📚 CCEA Year 12 Law: Rapid Recall of Key Legal Terms | CCEA 12年级法律核心术语速记指南
Mastering legal vocabulary is the first and most crucial step towards success in CCEA Year 12 Law. Without a solid grasp of the precise terminology, it becomes impossible to analyse case law, interpret statutes, or construct high-scoring answers. This guide provides a structured approach to memorising the essential terms you will encounter, using clear explanations, logical groupings, and memory-friendly techniques.
掌握法律词汇是CCEA 12年级法律取得成功的第一步，也是最关键的一步。如果对精确的术语没有扎实的掌握，就不可能分析判例法、解释成文法或构建高分答案。本指南采用结构化的方法，通过清晰的解释、合理的分组和便于记忆的技巧，帮助你记住需要掌握的核心术语。
1. Sources of Law: Parliament & Precedent | 法律渊源：议会立法与先例
Statute (Act of Parliament) – A written law passed by the Houses of Parliament and receiving Royal Assent. Think of it as the highest form of domestic law, capable of overriding common law. Memory hook: “Statute soars supreme.”
成文法（议会立法） – 由议会两院通过并获得御准的书面法律。它被视为国内法的最高形式，能够推翻普通法。记忆口诀：“成文法，地位高，普通法也能掀翻掉。”
Bill – A proposal for a new law that has not yet been approved. A Bill only becomes an Act after completing all parliamentary stages. Think of a restaurant bill – a proposal before you pay and it becomes a receipt (Act).
法案 – 尚未获得批准的、对新法律的提议。法案只有完成了议会的所有阶段才能成为法律。可以联想餐厅账单——在你付款之前它只是提议，付款后变成收据（法律）。
Royal Assent – The formal consent of the monarch, required for a Bill to become an Act. It is now a formality. Remember: “Royal makes it official.”
御准 – 君主的正式同意，是法案成为法律所必需的步骤。现在这只是一种形式。记住：“御准一下，正式上架。”
Judicial Precedent – A legal principle established by judges in previous cases, which must be followed in later similar cases (stare decisis). This is the backbone of common law. The Latin helps: “stare decisis” means “stand by things decided.”
司法先例 – 法官在先前案件中确立的法律原则，在日后类似案件中必须遵循（遵循先例原则）。这是普通法的支柱。拉丁语“stare decisis”意为“遵照已决事项”。
| Key Latin Term | Meaning & Tip | 关键拉丁词 | 含义与记忆技巧 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stare decisis | “Stand by decided matters” – follow precedent | 遵循先例 | “盯住已定的”——像盯着榜样一样 |
| Ratio decidendi | The reason for the decision – binding part of a judgment | 判决理由 | “决定的根基” – 具有约束力的核心 |
| Obiter dicta | “Things said by the way” – persuasive but not binding | 附论 | “顺带说的话” – 有说服力但无约束力 |
Ratio vs Obiter – Think of a sandwich: the filling (binding) is the ratio, and the surrounding comments (garnish) are obiter. The filling is the essential part; you can have the sandwich without the garnish.
判决理由与附论 – 想象一个三明治：里面的馅料（有约束力）是判决理由，周围的评论（装饰）是附论。馅料是核心部分，没有装饰你照样能吃三明治。
2. Court Hierarchy & Appeals | 法院等级与上诉
Original Jurisdiction – The power of a court to hear a case for the first time (‘trial court’). The Magistrates’ Court and Crown Court often exercise original jurisdiction in criminal matters.
初审管辖权 – 法院首次审理案件的权力（“初审法院”）。地方法院和刑事法院在刑事案件中通常行使初审管辖权。
Appellate Jurisdiction – The power to hear appeals from lower courts. The Court of Appeal and Supreme Court mainly exercise appellate jurisdiction. Use the word “appellate” – sounds like “apple-late” – appeals happen after the first bite (trial).
上诉管辖权 – 审理下级法院上诉的权力。上诉法院和最高法院主要行使上诉管辖权。利用“appellate”发音：像“苹果晚了”——第一口（初审）之后才有上诉。
Binding Precedent – A decision that must be followed by lower courts. The Supreme Court binds all courts below it; the Court of Appeal binds itself and lower courts. Think of a chain linking downwards: Supreme Court at the top, then Court of Appeal, then High Court, etc.
