📚 Year 12 CIE Philosophy: Full Syllabus Breakdown | CIE 哲学课程大纲全面解析
The Cambridge International AS Level Philosophy (9696) syllabus invites students to engage with some of the most enduring questions human beings have ever asked. What can we know, and how do we know it? Are our actions freely chosen, or are they determined by forces beyond our control? Does God exist, and can reason settle the question? This article provides a complete breakdown of the Year 12 CIE Philosophy syllabus, covering every prescribed theme, assessment structure, and the key arguments you will need to master. Whether you are starting your course or revising for final exams, this guide will help you navigate the curriculum with clarity and confidence.
剑桥国际 AS 阶段哲学（9696）课程大纲引导学生探讨人类有史以来最经久不衰的那些根本问题。我们能知道什么？我们又是如何知道的？我们的行为是自由选择的，还是被某种超越我们控制的力量所决定？神是否存在，理性能否解决这一问题？本文将对 Year 12 CIE 哲学课程大纲进行全面解析，涵盖每一个规定主题、评估结构以及你需要掌握的核心论证。无论你是刚刚开始课程，还是正在为最终考试复习，这份指南都将帮助你清晰、自信地驾驭整个课程。
1. Overview of the CIE AS Philosophy (9696) Syllabus | CIE AS 哲学（9696）课程总览
The CIE AS Philosophy syllabus is designed to develop students’ ability to analyse, evaluate, and construct philosophical arguments. It emphasises not only knowledge of key thinkers and theories but also the skill of critical reasoning. The AS course forms the first half of the full A Level and is examined entirely through written papers. The syllabus is divided into two broad areas of study: one compulsory section on the theory of knowledge and three optional themes from metaphysics and ethics.
CIE AS 哲学课程大纲旨在培养学生分析、评估和构建哲学论证的能力。它不仅强调对关键思想家及理论的知识掌握，更注重批判性推理技能。AS 课程构成了完整 A Level 的前半部分，完全通过书面考卷进行考核。教学大纲分为两大学习领域：一部分是关于知识论的必修内容，另一部分是从形而上学与伦理学中选择的三个可选主题。
The compulsory component focuses on epistemology, the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and limits of knowledge. Students must study the rationalist and empiricist traditions, along with the central topic of perception. From the optional themes, schools typically choose three from a list that includes free will and determinism, the existence of God, ethical theories, and applied ethics. All these themes demand close engagement with primary and secondary texts, though the syllabus does not prescribe specific philosophical works.
必修部分聚焦于认识论，也就是研究知识本质及其限度的哲学分支。学生必须学习理性主义与经验主义传统，以及核心的知觉主题。在可选主题中，学校通常从一份包括自由意志与决定论、神的存在、伦理理论与应用伦理学的列表中选取三个。所有这些主题都要求学生密切接触一手与二手文本，尽管大纲并未指定特定的哲学原著。
2. Assessment Structure and Weighting | 评估结构与评分权重
AS Philosophy is assessed through two written papers, each lasting 1 hour and 30 minutes. Paper 1 covers the compulsory epistemology topics and is worth half of the AS marks. Paper 2 examines the three chosen optional themes and carries the other half. Both papers require students to demonstrate knowledge, interpretation, analysis, and evaluation in equal measure.
AS 哲学通过两份笔试进行评估，每份考试时长为 1 小时 30 分钟。试卷一涵盖必修的认识论主题，占 AS 总分的一半。试卷二考查三个选定的可选主题，占另一半分数。两份试卷都要求学生均衡地展示知识、诠释、分析与评价能力。
In Paper 1, students answer one compulsory structured question divided into parts. This question tests understanding of the core themes and typically presents a short passage or stimulus to analyse. The parts progress from straightforward knowledge recall to more demanding evaluation. Paper 2 offers a choice of questions for each optional theme; students must answer three questions in total, one from each of their three chosen themes. Each question is worth 25 marks, and candidates are expected to write essays that show critical engagement and balanced argumentation.
