📚 Year 11 CCEA Sociology Essay Writing: Frameworks and Model Answers | 11年级CCEA社会学论文写作：框架与范文
Writing a high-scoring essay in CCEA GCSE Sociology is not just about knowing the facts. It is about constructing a logical, evidence-based argument that demonstrates understanding, application, analysis and evaluation – the four cornerstones of the mark scheme. This guide deconstructs the essay-writing process into a clear framework and provides a full model answer so you can see exactly what an examiner is looking for.
在CCEA GCSE社会学考试中取得高分不仅仅需要掌握知识要点，更需要构建一个有逻辑、有证据支撑的论证，以体现理解、应用、分析和评估能力——这些正是评分方案的四大基石。本指南将论文写作过程分解为清晰的框架，并提供完整的范文，让你直观地了解考官究竟期待什么。
1. Understanding the CCEA Sociology Assessment Objectives | 理解CCEA社会学评分目标
Before putting pen to paper, you must know what examiners reward. CCEA GCSE Sociology uses three Assessment Objectives (AOs). AO1 tests your recall and understanding of sociological knowledge. AO2 rewards your ability to apply theories, concepts and evidence to unfamiliar contexts or the question at hand. AO3 demands analysis and evaluation, where you weigh up arguments, make judgements and reach conclusions.
在动笔之前，你必须清楚考官会奖励什么。CCEA GCSE社会学使用三个评分目标。AO1考查你对社会学知识的记忆和理解。AO2奖励你将理论、概念和证据应用于不熟悉的语境或具体问题中的能力。AO3要求分析与评估，即你需要权衡论点、做出判断并得出结论。
| AO | Weighting | What It Means | 中文解释 |
|---|---|---|---|
| AO1 | 35% | Recall, select and communicate knowledge | 回忆、选择和传达知识 |
| AO2 | 40% | Apply knowledge and understanding using sociological concepts | 应用社会学概念展示知识与理解 |
| AO3 | 25% | Analyse and evaluate evidence, arguments and issues | 分析与评估证据、论点和议题 |
Notice that AO2 and AO3 together account for 65% of marks. This means simply describing a theory will never lift you into the top bands. Every paragraph must link evidence back to the question and include a critical edge.
请注意，AO2和AO3合起来占总分的65%。这意味着仅仅描述理论永远无法让你进入高分等级。每个段落都必须将证据与问题联系起来，并包含批判性视角。
2. Deconstructing the Question: Command Words and Key Concepts | 拆解题目：指令词与关键概念
Every CCEA essay question contains a command word that tells you exactly what to do. For example, ‘Discuss’ requires you to explore different sides of an issue and offer a reasoned conclusion. ‘Evaluate’ pushes you to judge the worth of an argument by weighing strengths and weaknesses. ‘Examine’ asks for a detailed breakdown of a topic, often including causes, consequences and theoretical explanations.
每道CCEA论文题都包含一个指令词，它明确告诉你需要做什么。例如，’Discuss’要求你探索问题的不同方面并给出合理的结论；’Evaluate’促使你通过权衡优点和缺点来判断论点的价值；’Examine’要求对主题进行详细分解，通常包括原因、后果和理论解释。
Circle the command word and underline the key sociological concepts in the question, such as ‘nuclear family’, ‘social inequality’ or ‘educational achievement’. Then reframe the question as a debate. If the question is ‘Discuss how far the nuclear family remains the typical family today’, your job is to present evidence for both the continued dominance of the nuclear family and the rise of diverse family forms, before reaching a final judgement.
圈出指令词，并在题目中划出关键的社会学概念，如’核心家庭’、’社会不平等’或’教育成就’。然后将题目重新构建为一场辩论。如果问题是’Discuss how far the nuclear family remains the typical family today’，你的任务就是既提供核心家庭持续占据主导地位的证据，也展示家庭形式多样化的证据，最后作出判断。
3. The 5-Minute Essay Plan: Your Roadmap to Coherence | 五分钟论文计划：你通往连贯性的路线图
In the exam, resist the temptation to start writing immediately. Use the first five minutes to sketch a rough plan. List 4-5 key points you want to make, each representing one body paragraph. Beside each point, jot down the sociologist, theory or study you will use, and a note on how you will evaluate it. Also decide your overall conclusion early – this keeps your argument directed.
