📚 A-Level CIE Philosophy: Vocabulary & Terminology Quick-Memorization Guide | A-Level CIE 哲学：词汇术语速记指南
Mastering philosophical terminology is the first step toward writing high-scoring essays in A-Level CIE Philosophy. This guide provides clear definitions, paired with memory hooks and contrastive techniques, to help you recall key terms confidently under exam pressure. From epistemology to ethics, each entry is designed to stick.
在 A-Level CIE 哲学中，掌握术语是写出高分论文的第一步。本文提供清晰的定义，并配以记忆钩子和对比技巧，帮助你在考试压力下自信地回忆关键术语。从认识论到伦理学，每个条目都旨在牢牢记住。
1. Core Epistemology Terms | 认识论核心术语
A priori knowledge is gained independently of sensory experience, based on reason alone. Think ‘prior’ to experience — like knowing that 2 + 2 = 4 without counting apples.
先验知识（a priori）独立于感官经验，仅凭理性获得。联想 ‘prior’（先于），就像不用数苹果就知道 2+2=4。
A posteriori knowledge depends on empirical observation and sense data. The phrase ‘post’ experience reminds you that it comes after looking at the world, e.g., ‘The cat is on the mat’ requires seeing the cat.
后验知识（a posteriori）依赖经验观察与感觉材料。’post’（后于）提示你需要观察世界，例如“猫在垫子上”需要看见猫。
An analytic truth is true purely by virtue of the meanings of the words involved, such as ‘All bachelors are unmarried men.’ No need for fieldwork — just inspect the definitions.
分析真（analytic truth）仅仅因词语的含义而为真，如“所有单身汉都是未婚男子”。无需实地调查，只需检查定义。
A synthetic truth adds information beyond the definitions of its terms, for instance, ‘The cat is on the mat.’ Memorise it as ‘synthesis’ of concepts plus factual information.
综合真（synthetic truth）在词语定义之外增添了信息，如“猫在垫子上”。记忆为概念与事实的“合成”（synthesis）。
The necessary/contingent distinction marks whether a truth holds in all possible worlds or just some. Use the mnemonic: ‘Necessary = No escape; Contingent = Could be otherwise.’
必然真/偶然真（necessary/contingent）区分了是否在所有可能世界都成立。记忆口诀：必然 = 无法逃脱；偶然 = 本可以是别样。
2. Knowledge Justification: JTB & Gettier | 知识确证：JTB 与葛梯尔
The classical tripartite definition says knowledge is justified true belief (JTB). Each component is essential: you believe p, p is true, and you have good reasons. Picture a stool with three legs — remove one, and knowledge collapses.
传统三元定义认为知识是确证的真信念（JTB）。每个要素都不可或缺：你相信 p，p 为真，且你有充分理由。想象一把三脚凳——缺一条腿，知识就坍塌了。
Edmund Gettier challenged JTB by presenting cases where someone has a justified true belief that seems lucky or accidental. The ‘Gettier case’ cocktail: mix a broken clock, a justified false step, and a lucky truth. Remember: Gettier = ‘get lucky’ with truth despite flawed reasoning.
埃德蒙·葛梯尔（Gettier）挑战了 JTB，他提出了某人拥有确证的真信念却纯属运气的情形。“葛梯尔案例”配方：搅入一只坏掉的钟、一个确证的错误步骤和一个侥幸的真相。记忆：Gettier = 尽管推理有瑕疵却“侥幸撞上”真相。
In response, virtue epistemology emphasises the intellectual character of the knower — knowledge as success from ability. Consider a skilled archer: just hitting the bullseye by accident isn’t enough; it must come from competence.
作为回应，德性知识论（virtue epistemology）强调认知者的理智品格——知识是源于能力的成功。设想一位神箭手：仅仅是意外射中靶心不足为知识，必须来自能力。
3. Rationalism vs. Empiricism | 理性主义 vs. 经验主义
Rationalists hold that reason is the primary source of knowledge, and we can access substantive truths about the world a priori. Key figures: Descartes, Leibniz, Spinoza. Memo trick: ‘Rationalists Reason your way in.’
