Year 9 CAIE Law: Vocabulary & Terminology Quick Memory Guide | Year 9 CAIE 法律:词汇术语速记指南

📚 Year 9 CAIE Law: Vocabulary & Terminology Quick Memory Guide | Year 9 CAIE 法律:词汇术语速记指南

Building a strong legal vocabulary is the first step to thinking like a lawyer. In the Year 9 CAIE Law course, you will encounter a wide range of specialised terms that describe how law is made, applied, and enforced. This guide breaks down essential terminology into themed clusters, giving you clear definitions, memorable examples, and bilingual explanations to help you learn faster and retain longer. Whether you are preparing for a class test or laying the foundation for IGCSE Law, mastering these words will sharpen your analysis and boost your confidence.

积累扎实的法律词汇是像律师一样思考的第一步。在 Year 9 CAIE 法律课程中,你会接触到大量描述法律如何制定、适用和执行的专门术语。本指南将核心术语按主题分组,提供清晰的定义、易记的例子和中英双语解释,帮助你学得更快、记得更牢。无论你是在为课堂测验做准备,还是在为 IGCSE 法律打下基础,掌握这些词汇都能让你的分析更敏锐、信心更足。


1. Sources of Law | 法律渊源

Law does not appear out of thin air; it comes from specific sources that a legal system recognises. The most common division is between laws made by Parliament (statute law) and laws developed by judges through court decisions (common law). In England and Wales, Parliament is sovereign, meaning it can make or unmake any law, while judges interpret and apply these statutes but also create binding precedents.

法律并不是凭空出现的;它来源于一个法律体系所承认的特定渊源。最常见的划分是议会制定的法律(成文法)和法官通过判例发展起来的法律(普通法)。在英格兰和威尔士,议会是主权者,意味着它可以制定或废除任何法律,而法官则解释和适用这些成文法,同时也会创造具有约束力的先例。

  • Statute / Act of Parliament: A written law passed by the House of Commons, House of Lords, and given Royal Assent.
  • 成文法 / 议会法案:由下议院、上议院通过并获御准的书面法律。
  • Common law: Law developed by judges through decisions in individual cases, also known as case law or precedent.
  • 普通法:法官在个案判决中发展出来的法律,也称判例法或先例。
  • Precedent: A principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive for a court when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts.
  • 先例:在先前案例中确立的原则或规则,对法院审理类似问题或事实的后案具有约束力或说服力。
  • Legislation: The process of making or enacting statutes; also a collective term for all written laws.
  • 立法:制定或颁布成文法的过程;也作为所有成文法的统称。
  • Delegated legislation: Rules and regulations made by government ministers or other bodies under powers given to them by an Act of Parliament.
  • 授权立法:政府大臣或其他机构根据议会法案授予的权力制定的规则与条例。

2. The Court Hierarchy | 法院层级

The English legal system is built on a strict hierarchy of courts. Higher courts bind lower courts with their decisions, a principle known as stare decisis (let the decision stand). Understanding which court can overrule another is essential for tracing the authority of a precedent. At the top sits the Supreme Court, formerly the House of Lords, and beneath it are the Court of Appeal, High Court, and subordinate courts.

英国法律体系建立在一个严格的法院层级结构之上。上级法院的判决对下级法院具有约束力,这一原则称为“遵循先例”。了解哪个法院可以推翻另一个法院的裁决,对于追溯先例的权威性至关重要。最顶端是最高法院(前身为上议院),其下依次是上诉法院、高等法院和下级法院。