在考试中，要抵抗立刻动笔的诱惑。用前五分钟草拟一个大致的计划。列出你想要阐述的4-5个要点，每个要点代表一个主体段落。在每个要点旁边，记下你将使用的社会学家、理论或研究，以及你打算如何对其进行评估。同时尽早确定总体结论——这能确保你的论证始终方向明确。
A typical plan for a family diversity essay might look like this: Paragraph 1 – Functionalist view of the nuclear family (Murdock, Parsons), but its ideological bias. Paragraph 2 – Evidence of family diversity: lone-parent families, statistics from ONS. Paragraph 3 – Postmodernist view: individualisation thesis (Giddens) and pure relationships. Paragraph 4 – Criticisms: cultural and class differences, the modified extended family. Conclusion: the nuclear family remains a powerful ideal but is no longer a statistical norm.
一篇关于家庭多样性论文的典型计划可能如下：第1段——功能主义者的核心家庭观（默多克、帕森斯），但其意识形态偏见；第2段——家庭多样性的证据：单亲家庭、英国国家统计局数据；第3段——后现代主义观点：个体化命题（吉登斯）和纯粹关系；第4段——批判：文化与阶级差异、修正扩展家庭。结论：核心家庭仍是一个强大的理想，但已不再是统计意义上的常态。
4. Crafting a Punchy Introduction | 打造精悍有力的引言
An introduction should do three things: define the key term from the question, outline the debate or differing sociological views, and signpost your own line of argument. Do not waste words on lengthy background that is not directly relevant. A strong opener might read: ‘The concept of the typical family is contested within sociology. While functionalists argue the nuclear family is universal and essential, contemporary evidence points to a far more complex picture of family life in Britain today. This essay will examine arguments for and against the nuclear family’s dominance and conclude that although it remains culturally significant, it no longer reflects the lived reality of most individuals.’
引言应做到三件事：界定题目中的关键术语，概述辩论或不同的社会学观点，并暗示自身的论证路线。不要在冗长且不直接相关的背景上浪费时间。一个有力的开篇可以这样写：’社会学中关于典型家庭的概念存在争议。功能主义者认为核心家庭是普遍且必要的，但当代证据表明，当今英国的家庭生活图景要复杂得多。本文将审视支持和反对核心家庭主导地位的论点，并得出结论：虽然核心家庭在文化上仍然重要，但它已不再反映大多数人的现实生活。’
Notice how this introduction defines, contextualises and hints at a judgement. It also uses sociological language like ‘functionalists’, ‘universal’ and ‘culturally significant’, immediately showing the examiner that you are writing as a sociologist.
请注意，这个引言如何进行了定义、设置了背景并暗示了判断。它还使用了’功能主义者’、’普遍的’和’文化上重要’等社会学语言，立刻向考官表明你正在以社会学家的方式写作。
5. Mastering the PEELE Paragraph Structure | 掌握PEELE段落结构
The core of every high-mark essay is a well-structured paragraph. For CCEA Sociology, use the PEELE model: Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link and Evaluate. First, state your Point (a clear topic sentence that answers the question). Then provide Evidence – name a sociologist, a study, a statistic or a concept. After that, Explain the evidence: what does it show, and why does it matter? Next, Link back to the question explicitly. Finally, add an Evaluate layer, considering the limitations of the evidence or offering a counter-argument.
