📚 Year 7 CCEA Philosophy: Core Knowledge Revision | 7年级 CCEA 哲学：核心知识点梳理
Philosophy is an exciting subject that encourages Year 7 students to think deeply, ask big questions, and explore different ways of understanding the world. In the CCEA curriculum, core topics include what philosophy is, how to construct arguments, ethical theories such as utilitarianism and deontology, the nature of knowledge, personal identity, free will, and arguments for the existence of God. This guide provides a clear, structured revision of the essential knowledge every student needs to succeed.
哲学是一门令人兴奋的学科，它鼓励7年级学生深入思考、提出重大问题，并探索理解世界的不同方式。在CCEA课程中，核心主题包括哲学的定义、如何构建论证、功利主义与义务论等伦理理论、知识的本质、个人身份、自由意志以及上帝存在的论证。本指南提供了清晰、有组织的知识梳理，帮助每位学生掌握成功所必需的要点。
1. What is Philosophy? | 什么是哲学？
The word ‘philosophy’ comes from the Greek words ‘philo’ (love) and ‘sophia’ (wisdom), meaning ‘the love of wisdom’. Philosophy is the study of fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, and the mind. It encourages us to think critically and not simply accept things at face value.
“哲学”一词源自希腊语“philo”（爱）和“sophia”（智慧），意为“爱智慧”。哲学研究关于存在、知识、价值、理性和心灵的根本问题。它鼓励我们批判性地思考，而不是简单地接受表面现象。
Philosophy is often divided into three main branches: metaphysics (the study of reality), epistemology (the study of knowledge), and ethics (the study of right and wrong). Metaphysics asks, ‘What is real?’ Epistemology asks, ‘How do we know?’ Ethics asks, ‘How should we live?’
哲学通常分为三个主要分支：形而上学（研究现实）、认识论（研究知识）和伦理学（研究对错）。形而上学问：“什么是真实的？”认识论问：“我们如何知道？”伦理学问：“我们应当如何生活？”
2. The Value of Questions | 提问的价值
Philosophy begins with wonder and questioning. The ancient Greek philosopher Socrates famously used a method of asking probing questions to help people examine their beliefs. This is known as the Socratic method.
哲学始于好奇与提问。古希腊哲学家苏格拉底著名地使用深入提问的方法，帮助人们审视自己的信念。这被称为苏格拉底方法。
Asking ‘Why?’ and ‘What do you mean?’ helps to clarify ideas and uncover hidden assumptions. In philosophy, there are no stupid questions – only questions that lead us closer to the truth.
提出“为什么？”和“你是什么意思？”有助于澄清观点并揭示隐藏的假设。在哲学中，没有愚蠢的问题——只有引导我们更接近真相的问题。
3. Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions | 论证、前提与结论
An argument in philosophy is not a quarrel but a set of statements where some (the premises) are intended to support another statement (the conclusion). For example: Premise 1: All humans are mortal. Premise 2: Socrates is a human. Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
哲学中的论证不是争吵，而是一组陈述，其中一些（前提）旨在支持另一陈述（结论）。例如：前提1：所有人都会死。前提2：苏格拉底是人。结论：因此，苏格拉底会死。
A good argument is valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and sound (the premises are true). We evaluate arguments by checking truth and logic.
一个好的论证是有效的（结论从前提中逻辑地得出）且可靠的（前提为真）。我们通过检查真实性和逻辑来评估论证。
4. Logic and Fallacies | 逻辑与谬误
Logic is the study of correct reasoning. In philosophy, we use logical rules to avoid errors in thinking. A fallacy is a common mistake in reasoning that weakens an argument.
逻辑是研究正确推理的学问。在哲学中，我们使用逻辑规则来避免思维错误。谬误是推理中常见的错误，会削弱论证。
Example of a fallacy: Ad hominem – attacking the person instead of their argument. ‘You can’t trust her argument because she’s young.’ This is irrelevant to the truth of the claim.
谬误举例：人身攻击——攻击对方的人而不是论点。“你不能相信她的论证，因为她太年轻。”这与论断的真实性无关。
Another fallacy: Straw man – misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack. Learning fallacies helps us think more clearly.
另一个谬误：稻草人——歪曲某人的论点，使其更容易攻击。学习谬误有助于我们更清晰地思考。
5. Ethical Dilemmas | 伦理困境
Ethics is the branch of philosophy that examines moral values and principles. An ethical dilemma occurs when you have to choose between two or more actions, each of which has moral reasons for and against it.
伦理学是哲学的一个分支，研究道德价值和原则。伦理困境是指你必须在两个或多个行动之间做出选择，而每个行动都有支持和反对的道德理由。
Famous example: The Trolley Problem. A runaway trolley is heading towards five people on the track. You can pull a lever to divert it to a side track with only one person. Should you sacrifice one to save five? This dilemma tests our moral reasoning.
著名例子：电车难题。一辆失控的电车正冲向铁轨上的五个人。你可以拉动控制杆将电车转向另一条只有一个人的轨道。你是否应该牺牲一人来救五人？这个困境考验我们的道德推理。
6. Utilitarianism: The Greatest Good | 功利主义：最大幸福
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. It argues that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.