  • Supreme Court: The final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases and criminal cases from England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
  • 最高法院:英国民事案件以及英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰刑事案件的终审上诉法院。
  • Court of Appeal: Divided into Civil and Criminal Divisions; hears appeals from the High Court and Crown Court.
  • 上诉法院:分为民事庭和刑事庭;受理来自高等法院和皇家法院的上诉。
  • High Court: Has three divisions: Queen’s Bench, Chancery, and Family; tries serious civil cases and some criminal appeals.
  • 高等法院:分设三大分庭:王座庭、大法官庭和家事庭;审理重大民事案件和部分刑事上诉。
  • Crown Court: Hears serious criminal cases (indictable offences) and appeals from magistrates.
  • 皇家法院:审理严重刑事案件(可诉罪)以及来自治安法院的上诉。
  • Magistrates’ Court: The lowest criminal court; handles summary offences and committal proceedings.
  • 治安法院:最低级别的刑事法院;处理简易罪和交付审判程序。

3. Criminal Law Basics | 刑法基础

Criminal law deals with conduct considered harmful to society as a whole, and the state prosecutes offenders. To secure a conviction, the prosecution must usually prove both the guilty act (actus reus) and the guilty mind (mens rea) beyond reasonable doubt. The distinction between types of offences—summary, either-way, and indictable—determines where a case will be tried.

刑法处理的是全社会认为有害的行为,由国家起诉违法者。要作出有罪判决,控方通常必须无合理疑点地证明犯罪行为(actus reus)和犯罪意图(mens rea)。简易罪、可选择审判方式的犯罪和可诉罪之间的区别,决定了案件将在哪一级法院审理。

  • Actus reus: The physical element of a crime; the prohibited conduct or omission (e.g., taking money without consent).
  • 犯罪行为:犯罪的客观要素;被禁止的行为或不作为(例如未经同意取走钱财)。
  • Mens rea: The mental element; the state of mind required for a crime, such as intention or recklessness.
  • 犯罪意图:主观要素;犯罪所需的心态,比如故意或轻率。
  • Beyond reasonable doubt: The standard of proof in criminal cases; the prosecution must make the jury sure of the defendant’s guilt.
  • 无合理疑点:刑事案件的证明标准;控方必须让陪审团确信被告有罪。
  • Summary offence: A less serious crime tried only in the Magistrates’ Court (e.g., minor assault).
  • 简易罪:较轻的犯罪,只在治安法院审理(例如轻微伤害)。
  • Indictable offence: A serious crime tried in the Crown Court before a judge and jury (e.g., murder).
  • 可诉罪:在皇家法院由法官和陪审团审理的严重犯罪(例如谋杀)。
  • Either-way offence: A crime that can be tried in either the Magistrates’ Court or the Crown Court (e.g., theft).
  • 可选择审判方式的犯罪:可以在治安法院或皇家法院审理的犯罪(例如盗窃)。

4. Key Criminal Offences | 主要刑事罪名

Year 9 introduces several core offences that illustrate the interplay of actus reus and mens rea. Assault and battery are often confused: assault is causing someone to apprehend immediate unlawful force, while battery is the actual application of that force. Theft requires dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive.

Year 9 课程会介绍几个核心罪名,展示犯罪行为与犯罪意图的相互作用。袭击与殴打经常被混淆:袭击是使他人担心即将遭受非法武力,而殴打则是实际施加那种武力。盗窃罪要求以不诚实的方式侵占属于他人的财产,并意图永久性剥夺。

  • Assault: Intentionally or recklessly causing the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence.
  • 袭击:故意或轻率地使被害人担心会立刻遭受非法人身暴力。
  • Battery: The actual infliction of unlawful force on another person without consent.
  • 殴打:未经同意对他人实际施加非法武力。
  • Theft: Defined in the Theft Act 1968 as dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.
  • 盗窃:1968年《盗窃法》定义为以不诚实的方式侵占属于他人的财产,并意图永久性剥夺该财产。
  • Robbery: Theft aggravated by the use or threat of force immediately before or at the time of stealing.
  • 抢劫:在盗窃即将实施时或实施时使用或威胁使用武力的加重盗窃行为。
  • Murder: The unlawful killing of a reasonable person under the Queen’s peace with malice aforethought, express or implied.
  • 谋杀:在国王治下和平期间,存有明示或暗示的恶意预谋,非法杀害一个有理智的人。

5. Defences in Criminal Law | 刑事抗辩

Even when the prosecution has established the elements of an offence, a defendant may avoid liability by raising a defence. Some defences, like self-defence, justify the conduct; others, like insanity, excuse the defendant due to a lack of capacity. The distinction matters because a successful defence can lead to an acquittal rather than a reduced sentence.