试卷一中，学生必须回答一道划分成若干部分的必答题。这道题测试对核心主题的理解，通常会提供一段简短的文本或材料供分析。各部分从直接的知识回忆逐步过渡到要求更高的批判性评估。试卷二针对每个可选主题提供多个题目供选择；学生总共需回答三道题，每道题来自他们选择的三个主题之一。每道题分值为 25 分，考生需撰写展示批判性参与和均衡论证的短文。
3. Compulsory Theme: Rationalism and Empiricism | 必修主题：理性主义与经验主义
The syllabus begins with the debate about the source of all knowledge. Rationalists argue that reason alone provides the foundation for knowledge, while empiricists hold that experience is the ultimate source. You will need to study the classic arguments from Descartes, Leibniz, and Spinoza on the rationalist side, and from Locke, Berkeley, and Hume on the empiricist side.
课程大纲从关于一切知识来源的争论开始。理性主义者主张纯粹理性为知识提供了基础，而经验主义者则认为经验是终极来源。你需要学习理性主义一方的经典论证，包括笛卡尔、莱布尼茨和斯宾诺莎，以及经验主义一方的洛克、贝克莱和休谟。
Central to this theme are the concepts of innate ideas, a priori knowledge, and the role of mathematics. Descartes’ cogito argument and his proofs for the existence of the self are examined in depth. On the empiricist side, Locke’s attack on innate ideas and his tabula rasa thesis, along with Hume’s distinction between relations of ideas and matters of fact, are essential. Students must be able to compare and contrast these positions and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses.
这一主题的核心概念包括天赋观念、先天知识以及数学的作用。笛卡尔的我思论证及其对自我存在的证明将被深入考察。在经验主义一方，洛克对天赋观念的攻击和他的白板说，以及休谟对观念关系与事实的区分，都是基本内容。学生必须能够比较和对照这些立场，并评估其优劣。
4. Compulsory Theme: Perception | 必修主题：知觉
The perception theme explores how our sensory experiences relate to the world. The syllabus requires a detailed understanding of direct realism, indirect realism, and idealism. Direct realism claims that we perceive physical objects directly as they are. Indirect realism, advanced by Locke, argues that we perceive sense-data that represent physical objects. Idealism, most radically defended by Berkeley, denies the existence of matter and asserts that only minds and their ideas exist.
知觉主题探讨我们的感官经验如何与世界相关联。大纲要求详细理解直接实在论、间接实在论和唯心论。直接实在论声称我们直接如其所是地知觉物理对象。由洛克提出的间接实在论则认为，我们知觉到的是代表物理对象的感觉材料。贝克莱最为激进地捍卫的唯心论否认物质的存在，断言只有心灵及其观念存在。
You will also examine the argument from illusion and the argument from hallucination, both commonly used to challenge direct realism. The time-lag argument and the causal argument for indirect realism are likewise important. Moreover, the syllabus expects students to engage with the critical responses from each side, including Berkeley’s master argument and the common-sense objection to idealism.
你还会考察来自错觉的论证和来自幻觉的论证，二者常被用来挑战直接实在论。时间延迟论证以及支持间接实在论的因果论证同样重要。此外，教学大纲期望学生探讨各方的批判性回应，包括贝克莱的主论证以及对唯心论的常识性反驳。
5. Optional Theme: Free Will and Determinism | 可选主题：自由意志与决定论
This metaphysical theme addresses the tension between our subjective sense of freedom and the possibility that all events, including human actions, are causally determined. You will study hard determinism, libertarianism, and compatibilism. Hard determinists, like Holbach, argue that free will is an illusion because every event has a sufficient cause. Libertarians, such as Reid and Sartre, defend the reality of free will, often appealing to direct introspective awareness or moral responsibility.
