.
第一步:阐述作用机制。对含糖饮料征收间接税使供给曲线垂直上移税额的幅度。这会提高市场价格并减少均衡数量(假设正常的需求曲线)。通过图表可以展示新的消费者负担、生产者负担以及政府税收收入。
Step 2: Analyse effectiveness via PED. The policy is more effective if demand is price elastic. If sugary drinks have many substitutes (diet drinks, water, juice), the PED may be relatively elastic, so a small price rise leads to a large fall in quantity. However, if demand is inelastic due to habit or addiction, consumption falls only slightly.
第二步:通过需求价格弹性分析有效性。如果需求富有弹性,政策效果更强。如果含糖饮料有大量替代品(无糖饮料、水、果汁),PED 可能相对富有弹性,那么小幅涨价会导致数量大幅下降。然而,如果因习惯或上瘾导致需求缺乏弹性,消费量只会轻微减少。
Step 3: Discuss wider effects. The tax is regressive, hitting lower-income households harder as they spend a higher proportion of income on such drinks. There could also be unintended consequences like consumers switching to other unhealthy options. Government revenue raised can be hypothecated for health programmes.
第三步:讨论更广泛的影响。该税具有累退性,对低收入家庭打击更大,因为他们在含糖饮料上的支出占收入的比例更高。还可能存在意外后果,比如消费者转向其他不健康的选择。税收收入可以专款专用于健康项目。
Step 4: Conclusion with evaluation. While a sugar tax can be a useful part of a broader health strategy, its success depends on the size of the tax, the availability of substitutes, and complementary measures such as education and labelling regulations.
第四步:评估性结论。尽管糖税可以成为更广泛的健康战略中有用的一环,但其成功取决于税率大小、替代品的可得性以及教育和标签法规等配套措施。
5. Macroeconomic Objectives and Indicators | 宏观经济目标与指标
Question: Explain how a sustained rise in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) can impact a country’s macroeconomic objectives of price stability and economic growth.
题目:解释消费者价格指数(CPI)持续上升会如何影响一个国家的价格稳定和经济增长这两大宏观经济目标。
Step 1: Define price stability. Price stability is generally defined as a low and stable inflation rate, often targeted around 2% per year by the central bank. A sustained rise in CPI indicates that the general price level of a representative basket of goods and services is increasing, moving beyond the target rate.
第一步:定义价格稳定。价格稳定通常指低而稳定的通货膨胀率,央行常将目标定为每年 2% 左右。CPI 持续上升意味着代表性一篮子商品与服务的总体价格水平在上涨,超出了目标通胀率。
Step 2: Impact on price stability. If CPI persistently exceeds the target, inflationary expectations may become unanchored. Workers demand higher wages to maintain real incomes, triggering a wage-price spiral. This undermines the objective of price stability, erodes purchasing power and can lead to shoe-leather and menu costs.
第二步:对价格稳定的影响。如果 CPI 持续高于目标,通胀预期可能脱锚。工人要求更高工资以维持实际收入,引发工资—物价螺旋上升。这会损害价格稳定目标,侵蚀购买力,并带来皮鞋成本和菜单成本。
Step 3: Impact on economic growth. Moderate demand-pull inflation can initially coincide with growth, but cost-push inflation often squeezes corporate profits and reduces investment. Moreover, high or volatile inflation creates uncertainty, discouraging long-term business planning and foreign investment. Real GDP growth can slow down or turn negative.
第三步:对经济增长的影响。温和的需求拉动型通胀起初可能与增长并存,但成本推动型通胀常常挤压企业利润并减少投资。此外,高通胀或通胀波动会制造不确定性,抑制长期商业规划和外国投资。实际 GDP 增长可能放缓或转为负值。
Step 4: Consider the policy response. Central banks typically raise interest rates to cool aggregate demand. While this helps control inflation, the tighter monetary policy may itself drag on growth in the short run, illustrating the trade-off between the two objectives.
第四步:考虑政策应对。央行通常会提高利率来冷却总需求。虽然这有助于控制通胀,但收紧货币政策本身可能在短期内拖累经济增长,体现了两个目标之间的权衡取舍。
6. Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply | 总需求与总供给
Question: Using an AD/AS diagram, analyse the effects of a significant increase in government spending on infrastructure on real GDP and the price level in the short run and the long run.