有约束力的先例 – 下级法院必须遵循的判决。最高法院的判决对所有下级法院都有约束力；上诉法院的判决对自身和下级法院有约束力。想象一条向下延伸的锁链：最顶端是最高法院，然后是上诉法院，然后是高等法院等等。
Persuasive Precedent – A decision that a court is not bound to follow but may find convincing. This can come from obiter dicta, decisions of lower courts, or courts in other jurisdictions (e.g. decisions from Australia or Canada in English law).
有说服力的先例 – 法院不必遵循、但可能认为有说服力的判决。可以来自附论、下级法院的判决或其他司法管辖区的法院（例如英国法中的澳大利亚或加拿大判决）。
Overruling – A higher court overturns a legal principle set in a previous case from a lower court. For example, the Supreme Court overrules a Court of Appeal decision. Picture ‘over-ruler’ swatting down a lower court’s judgment.
推翻先例 – 上级法院推翻下级法院在先前案件中确立的法律原则。例如，最高法院推翻上诉法院的判决。想象“上面的尺子”打掉下面的判决。
Reversing – A higher court changes the outcome of a lower court’s decision in the same case on appeal. Don’t confuse with overruling: reversing is changing the result of a case, overruling changes the legal principle for future cases.
改判 – 上级法院在上诉中改变同一案件中下级法院的判决结果。不要与推翻先例混淆：改判改变案件的结果，推翻先例改变未来案件的法律原则。
3. The Legal Profession: Barristers & Solicitors | 法律职业：出庭律师与事务律师
Barrister – A lawyer who specialises in advocacy and appears in court. They often wear wigs and gowns in higher courts. Traditionally, clients cannot directly instruct a barrister; they go through a solicitor. Memory aid: “Barrister at the Bar – they argue.”
出庭律师 – 专注于辩护并在法庭出庭的律师。他们在较高级别法院通常佩戴假发和长袍。传统上，当事人不能直接委托出庭律师，而需通过事务律师。记忆窍门：“出庭律师站法庭——他们来辩论。”
Solicitor – A lawyer who provides legal advice, prepares documents, and traditionally handles client contact. They may appear in lower courts but often instruct barristers. Think: “Solicitor – seen in the office, solicitor of instructions.”
事务律师 – 提供法律咨询、准备文件并传统上负责接待客户的律师。他们可以在下级法院出庭，但通常委托出庭律师。联想：“事务律师坐办公室，接洽事务。”
Queen’s Counsel (QC) – A senior barrister appointed for excellence in advocacy. Now also called King’s Counsel (KC) depending on the monarch. They wear silk gowns, hence ‘taking silk’.
御用大律师 – 因辩护卓越而被任命的资深出庭律师。根据君主性别也称为国王御用大律师。他们穿着丝质长袍，因此有“穿上丝绸”的说法。
Advocacy – The act of arguing a case in court. Barristers are specialists in advocacy. Remember: “ad-voca-cy” sounds like “add voice” – adding your voice in court.
辩护 – 在法庭上为案件进行论证的行为。出庭律师是辩护的专家。记住：“advocacy”听起来像“添加声音”——在法庭上发出你的声音。
4. Criminal Law Essentials: Actus Reus & Mens Rea | 刑法基础：犯罪行为与犯罪意图
Actus Reus – The guilty act. This is the physical element of a crime, which can be an act, an omission (failure to act), or a state of affairs. Latin for “guilty act”. Without actus reus, there is usually no crime. Picture “Act-us Re-us” – the actual act we need.
犯罪行为 – 有罪的行为。这是犯罪的客观要素，可以是作为、不作为（没有履行义务）或特定状态。拉丁语意为“有罪的行为”。没有犯罪行为，通常就不构成犯罪。想象“实际行为”是需要的。
Mens Rea – The guilty mind. This refers to the mental element of a crime, such as intention, recklessness, or negligence. The main forms are direct intent, oblique intent, and recklessness. Think “Men’s Rea-ding” – what’s on the defendant’s mind.
犯罪意图 – 有罪的心理。指犯罪的心理要素，如故意、轻率或疏忽。主要形式有直接故意、间接故意和轻率。想象“人的阅读”——读懂被告在想什么。
Intention (Direct) – The defendant’s aim or purpose to bring about a consequence. It is the highest form of mens rea. Example: A points a gun at B and pulls the trigger wanting to kill B.