这一形而上学主题处理了我们主观上的自由感与一切事件（包括人类行为）可能都被因果决定这一可能性之间的张力。你将学习硬决定论、自由意志论与相容论。像霍尔巴赫这样的硬决定论者主张，自由意志是一种幻觉，因为每一事件都有充分的原因。自由意志论者，如里德和萨特，则为自由意志的真实性辩护，通常诉诸于直接的内省意识或道德责任。
Compatibilists, most notably David Hume, attempt to reconcile freedom with determinism by redefining free will as the ability to act according to one’s desires without external constraint. The syllabus demands a critical evaluation of all three positions, including discussion of moral responsibility, punishment, and the implications for personal identity. Students must also engage with modern scientific challenges, such as neurological determinism.
相容论者，最著名的是大卫·休谟，试图通过将自由意志重新定义为在无外部约束下依据个人欲望行动的能力，来调和自由与决定论。大纲要求对所有三种立场进行批判性评估，包括对道德责任、惩罚以及对个人同一性影响的讨论。学生还必须探讨现代科学的挑战，例如神经决定论。
6. Optional Theme: The Existence of God | 可选主题：神的存在
The philosophy of religion theme concentrates on arguments for and against the existence of God. Students must examine the ontological argument in its Anselmian and Cartesian forms, as well as Gaunilo’s and Kant’s famous criticisms. The cosmological argument, including Aquinas’ first three ways and the Kalam version, is studied alongside Hume’s and Russell’s objections. The teleological argument, or argument from design, is analysed through Paley’s watchmaker analogy and contemporary fine-tuning versions.
宗教哲学主题集中于支持与反对神存在的论证。学生必须考察安瑟伦式和笛卡尔式的本体论证明，以及高尼罗和康德的著名批判。宇宙论证明，包括阿奎那的前三条路径和卡拉姆版本，与休谟及罗素的反驳一起被研究。目的论证明，亦即设计论证，则通过佩利的钟表匠类比和当代的微调版本进行分析。
The problem of evil constitutes a central challenge to theistic belief. You will distinguish between moral evil and natural evil, and evaluate the theodicies offered by Augustine and Irenaeus. The possibility of life after death and the grounding of religious language are not required for AS, but the problem of evil must be discussed in depth. The ability to weigh the cumulative case for and against a deity is a key assessment objective.
恶的问题构成了对有神论信仰的核心挑战。你将区分道德恶与自然恶，并评估奥古斯丁和爱任纽提出的神正论。AS 阶段不要求讨论死后生命的可能性或宗教语言的基础，但恶的问题必须深入讨论。权衡支持与反对神存在的累积性论证的能力是一个关键评估目标。
7. Ethical Theories: Utilitarianism | 伦理理论：功利主义
Ethics at AS level requires a systematic study of two normative ethical theories, one of which is typically utilitarianism. You must grasp the principle of utility as formulated by Jeremy Bentham, who held that the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Bentham’s hedonic calculus is a crucial tool for measuring pleasure and pain along dimensions such as intensity, duration, certainty, and extent.
AS 阶段的伦理学要求系统学习两种规范伦理理论，其中一种通常是功利主义。你必须掌握杰里米·边沁所阐述的功利原则，即正确的行为是能为最大多数人带来最大幸福的行为。边沁的快乐计算法是衡量快乐与痛苦的关键工具，循其强度、持续时长、确定性、范围等维度进行。
John Stuart Mill’s refinement of utilitarianism introduces qualitative distinctions between higher and lower pleasures. Mill’s harm principle and his defence of individual liberty are often discussed as part of the theory. The syllabus expects you to evaluate the strengths of utilitarianism, such as its impartiality and practical clarity, as well as its weaknesses, including the problem of justice, the calculation objection, and the tyranny of the majority. Comparisons with Kantian ethics are frequently examined.