题目:运用 AD/AS 模型图分析政府大幅增加基础设施支出在短期和长期对实际 GDP 和价格水平的影响。
Step 1: Draw the initial equilibrium. A standard AD/AS framework: downward-sloping AD, upward-sloping short-run aggregate supply (SRAS), and vertical long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) at the full-employment output Yf. Initial equilibrium at AD₁ = SRAS₁, with price level P₁ and real GDP Y₁, assuming Y₁ is below Yf if the economy has spare capacity.
第一步:画出初始均衡。标准的 AD/AS 框架:向下倾斜的 AD 曲线、向上倾斜的短期总供给曲线(SRAS)以及位于充分就业产出 Yf 处的垂直长期总供给曲线(LRAS)。初始均衡为 AD₁=SRAS₁,价格水平为 P₁,实际 GDP 为 Y₁。若经济存在闲置产能,可假设 Y₁ 低于 Yf。
Step 2: Short-run impact. Higher government spending directly increases aggregate demand, shifting AD₁ to AD₂. The new short-run equilibrium has a higher real GDP (Y₂) and a slightly higher price level (P₂). The extent of the output multiplier depends on the marginal propensity to consume and how much spare capacity exists.
第二步:短期影响。更高的政府支出直接增加总需求,使 AD₁ 右移至 AD₂。新的短期均衡点具有更高的实际 GDP(Y₂)和略微上升的价格水平(P₂)。产出的乘数效应大小取决于边际消费倾向以及经济中存在多少闲置产能。
Step 3: Long-run effects. In the long run, improved infrastructure boosts the economy’s productive capacity, shifting LRAS to the right from Yf to Yf‘. SRAS also shifts rightward as firms benefit from better logistics and lower costs. This can moderate the price level and further increase real GDP, potentially bringing P back towards P₁ while output grows permanently.
第三步:长期影响。在长期,改善的基础设施提升了经济的生产能力,使 LRAS 从 Yf 右移至 Yf‘。随着企业受益于更好的物流和更低的成本,SRAS 也向右移动。这可以平抑价格水平并进一步增加实际 GDP,有可能让物价回落至 P₁ 附近,而产出则永久性增长。
Step 4: Mention crowding out. If the economy is already at full employment, the initial demand boost merely raises prices without increasing real GDP (full crowding out). The exam answer should acknowledge this condition.
第四步:提及挤出效应。如果经济已处于充分就业状态,最初的需求刺激只会推高价格,而不会增加实际 GDP(完全挤出)。答案中应当承认这一前提条件。
7. Fiscal Policy Evaluation | 财政政策评估
Question: Evaluate the effectiveness of expansionary fiscal policy in reducing unemployment in a recession.
题目:评估扩张性财政政策在经济衰退中降低失业的有效性。
Step 1: Explain the transmission mechanism. Expansionary fiscal policy involves either increased government spending or reduced taxation. Higher government expenditure directly boosts AD, while tax cuts raise disposable income and consumption. Both shift AD to the right, raising output and demand for labour, thus reducing cyclical unemployment.
第一步:解释传导机制。扩张性财政政策包括增加政府支出或减税。更高的政府支出直接刺激 AD,而减税则提高可支配收入和消费。两者都使 AD 右移,增加产出和劳动力需求,从而降低周期性失业。
Step 2: Discuss strengths. Automatic stabilisers work quickly without political delay. Discretionary spending on infrastructure can create jobs directly and have a multiplier effect, particularly if targeted at labour-intensive sectors. Fiscal policy is effective when monetary policy is constrained at the zero lower bound of interest rates.
第二步:论述优势。自动稳定器无需政治决策时滞,能迅速发挥作用。针对基础设施的相机抉择支出可以直接创造就业,并产生乘数效应,尤其是当资金投向劳动密集型部门时。当货币政策受限于零利率下限之际,财政政策是有效的。
Step 3: Identify weaknesses. Time lags: recognition lag, decision lag and implementation lag can mean the stimulus arrives after the economy has started recovering. Crowding out: higher government borrowing pushes up interest rates, reducing private investment. Also, a large fiscal deficit may raise fears over government debt sustainability, undermining confidence.