每篇高分的核心都在于结构良好的段落。针对CCEA社会学，使用PEELE模型：Point（论点）、Evidence（证据）、Explanation（解释）、Link（联系）和Evaluate（评估）。首先陈述你的Point（一个清晰的、回应问题的主题句）。接着提供Evidence——指出一位社会学家、一项研究、一个统计数据或一个概念。然后Explain证据：它说明了什么？为什么重要？下一步明确地Link回问题。最后，加上一个Evaluate层，考虑证据的局限性或提出反论点。
For example: ‘One argument for the continued importance of the nuclear family comes from the functionalist perspective. (Point) Murdock (1949) claimed that the nuclear family performs four essential functions: sexual, reproductive, economic and educational. (Evidence) This suggests the nuclear family is uniquely suited to meet society’s needs for stability and socialisation. (Explanation) Therefore, from this viewpoint, the nuclear family remains vital to social order. (Link) However, feminist sociologists criticise Murdock’s model for assuming a patriarchal division of labour and ignoring the dark side of the family, such as domestic violence. Moreover, modern family forms can equally fulfil these functions. (Evaluate)’
例如：’主张核心家庭持续重要的一个论点来自功能主义视角。（Point）默多克（1949）声称核心家庭履行四项基本功能：性的、生殖的、经济的和教育的。（Evidence）这表明核心家庭特别适合满足社会对稳定性和社会化的需求。（Explanation）因此，从这一观点看，核心家庭对社会秩序依然至关重要。（Link）然而，女性主义社会学家批评默多克的模型预设了一种父权制劳动分工，并忽视了家庭阴暗面，如家庭暴力。此外，现代家庭形式同样可以履行这些功能。（Evaluate）’
6. Embedding Sociological Evidence with Precision | 精准嵌入社会学证据
Simply dropping the name of a sociologist is not enough. You must integrate evidence naturally and with purpose. For AO2 marks, show that you can not only recall a study but also explain its relevance. Instead of writing ‘Parsons said the family has two functions’, write ‘Parsons (1955) identified the irreducible functions of the family as primary socialisation and the stabilisation of adult personalities. This functionalist lens suggests that only the nuclear family can provide the emotional warmth needed for these tasks, reinforcing its presumed superiority.’
仅仅扔出一个社会学家的名字是不够的。你必须自然地、有目的地融入证据。为了获得AO2分数，展示你不仅能够回忆一项研究，还能解释其相关性。与其写’帕森斯说家庭有两种功能’，不如写’帕森斯（1955）指出家庭不可缩减的功能是初级社会化和成人个性的稳定。这一功能主义视角表明，只有核心家庭才能提供这些任务所需的情感温暖，从而强化了其所谓的优越性’。
When using statistics, always cite the source or date: ‘According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS, 2023), 14.9% of families in the UK are lone-parent families, demonstrating significant family diversity.’ This small detail demonstrates academic rigour and pushes your answer into the top band.
在使用统计数据时，务必注明来源或日期：’根据英国国家统计局（ONS, 2023）的数据，英国有14.9%的家庭是单亲家庭，这也显示了显著的家庭多样性。’这个小细节展示了学术严谨性，能将你的答案推向最高分段。
7. Weaving in Sociological Theory Across the Essay | 全文中贯穿社会学理论
CCEA examiners look for sustained theoretical engagement. Do not confine your use of theory to one paragraph. Instead, weave functionalism, Marxism, feminism, interactionism and postmodernism throughout your essay. For a question on social inequality, you might begin by explaining the Marxist view of class polarisation, contrast it with Weber’s multidimensional approach, then bring in feminist theory to show how gender intersects with class, and finally evaluate using the New Right perspective on underclass culture.
CCEA考官寻求持续的理论参与。不要将理论的使用局限在某一个段落中。相反，将功能主义、马克思主义、女性主义、互动主义和后现代主义贯穿全文。对于一个关于社会不平等的问题，你可以先解释马克思主义的阶级分化观，与韦伯的多维方法进行对比，然后引入女性主义理论展示性别与阶级如何交织，最后用新右派关于底层阶级文化的观点进行评估。
This approach demonstrates synoptic understanding and ensures you hit AO2 and AO3 repeatedly. Use phrases like ‘From a Marxist perspective…’, ‘However, interactionists would challenge this by arguing…’, or ‘Postmodernists such as Lyotard reject such meta-narratives entirely.’ Such comparative analysis is gold dust for your marks.
这种方法展示出综合理解，并确保你反复命中AO2和AO3。可以使用这样的短语：’从马克思主义视角看…’，’然而，互动主义者会通过主张…来挑战这一点’，或’像利奥塔这样的后现代主义者完全拒绝这种宏大叙事’。这种比较分析对于得分而言极为宝贵。
8. The Art of Evaluation: Moving Beyond For and Against | 评估的艺术：超越简单的支持与反对
Evaluation does not mean just writing one paragraph for and one paragraph against. True evaluative writing is infused within each paragraph. Consider these layers: the strength of the evidence (is the study outdated or small-scale?); competing explanations (what would another theory say?); the influence of social context (does the evidence apply across different cultures or time periods?); and the extent of the issue (is this true for all social groups?).