即使控方已经证明了犯罪的各个要素,被告人仍然可以通过提出抗辩来避免承担责任。像正当防卫这样的抗辩理由使行为正当化;而像精神错乱这样的抗辩则因被告缺乏行为能力而给予免责。这一区别之所以重要,是因为成功的抗辩可能带来无罪判决而不是减轻量刑。

  • Self-defence: A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances to protect themselves or another from an imminent attack.
  • 正当防卫:一个人可以使用在当时情况下合理的武力来保护自己或他人免受即将发生的攻击。
  • Duress: A defendant committed a crime because they were threatened with death or serious injury if they refused.
  • 胁迫:被告因受到死亡或严重伤害的威胁而拒绝即会遭殃,从而实施了犯罪。
  • Insanity: A legal defence based on the M’Naghten Rules: at the time of the act, the defendant was labouring under a defect of reason, from a disease of the mind, so as not to know the nature and quality of the act or that it was wrong.
  • 精神错乱:基于麦克诺顿规则的法律抗辩:行为时因精神疾病导致理性缺陷,以至于不知道行为的性质和实质,或不知道它是错误的。
  • Intoxication: Voluntary intoxication is rarely a defence to intent-based crimes but may negate specific intent in some cases; involuntary intoxication may be a full defence.
  • 醉态:自愿陷入醉态很少能作为意图犯罪的抗辩,但在某些情况下可以否定特定意图;非自愿醉态可能成为完全抗辩。

6. Tort Law Overview | 侵权法概述

While criminal law punishes wrongdoing against society, tort law deals with civil wrongs between individuals. The most common tort is negligence, which requires proof that a duty of care was owed, that duty was breached, and that the breach caused foreseeable damage. Other torts include nuisance, defamation, and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.

刑法惩罚的是对全社会的错误行为,而侵权法则处理个人之间的民事过错。最常见的侵权是过失侵权,需要证明存在注意义务、该义务被违反、且该违反造成了可预见的损害。其他侵权还包括妨害、诽谤以及Rylands v Fletcher规则。

  • Tort: A civil wrong (other than breach of contract) that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act.
  • 侵权:一种民事不当行为(非违约),导致索赔人遭受损失或伤害,从而令实施侵权行为人承担法律责任。
  • Negligence: A failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances, causing damage.
  • 过失侵权:未能像一个合理谨慎的人在类似情况下那样行使注意,从而造成损害。
  • Duty of care: A legal obligation to avoid acts or omissions that could foreseeably harm others; established by the neighbour principle from Donoghue v Stevenson.
  • 注意义务:一种避免可预见地损害他人的作为或不作为的法律义务;由Donoghue v Stevenson案中的邻人原则确立。
  • Breach of duty: Failing to meet the standard of care expected of a reasonable person in the defendant’s position.
  • 违反义务:未能达到处于被告位置的合理人所应有的注意标准。
  • Causation: The claimant must show that the defendant’s breach was both a factual cause (but for test) and a legal cause (remoteness) of the damage.
  • 因果关系:索赔人须证明被告的违反既是损害的事实原因(若非测试)也是法律原因(损害的遥远性)。

7. Contract Law Essentials | 合同法基础

A contract is a legally enforceable agreement. For a contract to exist, there must be a clear offer, an unconditional acceptance, consideration (something of value exchanged), and an intention to create legal relations. Contracts can be written, oral, or implied by conduct, but certain types of contracts—such as those for land—must be in writing.