直接故意 – 被告人的目的或意图是要引起某种后果。这是最高形式的犯罪意图。例如：甲用枪指着乙并扣动扳机，想要杀死乙。
Oblique Intention – Where the defendant did not directly aim to cause the harm, but the harm was a virtually certain consequence of their actions, and they appreciated this. Often tested with cases like Woollin. Memory phrase: “Indirect but almost inevitable.”
间接故意 – 被告人并非直接追求造成伤害，但伤害是其行为的几乎必然结果，且被告人认识到这一点。常在Woollin案中考查。记忆短语：“不直接，但几乎不可避免。”
Recklessness – Taking an unjustified risk. The defendant is aware of a risk of harm and goes on to take it unreasonably. Tested via Cunningham (subjective recklessness). Think “reck-less” = less care for consequences.
轻率 – 冒不合理的风险。被告人意识到存在伤害的风险，仍然不合理地继续冒险。通过Cunningham案检验（主观轻率）。想象“不顾后果”即较少考虑后果。
5. Criminal Offences: Assault, Battery & Theft | 刑事犯罪：威胁、殴打与盗窃
Assault – Intentionally or recklessly causing the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence. No physical contact is needed – the threat is enough. Picture an “assault” on your senses – a frightening action.
威胁（企图伤害） – 故意或轻率地使被害人担心会立即遭受非法的人身暴力。不需要发生身体接触——威胁就足够了。想象对你的感官的“冲击” – 一个吓人的动作。
Battery – The actual application of unlawful force to another person. Even a mere touch can be battery. Battery = physical contact, assault = fear of contact. Remember the A and B: Assault Before Battery.
殴打 – 对他人实际施加非法武力。即使只是轻微触碰也可能构成殴打。殴打=身体接触，威胁=对接触的恐惧。记住A和B的顺序：先威胁(Assault)后殴打(Battery)。
Theft (s.1 Theft Act 1968) – The dishonest appropriation of property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive. Five key elements: appropriation, property, belonging to another, dishonesty, intention to permanently deprive. Use the mnemonic “A Pink Bunny Dances In” (Appropriation, Property, Belonging to another, Dishonesty, Intention).
盗窃（1968年《盗窃法》第1条） – 不诚实地侵占属于他人的财产，并具有永久剥夺的意图。五个关键要素：侵占、财产、属于他人、不诚实、永久剥夺的意图。使用助记口诀：“粉红兔舞进来”（侵占、财产、属于他人、不诚实、意图）。
Appropriation – Assuming the rights of the owner. This can include taking, selling, keeping or even touching property. It is widely defined. Case: R v Morris.
侵占 – 行使所有者的权利。这可以包括拿走、出售、保留甚至触碰财产。其定义很宽泛。案例：R v Morris案。
Intention to Permanently Deprive – The defendant must intend to treat the property as their own to dispose of regardless of the owner’s rights. Even borrowing can be theft if the property is returned in a substantially changed state (R v Lloyd).
永久剥夺的意图 – 被告人必须意图将财产视为己有、不顾所有者的权利进行处置。即使借用也可能构成盗窃，如果归还时财产状态发生实质性改变（R v Lloyd案）。
6. Tort Law: Negligence & Occupiers’ Liability | 侵权法：过失与占有人责任
Tort – A civil wrong (other than breach of contract) that causes harm or loss, giving rise to a claim for damages. Examples: negligence, nuisance, defamation. “Tort” comes from Latin “tortus” meaning twisted or wrong.
侵权 – 一种民事过错行为（非违约），造成损害或损失，并引发损害赔偿请求权。例如：过失、妨害、诽谤。“Tort”源自拉丁语“tortus”，意为扭曲或错误。
Negligence – The most common tort. To succeed in a claim, the claimant must prove three elements: duty of care, breach of that duty, and damage caused by the breach (causation). Remember “D, B, C” – Don’t Be Careless.
过失 – 最常见的侵权行为。要使索赔成功，原告必须证明三个要素：注意义务、违反该义务以及由此造成的损害（因果关系）。记住“D, B, C” – 不要粗心（Don’t Be Careless）。
Duty of Care – Neighbour Principle – Established in Donoghue v Stevenson: you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who is your neighbour? Persons so closely and directly affected by your act.