理性主义者认为理性是知识首要来源，我们可先验地获知关于世界的实质真理。代表人物：笛卡尔、莱布尼茨、斯宾诺莎。记忆法：理性主义者用“理性（Reason）”登堂入室。
Empiricists counter that all knowledge originates in sense experience; the mind starts as a blank slate. Locke, Berkeley, Hume champion this view. Think ‘Empiricists Embrace Experience.’
经验主义者则主张所有知识起源于感觉经验；心灵最初是一块白板。洛克、贝克莱、休谟拥护此说。联想：“经验主义者拥抱经验（Experience）”。
Innate ideas are concepts present in the mind from birth, not derived from experience. Descartes’ trademark argument claims the idea of God is innate, like a craftsman’s stamp on his work. Use the image of a pre‑installed app on a smartphone.
天赋观念（innate ideas）是与生俱来而非源于经验的概念。笛卡尔的“商标论证”称上帝观念是天赋的，如同工匠留在作品上的印记。想象智能手机上预装的应用程序即可。
4. Philosophy of Perception | 知觉哲学
Direct realism asserts that we perceive physical objects immediately, as they are. The world is exactly as we sense it. The naïve view: ‘What you see is what you get.’ Problems include illusions and hallucinations.
直接实在论（direct realism）主张我们直接感知物理对象本身。世界就是我们所感知的样子。朴素观点：“所见即所得”。挑战包括错觉和幻觉。
Indirect realism proposes that we perceive sense‑data, mental representations caused by mind‑independent objects. Locke’s primary/secondary quality distinction helps: shape is in the object; colour is in the mind. Imagine watching a film: you see images, not the projector’s light directly.
间接实在论（indirect realism）提出我们感知的是感觉材料，即由独立于心灵的对象引起的心理表征。洛克的初性/次性区分有助于理解：形状在对象中，颜色在心灵里。想象看电影：你看到影像，而非直接看到放映机的光。
Idealism, notably Berkeley’s, claims that to be is to be perceived (esse est percipi). Physical objects are collections of ideas. The universe is a language from God to us. Memory hook: ‘Idealism = Ideas are all there is.’
观念论（idealism），尤以贝克莱为代表，主张存在即被感知（esse est percipi）。物理对象就是观念的集合。宇宙是上帝与我们说话的语言。记忆钩子：观念论 = 一切皆是观念。
5. Metaphysics: Reality & Universals | 形而上学：实在与共相
The problem of universals asks whether properties like redness exist independently of red things. Realists affirm that universals are real; nominalists argue only particular things exist. Rhyme to recall: ‘Nominalists say names only.’
共相问题追问像“红性”这样的属性是否独立于红色事物存在。实在论者肯定共相真实存在；唯名论者主张只有殊相存在。押韵口诀：唯名论者说“唯名而已”。
Substance dualism in the philosophy of mind distinguishes mental substance from physical substance. Descartes’ interactionism posits two-way causal influence via the pineal gland. Picture a ghost in a machine — mind inhabits body.
心灵哲学中的实体二元论（substance dualism）区分精神实体与物质实体。笛卡尔的交互论假定通过松果腺实现双向因果作用。想象机器里的幽灵——心灵居住在身体中。
Materialism (or physicalism) holds that only physical substance exists; mental states are brain states. Think of reductive materialism as ‘Mind = Matter.’ Brain scan evidence supports this, though qualia remain puzzling.
唯物主义（materialism 或物理主义）认为只存在物质实体，心理状态即大脑状态。将还原式唯物主义思考为“心灵 = 物质”。脑扫描证据支持之，但感受质（qualia）仍令人困惑。
6. Philosophy of Mind | 心灵哲学（续）
Functionalism defines mental states by their causal roles — what they do, not what they are made of. Pain is whatever state is caused by tissue damage and leads to wincing. This allows minds in silicon. Remember: ‘Function over form.’
功能主义（functionalism）依据因果角色定义心理状态——它们做什么，而非由什么构成。疼痛就是由组织损伤引起并导致皱眉退缩的任何状态。这容许硅基心灵存在。记住：功能重于形式。
The hard problem of consciousness, introduced by David Chalmers, asks why physical processes give rise to subjective experience. It’s the question of why it feels like something to be us. The ‘explanatory gap’ persists. Visual aid: why does red look like that?