约翰·斯图尔特·密尔对功利主义的完善引入了高级快乐与低级快乐之间的质的区分。密尔的伤害原则及其对个体自由的辩护常作为理论的一部分加以讨论。大纲期望你评估功利主义的优点，如其公正性和实践清晰性，也须指出其缺点，包括正义问题、计算难题和多数人的暴政。与康德伦理学的比较是常见的考查内容。
8. Ethical Theories: Kantian Ethics | 伦理理论：康德伦理学
Kantian deontology stands in stark contrast to utilitarianism by grounding morality in reason and duty rather than consequences. The syllabus requires an understanding of the categorical imperative in its first formulation: ‘Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.’ You will also study the second formulation, which insists that we treat humanity always as an end, never merely as a means.
康德的义务论将道德植根于理性与义务而非后果，与功利主义形成鲜明对比。大纲要求理解定言命令的第一表述：“只依据你同时能够愿意它成为一条普遍法则的那项准则而行动。”你还将学习第二表述，即坚持我们始终将人性作为目的，而绝不仅仅作为手段。
Key concepts include the good will, duty for duty’s sake, and the distinction between acting in accordance with duty and acting from duty. The postulates of practical morality—freedom, immortality, and God—are often touched upon, though the main focus remains on the application of the categorical imperative. You will evaluate the strengths of Kantianism, such as its respect for persons and its universalisability, alongside criticisms like the problem of conflicting duties, the alleged emptiness of the test, and the neglect of emotions.
关键概念包括善良意志、为义务而义务，以及依循义务行动和出于义务行动之间的区分。实践理性的公设——自由、不朽与神——常被提及，但主要焦点仍在于定言命令的应用。你将评估康德主义的长处，如对人的尊重和其可普遍化性，同时也要考量其批评，如义务冲突问题、所谓检验的空洞性以及对情感的忽视。
9. Applied Ethics: Key Areas and Debates | 应用伦理学：关键领域与争论
Many schools select an applied ethics unit, allowing students to connect ethical theories to real-world issues. The syllabus provides a range of possible topics, including medical ethics (abortion, euthanasia, cloning), environmental ethics, business ethics, and sexual ethics. Although the choice remains flexible, the exam expects you to apply the theories of utilitarianism and Kantian ethics—or whichever theories you have studied—to concrete dilemmas.
许多学校选择一个应用伦理学单元，使学生能够将伦理理论与现实世界的问题联系起来。大纲提供了一系列可能的议题，包括医学伦理学（堕胎、安乐死、克隆）、环境伦理学、商业伦理学与性伦理学。尽管选择灵活，但考试期望你将功利主义和康德伦理学（或你所学的任何理论）应用于具体的道德困境。
When studying applied topics, do not merely describe situations; you must show how the theoretical frameworks generate conflicting prescriptions. For example, on euthanasia, a utilitarian might focus on the relief of suffering and the quality of life, while a Kantian would emphasise the dignity of human life and the prohibition against treating a person as a means. The ability to weigh these perspectives and form a justified conclusion is exactly what examiners look for in high-scoring answers.
学习应用议题时，不要仅仅描述情境；你必须展示出理论框架如何产生相互冲突的规定。例如，在安乐死问题上，功利主义者可能关注痛苦的缓解与生命质量，而康德学派则会强调人的尊严以及禁止将人视为手段。考量这些视角并形成一个正当化的结论，正是考官在高分答案中寻找的能力。
10. Understanding Command Words and Marking Criteria | 理解指令词与评分标准
CIE Philosophy examinations consistently use specific command words that signal the level of response expected. ‘Describe’ and ‘explain’ require accurate knowledge and clear exposition, while ‘evaluate’ and ‘assess’ demand critical judgement. A typical 25-mark essay question will ask you to ‘critically discuss’ or ‘evaluate’ a claim, which means you must present arguments on both sides and reach a well-reasoned conclusion.