注意义务——邻人原则 – 在Donoghue v Stevenson案中确立：你必须采取合理注意，避免那些你可以合理预见可能会伤害邻人的作为或不作为。谁是你的邻人？与你的行为有如此紧密和直接影响的人。
Breach of Duty – Reasonable Man Test – The defendant’s conduct falls below the standard of the reasonable person. Factors: likelihood of harm, seriousness of harm, cost of prevention, social utility. Think: “What would a reasonable person do?”
违反义务——理性人标准 – 被告的行为低于理性人的标准。考量因素：伤害的可能性、伤害的严重性、预防的成本、社会效益。思考：“一个理性人会怎么做？”
Causation – Factual & Legal – The ‘but for’ test for factual causation (but for the defendant’s breach, would the damage have occurred?) and legal causation (no intervening acts break the chain of causation). Important: remoteness of damage (Wagon Mound).
因果关系——事实与法律 – 事实因果关系的“若非”检验（若非被告违反义务，损害会发生吗？）和法律因果关系（无介入行为打断因果链）。重要的是损害的遥远性（Wagon Mound案）。
Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 – Imposes a duty on occupiers of premises to take reasonable care for the safety of lawful visitors. An occupier is someone who has control over the premises. Visitors include invitees, licensees, and those with contractual or statutory right of entry.
1957年占有人责任法 – 对场所占有人施加义务，要求其对合法访客的安全采取合理注意。占有人指对场所有控制权的人。访客包括受邀人、被许可人以及有合同或法定准入权的人。
7. Criminal Trial Courts: Magistrates & Crown | 刑事审判法院：治安法院与刑事法院
Summary Offences – Minor offences tried only in the Magistrates’ Court (e.g. common assault, minor motoring offences). Summary = short trial. Think ‘summarily dealt with’ – quick and simple.
即决罪行 – 仅在治安法院审判的轻微罪行（例如普通威胁、轻微交通犯罪）。即决=简短审理。想象“即决处理”——快速简单。
Indictable Offences – Serious offences triable only in the Crown Court before a judge and jury (e.g. murder, manslaughter, rape). Indictable sounds like “in-dict-able” – a serious indictment.
可起诉罪行 – 仅在刑事法院由法官和陪审团审理的严重罪行（例如谋杀、误杀、强奸）。可起诉听起来像“可被起诉”——一份严重的起诉书。
Either Way Offences – Offences that can be tried either in Magistrates’ Court or Crown Court, depending on the defendant’s plea and mode of trial decision (e.g. theft, burglary). Think: “Either way, justice will be served.”
可任意审判的罪行 – 可在治安法院或刑事法院审判的罪行，取决于被告人的答辩和审判方式决定（例如盗窃、入室盗窃）。想象：“无论哪种方式，正义都将得到伸张。”
Magistrates – Either legally qualified District Judges or lay Justices of the Peace (JPs) who hear cases in the Magistrates’ Court. JPs receive training but are not lawyers. They are the backbone of the criminal justice system.
治安法官 – 包括具有法律资格的区法官和非法律专业的太平绅士（JPs），他们在治安法院审理案件。太平绅士接受培训但不是律师。他们是刑事司法系统的基石。
Jury – A panel of 12 members of the public selected at random to decide the facts of a case in the Crown Court and deliver a verdict based on the evidence. The jury’s role is to determine guilt; the judge directs on the law. “Jury: justice by your peers.”
陪审团 – 随机选出的12位公众成员组成的陪审团，在刑事法院负责根据证据裁决案件事实并作出裁决。陪审团的角色是判定是否有罪；法官指导法律问题。“陪审团：由与你同等地位的人进行审判。”
8. Civil Trial: County Court & High Court | 民事审判：郡法院与高等法院
Claimant – The person bringing a civil claim (formerly called the plaintiff). Claimant claims compensation. Memory: “Claim-ant staking a claim.”
原告 – 提起民事诉讼的人（以前称plaintiff）。原告主张赔偿。记忆：“claim-ant（主张者）提出主张。”
Defendant – The person defending a civil or criminal case. Think: “Defend-ant is the one defending.”