合同是一份具有法律执行力的协议。要使合同成立,必须有明确的要约、无条件的承诺、对价(交换的价值)以及创设法律关系的意图。合同可以是书面的、口头的或者由行为默示成立,但某些类型的合同——例如涉及土地的合同——必须以书面形式订立。

  • Offer: A clear proposal made by the offeror indicating a willingness to be bound on specific terms.
  • 要约:要约人作出的明确提议,表明愿意受具体条款约束。
  • Acceptance: Unconditional agreement to all the terms of the offer, communicated to the offeror.
  • 承诺:对要约全部条款作出的无条件同意,并传达给要约人。
  • Consideration: Something of value given by each party to the contract; it can be a promise, an act, or forbearance.
  • 对价:合同每一方提供的具有价值的东西;可以是一个许诺、一个行为或一种克制的行为。
  • Invitation to treat: Not an offer but an invitation for others to make an offer; displays of goods on a shelf are usually invitations to treat.
  • 要约邀请:不是要约,而是一个邀请他人提出要约的行为;货架上陈列商品通常属于要约邀请。
  • Intention to create legal relations: The parties must intend that their agreement be legally binding; presumptions apply for social/domestic and commercial agreements.
  • 创设法律关系的意图:当事人必须意图使他们的协议具有法律约束力;对社交/家庭协议和商业协议存在不同的推定。

8. Legal Personnel | 法律从业人员

Understanding who does what in the legal system helps you follow a case from start to finish. Solicitors typically provide initial advice and prepare cases, while barristers specialise in advocacy in higher courts. Judges preside over trials and decide points of law, and juries decide questions of fact in serious criminal cases. Lay magistrates are unpaid volunteers who handle the vast majority of less serious criminal work.

了解法律体系中谁做什么,能帮助你从头到尾追踪一起案件。事务律师通常提供初步咨询并准备案件,而出庭律师则专门在高等法院进行讼辩。法官主持审判并决定法律问题,陪审团在重大刑事案件中裁决事实问题。非专业治安法官是不领薪的志愿者,他们处理绝大多数较轻的刑事工作。

  • Barrister: A lawyer who typically specialises in courtroom advocacy and litigation, often instructed by a solicitor.
  • 出庭律师:通常专攻法庭讼辩和诉讼的律师,常由事务律师委托。
  • Solicitor: A qualified legal professional who advises clients, prepares documents, and may represent clients in lower courts.
  • 事务律师:合格的法律专业人士,为客户提供咨询、准备文件,并可在下级法院代理客户。
  • Judge: A public officer appointed to decide cases in a court of law; ensures a fair trial, rules on legal issues, and passes sentence.
  • 法官:被任命在法律法院裁决案件的公职人员;确保公正审判,就法律问题作出裁决并量刑。
  • Jury: A group of 12 randomly selected citizens in England and Wales who decide the facts in serious criminal trials and reach a verdict.
  • 陪审团:英格兰和威尔士随机选出的12名公民组成的小组,在重大刑事审判中裁定事实并作出裁决。
  • Magistrate: A lay person (Justice of the Peace) or a district judge who hears cases in the Magistrates’ Court without a jury.
  • 治安法官:在治安法院无陪审团情况下审理案件的非法律专业者(太平绅士)或地区法官。

9. The Language of Trials | 审判术语

Trials follow a structured process, and precise vocabulary describes each stage. In criminal cases, the prosecution presents its case first, then the defence may make a submission of no case to answer. After all evidence, both sides make closing speeches, and the jury retires to consider its verdict. If the verdict is guilty, the judge passes sentence after considering any mitigation.