功利主义是由杰里米·边沁和约翰·斯图尔特·密尔发展的伦理理论。它认为道德上正确的行动是能为最大多数人带来最大幸福的那个行动。
This is a consequentialist theory, meaning it judges actions by their outcomes. If pulling the lever in the Trolley Problem saves more lives, a utilitarian would say you should pull it. However, critics argue it can justify sacrificing individuals for the majority.
这是一种后果主义理论，意味着它通过结果来评判行动。如果拉动电车难题中的杠杆能救更多人，功利主义者会说你应当拉。然而，批评者认为这可能为牺牲少数人成全多数人辩护。
7. Deontology: Duty and Rules | 义务论：责任与规则
Deontology is an ethical theory associated with Immanuel Kant. It focuses on duties and rules rather than consequences. According to Kant, some actions are intrinsically right or wrong, regardless of the outcome.
义务论是与伊曼努尔·康德相关的伦理理论。它关注责任和规则，而非后果。根据康德，某些行为本身就是对或错的，无论结果如何。
Kant’s Categorical Imperative states that we should act only according to rules that could be universal laws. For example, if you consider lying, ask: ‘What if everyone lied?’ If that would lead to a contradiction or a world you wouldn’t want, then lying is wrong.
康德的绝对命令指出，我们只应当按照能够成为普遍法则的准则去行动。例如，如果你考虑撒谎，就问：“如果人人都撒谎会怎样？”如果那会导致矛盾或你不希望的世界，那么撒谎就是错的。
In the Trolley Problem, a deontologist might say it is wrong to actively kill one person, even to save five, because killing is intrinsically wrong. This contrasts with utilitarianism.
在电车难题中，义务论者可能会说，主动杀害一个人是错误的，即使是为了救五个人，因为杀人本身就是错误的。这与功利主义形成对比。
8. What is Knowledge? | 什么是知识？
Epistemology asks: ‘What does it mean to know something?’ A classic definition is that knowledge is justified true belief. You know P if: (1) P is true, (2) you believe P, and (3) you have good reasons (justification) for believing P.
认识论问：“知道某事意味着什么？”一个经典定义是，知识是得到辩护的真信念。你知道命题P，如果：(1) P为真，(2) 你相信P，并且(3) 你有好的理由（辩护）相信P。
However, the philosopher Edmund Gettier presented cases where someone has a justified true belief but still does not seem to have knowledge, leading to deeper debates about the nature of knowledge.
然而，哲学家爱德蒙德·葛梯尔提出了一些案例，其中某人拥有得到辩护的真信念，但似乎仍然没有知识，这引发了关于知识本质的更深入辩论。
Example: You look at a clock that stopped exactly 12 hours ago but unbeknownst to you it still shows the correct time. Your belief that it is 3 o’clock is justified and true, but is it knowledge? This shows the difficulty in defining knowledge.
例子：你看一个钟，它在12小时前停了，但你不知道它仍显示正确的时间。你相信现在是3点，这个信念有辩护且为真，但这算知识吗？这说明定义知识是困难的。
9. Personal Identity: Who Are You? | 个人身份：你是谁？
Personal identity is the philosophical question of what makes you the same person over time. The Ship of Theseus thought experiment illustrates this: if over time every part of a ship is replaced, is it still the same ship?
个人身份是哲学问题，探讨是什么让你随时间保持同一个人的身份。忒修斯之船思想实验说明了这一点：如果一艘船的所有部件随着时间的推移都被替换，它还是同一艘船吗？
Applied to humans, if all the cells in your body are replaced over years, are you still the same person? Theories of personal identity include the bodily continuity theory (same physical body) and the psychological continuity theory (same memories, personality).
应用于人，如果你体内的所有细胞在数年内都被替换，你还是同一个人吗？个人身份理论包括身体连续性理论（同一具肉身）和心理连续性理论（相同的记忆、个性）。
Another key concept: the soul theory, which says a non-physical soul makes you who you are. These ideas connect to questions about life after death.
另一个关键概念：灵魂理论，认为非物质的灵魂决定了你是谁。这些观点关联到死后生命的问题。
10. Does God Exist? The Design Argument | 上帝存在吗？设计论证
The philosophy of religion explores questions about God’s existence. The Design Argument (or Teleological Argument) suggests that the complexity and order in the universe point to an intelligent designer.
宗教哲学探索关于上帝存在的问题。设计论证（或目的论论证）认为，宇宙的复杂性和秩序表明存在一位智慧的设计者。
William Paley’s watchmaker analogy: if you found a watch on the ground, you would infer a watchmaker because of its intricate parts working together for a purpose. Similarly, the universe, with its complex life and laws, appears designed.
威廉·佩利的钟表匠类比：如果你在地上发现一块手表，你会推断存在一位钟表匠，因为其复杂部件协同运作以实现一个目的。同样，宇宙具有复杂的生命和规律，似乎是被设计的。
Critics argue that natural processes like evolution by natural selection can explain apparent design without a designer. This debate encourages critical thinking about evidence and belief.
批评者认为，像自然选择进化这样的自然过程可以在没有设计者的情况下解释表面的设计。这一辩论鼓励对证据和信仰的批判性思考。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导