意识的“困难问题”（Chalmers 提出）追问物理过程为何产生主观体验。即何以有“作为我们是什么感觉”的问题。“解释鸿沟”持续存在。视觉辅助：红色看起来为什么是那种样子？
7. Ethics: Utilitarianism & Deontology | 伦理学：功利主义与义务论
Utilitarianism, particularly Bentham’s act utilitarianism, maximises utility — the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It is consequentialist and hedonistic. Use the felicific calculus to weigh pleasures. Memory: ‘Utility = Useful to the many.’
功利主义（utilitarianism），尤其边沁的行为功利主义，最大化功利——最大多数人的最大幸福。它是后果主义的和快乐主义的。用幸福计算来衡量快乐。记忆：功利 = 对多数人有用。
Kant’s deontology insists on acting from duty out of respect for the moral law. The categorical imperative demands we act only on maxims that could become universal law without contradiction. Never treat humanity merely as a means. Think: ‘Deon’ is Greek for duty, so deontology = dutyology.
康德的义务论（deontology）强调出于义务并尊重道德律的行动。定言命令（categorical imperative）要求只依据你能同时意愿其成为普遍法则的准则行动。永远把人当作目的，而非仅仅手段。联想：’Deon’ 在希腊语中意为义务，因而 deontology 即义务学。
8. Virtue Ethics & Meta‑ethics | 美德伦理与元伦理学
Virtue ethics, rooted in Aristotle, focuses on developing excellent character traits (virtues) to flourish (eudaimonia). The doctrine of the mean locates virtue between extremes. Courage is the mean between cowardice and rashness. Memo: ‘Virtue is the golden mean.’
美德伦理学（virtue ethics）植根于亚里士多德，聚焦于培养优秀品格特质（美德）以实现繁荣（eudaimonia）。中道学说将美德定位于极端之间。勇敢是怯懦与鲁莽的中道。口诀：美德即黄金中道。
Cognitivism in ethics asserts that moral statements express beliefs that can be true or false. Moral realism is a cognitive view: ‘Murder is wrong’ reports a fact. Non‑cognitivism, however, claims moral utterances are expressions of emotion or commands. Emotivism: ‘Boo to torture!’ Memory: ‘Cognitivists claim moral COGNITION.’
认知主义（cognitivism）在伦理学中断定，道德语句表达可真可假的信念。道德实在论是一种认知观点：“谋杀是错的”报道了一个事实。而非认知主义（non‑cognitivism）主张道德话语是情感或命令的表达。情绪主义：“折磨，呸！”记忆法：认知主义者声称道德有“认知”（cognition）。
9. Philosophy of Religion | 宗教哲学
The ontological argument, from Anselm to Plantinga, defines God as the greatest conceivable being; existence in reality is greater than existence in the mind alone. Hence God exists. Gaunilo’s island parody challenges this. Mnemonic: ‘Ontology – ONTO existence.’
本体论论证（ontological argument），从安瑟伦到普兰丁格，将上帝定义为可设想的最伟大存在；在现实中存在比只在心灵中存在更伟大。故上帝存在。高尼罗的“迷失岛”反驳挑战此说。记忆：本体论 — 存在（ON TO）即是。
The cosmological argument traces back to a first cause or necessary being. Aquinas’ Five Ways include the argument from motion. ‘Cosmos’ means universe, so the cosmological argument starts from the universe’s existence. Think ‘Cosmic first cause.’
宇宙论论证（cosmological argument）追溯至第一因或必然存在。阿奎那五路中的运动证明即属此类。’Cosmos’ 意为宇宙，故宇宙论论证从宇宙存在出发。联想“宇宙第一因”。
The teleological argument (design argument) infers a designer from the apparent order and purpose in nature. Paley’s watchmaker analogy: a watch implies a watchmaker. The fine‑tuning of physical constants is a modern version. Remember: ‘Teleology = purpose (telos) study.’
目的论论证（teleological argument 或设计论证）从自然界的显明秩序与目的推断有一位设计者。佩利的钟表匠类比：钟表意味着钟表匠。物理常数的精细调节是其现代版本。记忆：目的论 = 目的（telos）之学。
10. Free Will & Determinism | 自由意志与决定论
Hard determinism claims every event is causally necessitated, so free will is an illusion. Connect with Laplace’s demon: if you know all positions and forces, you can predict the entire future. No room for alternative possibilities.