评估并不仅仅是写一段支持、再写一段反对。真正的评估性写作渗透在每个段落之中。考虑以下层面：证据的强度（该研究是否过时或规模很小？）；竞争性解释（另一种理论会怎么说？）；社会背景的影响（该证据是否适用于不同的文化或时代？）；以及问题的程度（这对所有社会群体都成立吗？）。
For instance, when discussing the rise of symmetrical families, you might say: ‘Young and Willmott’s (1973) study in London found evidence of more egalitarian conjugal roles. However, Oakley (1974) argued that Young and Willmott’s methodology was flawed because it exaggerated the extent of male domestic participation. Furthermore, later research by British Social Attitudes surveys indicates that women still perform the bulk of housework and childcare, suggesting that the ‘symmetrical family’ remains more aspirational than real.’ This layered evaluation is exactly what top-band answers deliver.
例如，在讨论对称家庭兴起时，你可以说：’扬和威尔莫特（1973）在伦敦的研究发现了更平等夫妻角色的证据。然而，奥克利（1974）认为扬和威尔莫特的研究方法存在缺陷，因为它夸大了男性家务参与的程度。此外，英国社会态度调查的后续研究表明，女性仍然承担着大部分家务和育儿工作，这表明”对称家庭”更多是一种愿望而非现实。’这种层次化评估正是高分答案所呈现的。
9. Linking Back to the Question: Critical Signposting | 回扣问题：关键的导向句
It is alarmingly easy to veer off into a beautifully written paragraph that describes a sociological theory in detail but does not answer the question. Prevent this by ending most paragraphs with a mini-link that explicitly returns to the command word. Ask yourself: ‘So what? How does this help answer the question?’ Use phrases like ‘This shows that…’, ‘Consequently, this challenges the view that…’, or ‘Therefore, the extent to which… is limited because…’.
很容易出现这样的问题：一个精心撰写的段落详细描述了某个社会学理论，却完全没有回答问题。要避免这一点，可以在大多数段落末尾加上一个小小的回扣句，明确返回指令词。问自己：”那又怎样？这如何有助于回答问题？”使用这样的短语：”这表明…”，”因此，这挑战了…的观点”，或”所以，…的程度是有限的，因为…”。
These signpost sentences are not repetitive; they are the connective tissue that transforms a collection of sociological facts into a coherent, sustained argument. Examiners actively look for this to award AO2 and AO3.
这些导向句并非重复，而是将一系列社会学事实转化为连贯、持续论证的结缔组织。考官会积极寻找这些来给AO2和AO3加分。
10. Model Answer: Evaluate the View that the Nuclear Family Is No Longer the Norm in Modern Britain | 范文：评估”核心家庭不再是现代英国的常态”这一观点
Below is a full model essay demonstrating the framework in action. The question is typical of a CCEA GCSE Sociology paper. Read it through and pay attention to how the PEELE structure, theoretical weaving, embedded evidence and evaluation work together.
以下是一篇完整的范文，展示了该框架的实际运用。该题目是CCEA GCSE社会学试卷中的典型题型。通读全文，注意PEELE结构、理论穿插、嵌入证据和评估是如何协同作用的。
Introduction: The nuclear family, traditionally defined as a unit consisting of a married heterosexual couple and their dependent children, has long been held up as the ideal family type in Britain. However, sociologists increasingly question whether this model reflects the diverse reality of contemporary society. This essay will evaluate the view that the nuclear family is no longer the norm, examining functionalist support for its persistence alongside evidence of growing family diversity. Ultimately, it will argue that while the nuclear family retains ideological power, it cannot be considered the empirical norm.
引言：核心家庭，传统上被定义为由一对已婚异性夫妇及其受抚养子女组成的单位，长期以来被推崇为英国的理想家庭类型。然而，社会学家们越来越多地质疑这一模式是否反映了当代社会的多元化现实。本文将评估”核心家庭不再成为常态”这一观点，审视功能主义者对其持续性的支持，以及家庭多样性日益增长的证据。最终，本文将论证，尽管核心家庭仍具有意识形态力量，但它不能被视为经验上的常态。
Body Paragraph 1: Functionalist sociologists maintain that the nuclear family remains both universal and desirable. Murdock (1949) argued that the nuclear family fulfils four essential functions – sexual, reproductive, economic and educational – making it indispensable to social order. Similarly, Parsons (1955) asserted that the nuclear family is uniquely suited to perform primary socialisation and the stabilisation of adult personalities, tasks he deemed vital in modern industrial society. From this perspective, the nuclear family continues to be the cornerstone of social stability, and its prevalence reflects its functional necessity. However, this account is heavily criticised for being ideological rather than evidence-based. Feminists like Oakley (1974) argue that the functionalist model legitimises patriarchal control by presenting the traditional gender division of labour as natural. Moreover, Murdock’s study was based on a narrow sample of western societies, making its claims of universality problematic.