被告 – 在民事或刑事案件中进行辩护的人。记忆：“defend-ant（防御者）是进行防御的一方。”
Balance of Probabilities – The standard of proof in civil cases. The claimant must show that it is more likely than not that the defendant is liable. 51% certainty is sufficient. Picture a pair of scales tipped slightly one way.
盖然性权衡 – 民事案件的证明标准。原告必须证明被告负有责任的可能性大于不可能性。51%的确定性就足够了。想象一个天平略微向一侧倾斜。
Beyond Reasonable Doubt – The standard of proof in criminal cases. The prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt so that the jury or magistrates are sure of guilt. Much higher than civil standard.
排除合理怀疑 – 刑事案件的证明标准。控方必须证明被告人有罪，使得陪审团或治安法官确信无疑。远高于民事标准。
Damages – Monetary compensation awarded to a successful claimant in civil law. Special damages (quantifiable losses) vs general damages (non-monetary losses like pain and suffering).
损害赔偿金 – 判给胜诉原告的金钱补偿。特别损害赔偿金（可量化的损失）与一般损害赔偿金（非金钱损失，如痛苦与折磨）。
9. Statutory Interpretation: The Literal, Golden & Mischief Rules | 成文法解释：字面规则、黄金规则与除弊规则
Literal Rule – Courts give words their plain, ordinary dictionary meaning, even if the result is absurd. This respects parliamentary sovereignty. Example: Whitely v Chappell (dead man cannot vote).
字面规则 – 法院赋予词语其通常的、字典中的含义，即使结果荒谬。这尊重了议会主权。例如：Whitely v Chappell案（死人不能投票）。
Golden Rule – A modification of the literal rule; the court can avoid an absurd result by choosing an alternative meaning of a word. Narrow approach (choice between meanings) or broad approach (modify meaning to avoid repugnant result). Case: R v Allen (bigamy – ‘marry’ meant go through ceremony).
黄金规则 – 对字面规则的修正；法院可通过选择词语的另一种含义来避免荒谬结果。狭义方法（在含义之间选择）或广义方法（修改含义以避免不合情理的结果）。案例：R v Allen案（重婚——“结婚”指举行仪式）。
Mischief Rule – The court looks at the gap or ‘mischief’ in the old law that the statute intended to remedy, and interprets words to suppress the mischief. Four questions from Heydon’s Case. Most purposive of the three traditional rules.
除弊规则 – 法院考察旧法中的漏洞或“弊端”，即制定法意图弥补的缺陷，并解释词语以消除弊端。源自Heydon’s Case的四个问题。是三个传统规则中最具目的性的。
Purposive Approach – Goes beyond the mischief rule; courts look at the overall purpose of the Act and interpret words to give effect to that purpose, even if departing from literal meaning. Widely used with EU-derived law and human rights legislation. Think: “Purpose first, words second.”
目的解释法 – 超越了除弊规则；法院考察立法的整体目的，并解释词语以实现该目的，即使偏离字面含义。广泛用于与欧盟相关的法律和人权立法。思考：“目的优先，字面次之。”
10. Constitutional Cornerstones: Rule of Law & Separation of Powers | 宪法基石：法治与权力分立
Rule of Law – A principle that everyone is subject to the law, including government officials. No one is above the law. Key aspects according to Dicey: supremacy of regular law, equality before the law, and rights are protected by the common law. Memory: “No ruler is above the rule.”
法治 – 一项原则，即每个人都要遵守法律，包括政府官员。没有人凌驾于法律之上。根据戴雪的观点，关键要素是：普通法律的至高无上、法律面前人人平等、权利由普通法保护。记忆：“统治者也不能凌驾于规则之上。”
Separation of Powers – The division of state powers among three branches: the legislature (Parliament – makes law), the executive (Government – administers law), and the judiciary (courts – interprets and enforces law). This prevents concentration of power. Think “Three arms of state keeping each other in check.”
权力分立 – 国家权力在三个分支之间的划分：立法机关（议会——制定法律）、行政机关（政府——执行法律）和司法机关（法院——解释和执行法律）。这防止了权力集中。想象“国家的三只手臂相互制衡”。
Parliamentary Sovereignty – A core constitutional principle: Parliament is the supreme law-making body; it can make or unmake any law, and no person or body can override or set aside its Acts. Courts cannot strike down primary legislation. This is a fundamental concept for CCEA Year 12.