审判遵循一个结构化的流程,每个阶段都有精确的词汇来描述。在刑事案件中,控方首先举证,然后辩方可以提出“无需答辩”的请求。全部证据出示完毕后,双方作结案陈词,陪审团退庭商议裁决。如果裁决有罪,法官在考虑任何减轻情节后宣判。

  • Burden of proof: The obligation to prove the facts in issue; in criminal cases, this lies on the prosecution.
  • 举证责任:就争议事实提供证明的义务;在刑事案件中,由控方承担。
  • Standard of proof: The level of certainty required to discharge the burden of proof; ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ in criminal cases, ‘balance of probabilities’ in civil cases.
  • 证明标准:履行举证责任所需的确定程度;刑事案件为“无合理疑点”,民事案件为“盖然性权衡”。
  • Verdict: The formal decision of a jury or magistrate on the guilt or innocence of the defendant.
  • 裁决:陪审团或治安法官对被告有罪或无罪的正式决定。
  • Acquittal: A verdict of not guilty; the defendant is discharged and cannot be retried for the same offence (autrefois acquit).
  • 无罪释放:无罪裁决;被告获释,并不得就同一罪行再次受审(一事不再理)。
  • Sentence: The punishment imposed on a convicted defendant, which may include imprisonment, a fine, or a community order.
  • 判决/量刑:对被定罪的被告施加的惩罚,可能包括监禁、罚款或社区令。

10. Key Latin Phrases | 核心拉丁语短语

Latin is woven into legal English, and Year 9 learners will quickly spot it in textbooks and judgments. These phrases often encapsulate complex legal principles in a few words. Knowing them not only impresses your teacher but also helps you grasp foundational concepts like the requirement of a guilty mind or the principle of precedent.

拉丁语深植于法律英语之中,Year 9 学生很快就能在教科书和判决书中发现它们。这些短语往往用寥寥数语概括复杂的法律原则。了解它们不仅会让你的老师刮目相看,还有助于你把握诸如犯意要求或先例原则等基础概念。

  • Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea: An act does not make a person guilty unless his mind is also guilty (the foundation of criminal liability).
  • Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea:行为不能使人有罪,除非其心态也有罪(刑事责任的基石)。
  • Stare decisis: The doctrine of precedent; to stand by things decided and not disturb settled points.
  • 遵循先例:先例原则;坚守已决之事,不扰乱已确定之处。
  • Ratio decidendi: The reason for the decision; the binding part of a judicial ruling that forms the precedent.
  • 判决理由:裁决的理由;司法判决中具有约束力并构成先例的部分。
  • Obiter dicta (singular: obiter dictum): Remarks made in passing by a judge that are not binding but may be persuasive.
  • 附带意见:法官顺便发表的意见,不具有约束力,但可能具有说服力。
  • Res ipsa loquitur: The facts speak for themselves; used in negligence when the accident would not normally happen without negligence.
  • 事实本身说明问题:事实不言自明;在没有过失通常不会发生事故的情况下,用于过失侵权。
  • Volenti non fit injuria: To one who is willing, no harm is done; a defence to negligence where the claimant consented to the risk.
  • 对自愿者不构成损害:自愿者不受害;一种对过失侵权的抗辩,指索赔人已同意承受该风险。

11. Memory Techniques for Legal Terms | 法律术语记忆技巧

Rote memorisation of definitions rarely works for legal terminology because many words look similar but carry distinct legal consequences. Instead, try linking each term to a vivid story, drawing small diagrams showing relationships (e.g., a flow chart from offer to acceptance to contract), or grouping opposites such as ‘offer’ and ‘invitation to treat’. Flashcards with a term on one side and a simple diagram plus one example on the other can turn passive reading into active recall.

死记硬背定义对法律术语通常收效甚微,因为许多单词看起来相似,但法律后果截然不同。不如尝试把每个术语与一个生动的故事联系起来,画小图展示关系(比如从要约到承诺再到合同的流程图),或者将“要约”和“要约邀请”这样对立的概念分组记忆。一面写术语、另一面画简易图并附一个例子的闪卡,可以把被动阅读转化为主动回忆。

A highly effective method is the ‘Feynman technique’: explain a term aloud in simple English as if teaching a friend who has never studied law. If you get stuck, you have identified a gap. You can also create mnemonics for lists. For the elements of negligence—duty, breach, causation, damage—think ‘Don’t Buy Crackers Daily’, which will bring a smile and stick in your memory far longer than the raw words.