CIE 哲学考试一贯使用特定的指令词，标示出所期望的答题层次。“描述”与“解释”要求准确的知识与清晰的阐述，而“评价”与“评估”则要求批判性判断。一道典型的 25 分论述题会要求你“批判性讨论”或“评价”一个主张，这意味着你必须呈现正反两方的论证并得出一个有充分理由的结论。
The assessment objectives (AOs) are divided into three categories: AO1 (knowledge and understanding), AO2 (analysis and evaluation), and AO3 (communication and argument). In practice, however, essays are marked holistically, with examiners looking for a sustained and coherent line of reasoning. Using the correct terminology—such as ‘valid’, ‘sound’, ‘a priori’, ‘a posteriori’, ‘synthetic’, and ‘analytic’—can significantly boost the sophistication of your answer.
评估目标分为三类：AO1（知识与理解）、AO2（分析与评价）和 AO3（交流与论证）。但在实际评分中，论文以整体方式评改，考官寻找的是连贯且一致的推理主线。正确使用术语——例如“有效”、“可靠”、“先天”、“后天”、“综合”与“分析”——能显著提升答案的精密性。
11. Study Techniques for CIE Philosophy | CIE 哲学的学习技巧
Success in CIE Philosophy depends less on memorising facts than on developing a philosophical mindset. Begin by creating a comparative table for each theme, summarising the main arguments, objections, and counter-objections. This will help you internalise the dialectical structure of philosophical writing. Practise writing timed essays regularly, and always plan before you write—allocate five minutes to sketch an introduction, for and against paragraphs, and a conclusion.
要在 CIE 哲学中取得成功，与其依赖死记硬背，不如培养一种哲学思维。首先为每个主题创建一张比较表格，概括主要论证、反驳与再反驳。这将帮助你内化哲学写作的辩证结构。定期练习限时写作，写作前务必规划——花五分钟勾画引言、支持与反对的段落以及结论。
Read beyond the textbook. While the syllabus does not require primary texts, engaging directly with Descartes’ Meditations, Hume’s Enquiry, or Mill’s Utilitarianism will deepen your understanding and provide you with richer material for evaluation. Join a discussion group or argue with classmates; philosophy is best learned through dialogue. Keep a glossary of key concepts and review it weekly.
阅读超越教科书的内容。尽管大纲不要求研读原著，直接接触笛卡尔的《沉思录》、休谟的《人类理解研究》或密尔的《功利主义》将深化你的理解，并为你提供更丰富的评价素材。加入讨论小组或与同学辩论；哲学最好通过对话来学习。建立一个关键概念词汇表，并每周复习一次。
12. Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them | 常见错误及其避免方法
One frequent error is to present a one-sided essay that merely asserts a position without considering alternatives. Examiners penalise answers that lack balance or fail to engage with counter-arguments. Another common pitfall is narrative philosophy—telling the story of what a thinker said without analysing or criticising it. Always aim to show why an argument works or fails, not just that it exists.
一个常见的错误是写出片面的论述，仅仅断言一个立场而不考虑其他选择。考官会对缺乏平衡或未能处理反论证的答案进行扣分。另一个常见误区是“描述性哲学”——只讲述思想家的说法而不进行分析或批判。永远要致力于说明一个论证为何成立或不成立，而不仅仅是指出其存在。
Students also tend to misuse technical vocabulary. Do not claim an argument is ‘valid’ in the philosophical sense unless its conclusion logically follows from its premises. Similarly, avoid blanket statements like ‘Kant is right and Bentham is wrong.’ Instead, weigh the strengths of each view relative to specific criteria. Finally, time management in the exam is crucial; peofessor many students spend too long on one question and leave insufficient time for others. Practise with past papers under timed conditions to build stamina and pace.
学生们也常误用哲学术语。除非一个论证的结论能从前提中逻辑地推出，否则不要声称它在哲学意义上是“有效”的。同样，避免诸如“康德是对的，边沁是错的”之类笼统的断言。相反，应根据具体标准衡量每种观点的优点。最后，考试中的时间管理至关重要；许多学生在某一道题上花费过长时间，导致留给其他题目的时间不足。在限时条件下练习历年真题，以培养耐力和节奏。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导Cancel reply