第三步:指出弱点。时滞:认识时滞、决策时滞和执行时滞意味着刺激措施到位时,经济可能已经开始复苏。挤出效应:更高的政府借贷推高利率,减少私人投资。此外,大规模的财政赤字可能引发对政府债务可持续性的担忧,打击市场信心。
Step 4: Judgement. Expansionary fiscal policy can be effective in deep recessions with high spare capacity and low interest rates, but its overall impact depends on the size, timing and composition of the package. A credible exit strategy and coordination with monetary policy strengthens its credibility.
第四步:作出判断。在经济深度衰退、闲置产能高且利率低的情况下,扩张性财政政策可以奏效,但其整体影响取决于刺激方案的规模、时机和构成。可信的退出策略以及与货币政策的协调配合,会增强财政政策的公信力。
8. Monetary Policy Transmission | 货币政策传导
Question: Explain how a central bank’s decision to lower the policy interest rate is transmitted to the real economy and evaluate its limitations.
题目:解释央行下调政策利率的决定如何向实体经济传导,并评估其局限性。
Step 1: Outline the interest rate channel. A cut in the base rate reduces commercial banks’ borrowing cost from the central bank. This is passed on to consumers and businesses through lower loan and mortgage rates. The cost of borrowing falls, stimulating consumption of durable goods and investment spending. AD shifts right.
第一步:概述利率渠道。基准利率下调会降低商业银行向央行借款的成本。这会通过更低的贷款和抵押贷款利率传导给消费者和企业。借款成本下降,刺激耐用消费品支出和投资支出。AD 向右移动。
Step 2: Add the exchange rate channel. Lower interest rates make domestic financial assets less attractive, leading to capital outflows and a depreciation of the currency. A weaker currency makes exports cheaper and imports more expensive, boosting net exports (X – M) and further shifting AD rightward.
第二步:补充汇率传导渠道。较低的利率降低了本币金融资产的吸引力,导致资本外流和本币贬值。本币走弱使出口更便宜、进口更昂贵,从而提振净出口(X-M),进一步推动 AD 右移。
Step 3: Mention the asset price channel. Lower rates push up bond and equity prices, creating a positive wealth effect. Households feel wealthier and increase consumption. Moreover, higher collateral values improve lending conditions, reinforcing the stimulus.
第三步:提及资产价格渠道。降息推高债券和股票价格,产生正财富效应。家庭感到更富有,增加消费。此外,更高的抵押品价值改善了贷款条件,进一步强化刺激效应。
Step 4: Evaluate limitations. The transmission can break down if commercial banks do not pass on rate cuts or if consumer and business confidence is so low that borrowing remains subdued — a liquidity trap scenario. Also, with rates already near zero, further cuts have limited scope. Time lags are long and variable, making precise calibration difficult.
第四步:评估局限性。如果商业银行不传导降息,或者消费者和企业信心极度低迷导致借贷依然疲弱(流动性陷阱情形),传导机制就会失效。此外,当利率已接近零时,进一步降息的空间有限。传导时滞漫长且不确定,难以精确校准。
9. International Trade and Exchange Rates | 国际贸易与汇率
Question: Explain how a depreciation of the pound sterling might improve the UK’s current account balance. Is this outcome guaranteed?
题目:解释英镑贬值如何改善英国的经常账户余额。这一结果是否必然发生?
Step 1: Immediate effect on trade volumes. A depreciation makes exports cheaper in foreign currency terms and imports more expensive in domestic currency terms. If the volume of exports rises and the volume of imports falls sufficiently, the current account improves. Diagram: export and import markets can be illustrated with demand-supply shifts.
第一步:对贸易量的即时影响。贬值使以外币计价的出口商品变得更便宜,以本币计价的进口商品变得更昂贵。如果出口量上升且进口量下降的幅度足够大,经常账户将得到改善。图示:可以用出口市场和进口市场的供需移动来展示。
Step 2: The J-curve effect. In the very short run, trade volumes are sticky due to existing contracts and sluggish consumer responses. The value of net exports may initially worsen because import expenditure rises immediately while export revenue takes time to adjust. The current account worsens before it improves, tracing a J-shaped path over time.