一个高效的方法是“费曼技巧”:用最简单的中文或英文大声解释一个术语,就像在教一个从未学过法律的朋友。如果你卡住了,就说明那里有知识漏洞。你还可以为一系列概念编口诀。比如过失侵权的四要素——注意义务、违反义务、因果关系和损害——可以记成“只因未防损”,这比原始词汇更容易长久记忆。

  • Story linking: Connect ‘assault’ with a scene where someone raises a fist and shouts, ‘I’ll hit you!’ making the victim flinch.
  • 故事联想法:把“袭击”与一个场景联系起来:某人举起拳头大喊“我要打你!”,让受害人畏缩。
  • Opposite pairing: ‘Murder’ (with intent) vs ‘Manslaughter’ (without intent); ‘Offer’ vs ‘Invitation to treat’.
  • 对立配对:“谋杀”(有意图)对比“误杀”(无意图);“要约”对比“要约邀请”。
  • Word roots: ‘Mens’ means mind, ‘rea’ means guilty; ‘actus’ means act, ‘reus’ means guilty.
  • 词根法:“Mens”表示心态,“rea”表示有罪的;“actus”表示行为,“reus”表示有罪的。
  • Flow charts: A simple diagram showing a crime unfolds: Actus reus + Mens rea + no defence = Criminal liability.
  • 流程图:用一个简图展示犯罪的构成:犯罪行为 + 犯罪意图 + 无抗辩理由 = 刑事责任。

12. Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them | 常见错误及避免方法

Even diligent students often confuse ‘assault’ with ‘battery’ because everyday English uses them interchangeably. In law, remember: assault is the threat, battery is the contact. Another trap is mixing up the burden of proof (who must prove) with the standard of proof (how certain they must be). Write a small table in your notes to keep them separate. Also, never assume that all crimes require mens rea—strict liability offences do not require proof of a guilty mind.

就连勤奋的学生也常常把“assault”和“battery”搞混,因为日常英语中它们可以互换。在法律上请记住:assault是威胁,battery是接触。另一个陷阱是把举证责任(谁必须证明)与证明标准(必须达到何种确信程度)混为一谈。在笔记中画个小表格把它们区分开。此外,永远不要假定所有犯罪都需要犯意——严格责任犯罪就不需要证明犯罪心态。

A frequent error in tort essays is stating that the defendant ’caused’ the damage without establishing both factual and legal causation. Learn the ‘but for’ test and the idea of remoteness early. Finally, students sometimes treat obiter dicta as binding law; remember that only the ratio decidendi of a higher court is binding. Using these terms precisely will set your written work apart from the very first assessment.

侵权法论述文中一个常见错误是,只声称被告“造成”了损害,却没有同时证成事实因果关系和法律因果关系。尽早学会“若非”测试和损害的遥远性概念。最后,学生有时会把附带意见当作有约束力的法律;请记住,只有上级法院的判决理由才具有约束力。精准使用这些术语,能让你的书面作业从第一次评估起就脱颖而出。

  • Assault vs battery: Assault = apprehension of force; Battery = actual force.
  • 袭击 vs 殴打:袭击 = 担心遭受武力;殴打 = 实际武力。
  • Burden vs standard: Burden = who; Standard = how sure (criminal: beyond reasonable doubt; civil: balance of probabilities).
  • 举证责任 vs 证明标准:举证责任 = 谁;证明标准 = 达到何种确信(刑事:无合理疑点;民事:盖然性权衡)。
  • Ratio vs obiter: Ratio = binding reason; Obiter = persuasive aside.
  • 判决理由 vs 附带意见:判决理由 = 有约束力的理由;附带意见 = 有说服力的旁论。
  • Murder vs manslaughter: Murder requires malice aforethought; voluntary manslaughter arises when a partial defence (e.g., diminished responsibility) applies.
  • 谋杀 vs 误杀:谋杀要求恶意预谋;当存在减轻责任的局部抗辩时,自愿误杀成立。

Published by TutorHao | Law Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022(同微信)

Comments

屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导,国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from aleveler.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Exit mobile version