议会主权 – 一项核心宪法原则：议会是最高立法机构；它可以制定或废除任何法律，没有任何人或机构可以推翻或废止其立法。法院不能推翻初级立法。这是CCEA 12年级法律的基础概念。
11. Legal Research & Citation Crash Course | 法律检索与引证速成
Neutral Citation – A unique identifier allocated to a judgment, independent of law reports. Format: [Year] Court Number. Example: [2020] UKSC 25. This helps you locate cases quickly online without needing a law report series.
中立引证 – 分配给判决的唯一识别码，独立于判例汇编。格式：[年份] 法院 编号。例如：[2020] UKSC 25。这有助于你在网上快速定位案例，无需判例汇编系列。
Law Report – Published accounts of judgments, e.g. Appeal Cases (AC), Queen’s Bench (QB), and All England Reports (All ER). The hierarchy: Official Law Reports are the most authoritative. Memory: “AC = Authoritative Content.”
判例汇编 – 判决的公开出版物，例如《上诉案例汇编》（AC）、《王座法庭汇编》（QB）和《全英判例汇编》（All ER）。权威层级：《官方判例汇编》最具权威性。记忆：“AC = 权威内容。”
Ratio & Obiter in Practice – When reading a case, ask: What was the exact legal issue? What did the judge decide as the essential principle to answer that issue? That is the ratio. The rest of the speculative discussion is obiter. Highlighting these in different colours while reading will cement understanding.
判决理由与附论的实际应用 – 阅读案例时，问自己：确切的法律争议点是什么？法官为了解决该争议而确立的根本原则是什么？这就是判决理由。其余的推理性讨论是附论。阅读时用不同颜色高亮这些内容可以巩固理解。
12. Memory Hacks & Exam-Readiness Checklist | 记忆技巧与备考清单
Acronyms & Mnemonics – Create your own for tricky lists. For the five theft elements, we used “A Pink Bunny Dances In”. For negligence: “D-B-C – Don’t Be Careless”. Effective revision is about active recall, not passive reading. Cover a term and try to say its definition out loud.
首字母缩略词与助记法 – 为棘手的列表创建你自己的方法。对于盗窃的五个要素，我们用了“粉红兔舞进来”。对于过失：“D-B-C——不要粗心”。有效的复习是主动回忆，而不是被动阅读。遮住一个术语，试着大声说出其定义。
Flashcard Strategy – Write a legal term on one side, definition and key case on the other. On the reverse, also note the Latin origin if applicable. Review regularly, separating cards into ‘Mastered’, ‘Familiar’, and ‘Needs Work’ piles. This spaced repetition builds long-term memory better than re-reading notes.
闪卡策略 – 一面写上法律术语，另一面写上定义和关键案例。背面如果适用，也注明拉丁语词源。定期复习，将卡片分为“已掌握”、“熟悉”和“需加强”三类。这种间隔重复比重新阅读笔记更能建立长期记忆。
Term – Case Linkage – Many terms are best understood through their landmark case. Build a mental bridge: ‘Neighbour principle’ → Donoghue v Stevenson (snail in bottle). ‘Indirect intent’ → Woollin (baby thrown). Visual imagery strengthens recall.
术语——案例链接 – 许多术语通过标志性案例才能最好理解。建立心理桥梁：“邻人原则”→Donoghue v Stevenson（瓶子里的蜗牛）。“间接故意”→Woollin（抛扔婴儿）。视觉形象能增强记忆。
Key CCEA Checklist – Before the exam, ensure you can define and apply: all Latin terms in the table, Actus Reus / Mens Rea, Ratio / Obiter, binding precedent, negligence duty-breach-causation, the three statutory interpretation rules, civil vs criminal burdens of proof, and court hierarchy. These are building blocks for all essays and scenario questions.
CCEA重点检查清单 – 考试前，确保你能定义并应用：表格中的所有拉丁术语、犯罪行为/犯罪意图、判决理由/附论、有约束力的先例、过失的注意义务-违反-因果关系、成文法的三个解释规则、民事与刑事的证明责任，以及法院等级体系。这些是所有论文题和情景题的基础构件。
Published by TutorHao | Law Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导Cancel reply