硬决定论（hard determinism）声称每件事都是因果必然的，因此自由意志是幻觉。联系拉普拉斯妖：若知道所有位置与力，就能预测整个未来。没有替选可能的余地。
Compatibilism (soft determinism) reconciles free will with determinism. Free actions are those caused by internal states without external coercion. Hume’s classic definition: liberty is the power to act according to the determinations of the will. Memo: ‘Compatibilism = Compatible with determinism.’
相容论（compatibilism 或 soft determinism）调和自由意志与决定论。自由行动是由内在状态引起且无外部强制的行动。休谟的经典定义：自由是按意志决定而行动的能力。记忆：相容论 = 与决定论相容。
Libertarianism (not political) insists we have genuine free will that is incompatible with determinism. Agent‑causal theories propose we can initiate new causal chains. The idea is that we are prime movers unmoved. Paradox: can you choose your choices?
自由意志论（libertarianism，非政治意义上）坚称我们拥有与决定论不相容的真实自由意志。行动者因果理论提出我们能开启新的因果链。其理念是我们是“不被推动的推动者”。悖论：你能选择自己的选择吗？
11. Logic & Analytic Philosophy Terms | 逻辑与分析哲学术语
Deductive arguments aim for certainty: if premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Validity means the argument’s structure is truth‑preserving. Soundness adds that premises are actually true. Use the ‘Validity = Structure; Sound = Structure + True premises’ grid.
| Term | Definition |
| Deduction | Top‑down logic: general to specific |
| Induction | Bottom‑up: specific to probable generalisation |
| Abduction | Inference to the best explanation |
演绎论证追求必然性：前提真则结论必真。有效（validity）指论证结构保真；可靠（soundness）还要求前提实际为真。使用表格记忆：有效 = 结构；可靠 = 结构 + 真前提。归纳（induction）是自下而上，溯因（abduction）是最佳解释推理。
The analytic‑synthetic distinction (revisited) pairs with necessary‑contingent. Analytic truths are true by definition; synthetic truths depend on worldly facts. Necessary truths hold in all possible worlds. Cross‑link these to build a mental map: Analytic => Necessary; Synthetic => often Contingent, though there are synthetic a priori truths (Kant).
分析-综合区分与必然-偶然对应。分析真依定义为真；综合真依赖世界事实。必然真在所有可能世界成立。交叉联系形成心象地图：分析的 ⇒ 必然的；综合的 ⇒ 通常是偶然的，尽管存在先天综合判断（康德）。
12. Memorization Techniques Recap | 速记技巧汇总
Use etymology: many terms come from Latin or Greek. For example, ‘epistemology’ from epistēmē (knowledge) + logos (study). ‘Ontology’ from on (being) + logos. Breaking words into roots acts like a cheat code.
利用词源：许多术语来自拉丁语或希腊语。例如 ‘epistemology’ 源自 epistēmē（知识）+ logos（学问）。’Ontology’ 来自 on（存在）+ logos。拆分词根就像使用作弊码。
Create contrast pairs: internalise opposing concepts together — rationalism/empiricism, realism/idealism, cognitivism/non‑cognitivism. Set them as sparring partners in your mental dialogue; the tension improves recall.
创建对比对：把对立概念捆绑内化——理性主义/经验主义、实在论/观念论、认知主义/非认知主义。让它们在你的心理对话中彼此较量；张力能提升回忆。
Invent vivid stories or images: for Gettier cases, imagine a broken clock that accidentally shows the right time. For categorical imperative, visualise King Categorical issuing universal laws. The more bizarre the image, the stickier it becomes.
编创生动故事或图像：对于葛梯尔案例，想象一只坏掉的钟恰巧显示正确时间。对于定言命令，把“定言王”画出颁布普遍法则的形象。图像越离奇越牢固。
Finally, test yourself with active recall: cover the definitions and try to explain each term aloud in your own words, both in English and your target language. Spaced repetition with these bite‑sized bilingual explanations will secure long‑term memory for your CIE exam.
最后，用主动回忆测试自己：遮住定义，尝试用自己的话大声解释每个术语，中英文皆可。采用这些短小双语解释的间隔重复法，将为你的 CIE 考试锁定长期记忆。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导Cancel reply