第二步:J 曲线效应。在极短期内,由于已有的合同和缓慢的消费者反应,贸易量具有粘性。净出口价值可能最初恶化,因为进口支出立刻增加,而出口收入需要时间才能调整。经常账户在改善之前会先恶化,随时间呈现 J 形路径。
Step 3: The Marshall-Lerner condition. The current account will only improve in the long run if the sum of the absolute price elasticities of demand for exports and imports is greater than 1 (|PEDX| + |PEDM| > 1). If demand is inelastic, the small volume responses may not compensate for the adverse price changes.
第三步:马歇尔—勒纳条件。只有当出口需求价格弹性和进口需求价格弹性的绝对值之和大于 1(|PEDX| + |PEDM| > 1)时,经常账户在长期才能得到改善。如果需求缺乏弹性,微弱的数量反应可能不足以抵消价格逆向变动的影响。
Step 4: Broader considerations. Domestic inflation caused by imported input costs, rising real wages, or retaliation by trading partners could erode competitiveness gains. Therefore, the outcome is not guaranteed and depends on the specific structure of trade and policy coordination.
第四步:更广泛的考量。由于进口投入品成本上升引发的国内通胀、实际工资上涨或贸易伙伴的报复措施,都可能侵蚀竞争力提升的效果。因此,这一结果并非必然,而取决于具体的贸易结构和政策协调。
10. Evaluation Skills in Essay Questions | 论文题中的评估技巧
Question: “The best way to reduce income inequality is through progressive taxation and increased welfare benefits.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?
题目:“减少收入不平等的最佳途径是累进税制与提高福利金。”你在多大程度上同意这一说法?
Step 1: Define and deconstruct. Income inequality refers to the uneven distribution of income across households. Progressive taxes take a rising proportion of income as income increases; welfare benefits provide a safety net. The claim must be assessed against criteria like efficiency, incentive effects and long-term sustainability.
第一步:定义与拆解。收入不平等指收入在家庭间分配不均。累进税随收入增加而征收更高比例的税金;福利金则提供安全网。这一论断需要依据效率、激励效应和长期可持续性等标准加以评估。
Step 2: Arguments in favour. Progressive taxation directly redistributes from high to low earners, while transfers raise the disposable income of the poorest. The Gini coefficient can be reduced significantly. Examples: Nordic countries combine high tax rates with generous welfare, achieving low inequality. This approach promotes social cohesion and reduces poverty.
第二步:支持论点。累进税将收入直接由高收入者向低收入者再分配,转移支付则提高了最贫困人群的可支配收入。基尼系数可显著降低。例如,北欧国家将高税率与慷慨的福利相结合,实现了较低的不平等。这一做法能促进社会团结并减少贫困。
Step 3: Limitations and counter-arguments. High marginal tax rates can discourage work effort and entrepreneurship, leading to productivity losses and brain drain. Generous benefits risk creating welfare dependency and a poverty trap, where individuals face high effective marginal tax rates if benefits are withdrawn quickly. Furthermore, the cost of welfare can strain public finances and may require higher government debt.
第三步:局限性与反对论点。高边际税率可能抑制工作积极性和创业精神,导致生产率损失和人才外流。慷慨的福利金可能产生福利依赖和贫困陷阱——如果福利金被快速削减,个人将面临极高的有效边际税率。此外,福利支出可能给公共财政带来压力,需要更高的政府债务。
Step 4: Alternative measures. Supply-side policies like education and training can improve earning potential and pre-tax income distribution. Minimum wage legislation and in-work benefits (e.g. tax credits) encourage employment while supporting incomes. A well-designed policy mix is likely more effective and sustainable.
第四步:替代措施。教育、培训等供给侧政策可以提升创收潜力,改善税前收入分配。最低工资立法和在职工资补贴(如税收抵免)可在支持收入的同时鼓励就业。精心设计的政策组合可能更为有效且可持续。
Step 5: Judgement. Progressive taxation and welfare are powerful tools but not ‘the best’ in isolation. Their effectiveness depends on design: moderate progressivity combined with strong investment in human capital and a flexible labour market tends to balance equity and efficiency more successfully.
第五步:综合判断。累进税与福利是强有力的工具,但单独使用并非“最佳”。其有效性取决于设计:适度的累进性配以大力投资人力资本和灵活的劳动力市场,往往能更成功地平衡公平与效率。
Published by TutorHao | Economics Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022(同微信)
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导,国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导Cancel reply