主体段落1：功能主义社会学家坚称核心家庭仍然具有普遍性和可取性。默多克（1949）提出，核心家庭履行着四项基本功能——性的、生殖的、教育的和经济的——使其对社会秩序不可或缺。同样，帕森斯（1955）断言，核心家庭特别适合执行初级社会化和稳定成人个性，这些任务在现代工业社会被其视为至关重要。从这一视角看，核心家族依然是社会稳定的基石，其盛行反映了其功能必要性。然而，这一论述受到严厉批评，被认为更多是意识形态而非循证。像奥克利（1974）这样的女性主义者指出，功能主义模型通过将传统性别分工呈现为自然状态，使得父权控制合法化。此外，默多克的研究样本局限于西方社会，使其普遍性主张站不住脚。
Body Paragraph 2: In stark contrast, a wealth of statistical evidence underscores the decline of the traditional nuclear family as the numerical norm. Data from the Office for National Statistics (2023) reveal that only 35% of families with dependent children in the UK consist of a married couple, down from over 90% in the 1960s. Lone-parent families now account for 14.9% of all families, while cohabiting-couple families have risen sharply. Furthermore, the growth of reconstituted families, same-sex parent families and single-person households demonstrates a diversification of family forms. This empirical shift suggests that the nuclear family is no longer the typical arrangement in which most people live. However, it is important to note that statistics alone do not capture cultural norms. The nuclear family may still be viewed as the ‘ideal’ family, delaying its full demise as a social norm.
主体段落2：与之形成鲜明对比的是，大量统计数据凸显了传统核心家庭作为量化常态的衰落。英国国家统计局（2023）的数据显示，英国有受抚养子女的家庭中，仅35%由已婚夫妇组成，相比1960年代的90%以上大幅下降。单亲家庭现在占所有家庭的14.9%，而同居伴侣家庭则急剧增加。此外，重组家庭、同性家长家庭和单人户的增长展现了家庭形式的多样化。这种实证的转变表明，核心家庭已不是大多数人居住其中的典型安排。然而，重要的是要注意，统计数据本身并不能捕捉文化规范。核心家庭可能仍被视为”理想”家庭，延缓了它作为社会规范的彻底消失。
Body Paragraph 3: Postmodernist theorists argue that family life today is characterised by choice, fluidity and individualisation, further eroding the nuclear family’s dominance. Giddens (1992) introduced the concept of ‘pure relationships’, where individuals seek emotional fulfilment and equality rather than following traditional scripts. Beck and Beck-Gernsheim (1995) describe the ‘do-it-yourself biography’, where people construct their own family paths. These ideas help explain the rise in cohabitation, voluntary childlessness and living apart together (LAT) relationships. Postmodernists celebrate this diversity, suggesting the nuclear family is just one lifestyle option among many. Yet, critics point out that not everyone has equal access to these choices. Chester (1985) argued that the ‘neo-conventional family’ remains dominant because many diverse family forms are, in reality, temporary transitions or variations on the nuclear family model. Therefore, the extent of genuine diversity may be overstated by postmodernists.
主体段落3：后现代主义理论家认为，当今的家庭生活以选择、流动性和个体化为特征，进一步侵蚀了核心家庭的主导地位。吉登斯（1992）引入了”纯粹关系”的概念，即个人寻求情感满足和平等，而不是遵循传统脚本。贝克和贝克-格恩斯海姆（1995）描述了”自助式传记”，即人们构建自己的家庭路径。这些理念有助于解释同居、自愿无子女和分开同居关系（LAT）的增加。后现代主义者为这种多样性欢呼，认为核心家庭只是众多生活方式选择中的一种。然而，批评者指出，并非所有人都能平等地获得这些选择。切斯特（1985）认为，”新传统家庭”仍然占主导地位，因为许多多元家庭形式在现实中只是核心家庭模式的暂时过渡或变体。因此，后现代主义者可能高估了真正多元化的程度。
Conclusion: In conclusion, the view that the nuclear family is no longer the norm is supported by compelling statistical and theoretical evidence. The functionalist defence of its natural indispensability is weakened by ideological critique and empirical change. While the nuclear family remains a powerful cultural ideal and a reference point for policy, it has lost its position as the statistical and experiential norm for a growing majority of the population. The reality of British family life is now best described as pluralistic and dynamic, where no single family form dominates. The concept of the ‘typical family’ should therefore be replaced by an understanding of ‘family practices’ that vary across time, class and culture.
结论：总之，”核心家庭不再是常态”这一观点得到了强有力的统计和理论证据的支持。功能主义者对其自然不可缺性的辩护被意识形态批判和实证变化所削弱。虽然核心家庭依然是一个强大的文化理想和政策的参照点，但它已失去作为统计和经验常态的地位，对越来越多的人来说更是如此。英国家庭生活的现实如今最好被描述为多元且动态的，没有单一的家庭形式占据主导地位。因此，”典型家庭”的概念应被对”家庭实践”的理解所取代，后者随时间、阶级和文化而变迁。
11. Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them | 常见错误及其避免方法
Many Year 11 students lose marks through avoidable errors. One common mistake is writing a purely descriptive account of a theory without analysis. Always add ‘however’ and a counter-point. Another pitfall is failing to define key terms, such as ‘norm’, ‘primary socialisation’ or ‘social inequality’, which suggests weak sociological knowledge. Also avoid extreme language like ‘proves’ or ‘all families are…’; sociology is about probabilities, trends and interpretations, not absolute truths.
很多11年级学生因可避免的错误而失分。一个常见错误是纯粹描述某个理论而不加分析。一定要添加’然而’和相反的观点。另一个陷阱是没有定义关键术语，如’常态’、’初级社会化’或’社会不平等’，这会暗示社会学知识薄弱。也要避免使用极端语言，如’证明’或’所有家庭都…’；社会学关乎概率、趋势和解释，而非绝对真理。
Furthermore, do not neglect the conclusion. A rushed, one-line conclusion suggests you ran out of time or did not plan. Your conclusion must directly answer the question, synthesise your main points and offer a clear, justified judgement. Practice writing conclusions under timed conditions to build confidence.
此外，不要忽视结论。一个仓促的、单行的结论表明你时间不够或没有规划。你的结论必须直接回答问题，综合主要观点，并给出一个清晰、合理的判断。在计时条件下练习撰写结论，以建立信心。
12. Final Toolkit: Sentence Starters and Sophisticated Vocabulary | 工具箱：句型启头和高级词汇
Building a bank of sociological sentence starters can elevate your writing instantly. For evidence: ‘This is supported by [Sociologist] who found that…’, ‘Statistical evidence from [source] indicates…’. For analysis: ‘This suggests that…’, ‘A key implication of this is…’. For evaluation: ‘However, this view can be challenged because…’, ‘In contrast, [Theory] would argue…’, ‘The significance of this is limited by…’. For conclusions: ‘On balance, the evidence suggests…’, ‘The most convincing argument is that…’.
建立一个社会学句型启蒙库可以瞬间提升你的写作水平。用于证据的句型：’这得到了[社会学家]的支持，他发现…’，’来自[来源]的统计证据表明…’。用于分析的句型：’这表明…’，’这一点的关键含义是…’。用于评估的句型：’然而，这一观点可能受到挑战，因为…’，’相比之下，[理论]会认为…’，’这一点的重要性因…而受到限制’。用于结论的句型：’总的来说，证据表明…’，’最有说服力的论点是…’。
Using precise sociological vocabulary also signals high-level thinking. Words like ‘normative’, ‘ideological’, ’empirical’, ‘stratification’, ‘intersectionality’, ‘narrative’ and ‘hegemony’ (when used correctly) can mark out a sophisticated answer. But always prioritise clarity over complexity; never use a word you do not fully understand.
使用精确的社会学词汇也昭示着高阶思维。像’规范的’、’意识形态的’、’经验的’、’分层的’、’交叉性’、’叙事’和’霸权’等词语（在正确使用时），可以标志出一个精深复杂的答案。但永远将清晰性置于复杂性之上；永远不要使用你并未完全理解的词语。
Published by TutorHao | Sociology Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导Cancel reply