Motivation in Business | 商务中的激励

📚 Motivation in Business | 商务中的激励

Motivation is the internal and external drive that stimulates a person to act in a particular way. In a business context, it refers to the willingness of employees to exert effort towards achieving organisational goals. A highly motivated workforce tends to be more productive, engaged and loyal, reducing absenteeism and labour turnover. Theories of motivation help managers understand what drives human behaviour and how to design jobs, rewards and working conditions that inspire staff to perform at their best.

激励是促使个体以特定方式行动的内在与外在驱动力。在商业领域，它指的是员工为实现组织目标而付出努力的意愿。受到良好激励的员工队伍往往生产力更高、更投入且更忠诚，从而降低缺勤率和人员流失。激励理论有助于管理者理解人类行为的驱动因素，并指导他们如何设计工作、报酬与工作条件，以激发员工的最佳表现。

1. What is Motivation? | 什么是激励？

Motivation can be defined as the set of psychological forces that initiate, direct and sustain goal-directed behaviour. It consists of intensity (how hard a person tries), direction (the channel towards which effort is oriented) and persistence (how long the effort is maintained). In a business setting, motivated employees are those who take initiative, meet deadlines, innovate and strive for continuous improvement.

激励可以定义为一组引发、引导并维持目标导向行为的心理力量。它包含强度（个体努力的程度）、方向（努力所指向的渠道）和持续性（努力维持的时间）。在商业环境中，受到激励的员工会主动承担责任、按时完成任务、创新并追求持续改进。

Without motivation, even the most skilled employee can become disengaged. A manager’s ability to inspire motivation is therefore a core leadership competency. Different theories offer competing explanations of what causes motivation, ranging from simple financial rewards to complex psychological needs.

缺乏激励，即使技能最优秀的员工也会变得消极。因此，管理者激发激励的能力是一项核心领导能力。不同的理论对激励的成因提供了不同的解释，从简单的金钱报酬到复杂的心理需求不等。

2. Taylor’s Scientific Management | 泰勒的科学管理理论

Frederick W. Taylor (1911) proposed that workers are primarily motivated by money and that productivity could be maximised by breaking down tasks into small, repetitive components. His scientific management approach used time and motion studies to identify ‘one best way’ to perform each job. Workers would be paid a piece-rate wage, earning more for higher output.

弗雷德里克·W·泰勒（1911年）提出，工人主要受金钱激励，通过将工作任务拆分为细小、重复的环节可以实现生产率最大化。他的科学管理方法运用时间与动作研究来找出完成每项工作的“唯一最佳方式”。工人会按计件工资获得报酬，产出越高收入越多。

Taylor’s model assumed employees are rational-economic beings. The manager’s role was to plan, control and closely supervise, leaving little discretion to the worker. This approach led to significant productivity gains in manufacturing but often resulted in monotonous jobs, physical strain and strong resistance from trade unions.

泰勒的模型假设员工是理性的经济人。管理者的角色是计划、控制和严密监督，留给工人的自主空间很小。这一方法在生产制造领域带来了显著的生产率提高，但也常常导致工作单调、身体劳损以及工会的强烈抵制。

Although Taylorism is less popular today, its influence can still be seen in call centres and fast-food chains where tasks are standardised and performance is measured quantitatively. However, critics argue it ignores social needs and intrinsic motivation.

尽管泰勒制如今已不太流行，但其影响仍可见于呼叫中心和快餐连锁店，这些地方的任务高度标准化并以量化方式衡量绩效。然而，批评者认为它忽视了社会需求和内在激励。

3. Mayo’s Human Relations Approach | 梅奥的人际关系方法

Elton Mayo’s Hawthorne Studies (1924–1932) challenged Taylor’s assumptions by demonstrating that social factors and group dynamics significantly influence worker motivation and productivity. In the famous experiments, changes in lighting, rest breaks and working hours all led to output increases, not because of physical conditions, but because the workers felt valued and developed a sense of belonging.

埃尔顿·梅奥的霍桑研究（1924–1932年）挑战了泰勒的假设，证明社会因素和群体动力对工人的激励与生产率有显著影响。在著名的实验中，照明、休息时间和工作时长的改变都带来了产出的增加，原因并非物理条件的改善，而是工人感到被重视并形成了归属感。

Mayo concluded that informal work groups, recognition and communication play vital roles. When workers are consulted and their opinions matter, morale rises. This led to the human relations school of management, which advocates for more democratic leadership, teamwork and employee welfare.

梅奥得出结论，非正式工作群体、认可和沟通起着至关重要的作用。当工人被征求意见且他们的观点被重视时，士气便会提升。由此产生了人际关系管理学派，它倡导更民主的领导风格、团队合作和员工福利。

A practical implication is that managers should invest time in building relationships, listening to employees and fostering a supportive culture. This can be more effective than purely financial incentives.

实际意义在于，管理者应投入时间建立关系、倾听员工心声并营造支持性文化。这可能比单纯的金钱激励更为有效。

4. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs | 马斯洛的需求层次理论

Abraham Maslow (1943) arranged human needs into a five-tier pyramid. From bottom to top: physiological needs (food, water, shelter), safety needs (job security, health insurance), social needs (friendship, belonging), esteem needs (recognition, status) and self-actualisation (reaching one’s full potential). Maslow argued that lower-level needs must be substantially satisfied before the next level becomes a motivating force.

亚伯拉罕·马斯洛（1943年）将人类需求排列为一个五层金字塔。从下到上依次为：生理需求（食物、水、住所）、安全需求（工作保障、医疗保险）、社交需求（友谊、归属感）、尊重需求（认可、地位）和自我实现（发挥全部潜能）。马斯洛认为，较低层次的需求必须得到充分满足后，下一层次才会成为激励力量。

In a business, this means a wage that covers basic living costs meets physiological needs; a permanent contract and a safe workplace address safety; team events and mentoring satisfy social needs; job titles and performance awards provide esteem; and challenging projects or personal development plans can help employees move towards self-actualisation.

在商业中，这意味着能覆盖基本生活费的工资满足了生理需求；长期合同和安全的工作场所满足了安全需求；团队活动和导师制度能满足社交需求；职位头衔和绩效奖励提供尊重感；具有挑战性的项目或个人发展计划则可帮助员工走向自我实现。

Critics point out that the hierarchy is rigid and culture-bound; not everyone prioritises needs in the same order. Nevertheless, it reminds managers that relying solely on pay may leave higher needs unmet, limiting long-term motivation.

批评者指出，该层次理论较为僵化且受文化局限，并非所有人都按相同的顺序排列需求。尽管如此，它提醒管理者，仅仅依赖薪酬可能会使更高层次的需求得不到满足，从而限制长期激励。

5. Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory | 赫茨伯格的双因素理论

Frederick Herzberg (1959) distinguished between hygiene factors and motivators. Hygiene factors are extrinsic conditions such as company policy, supervision, salary and working conditions. Their absence causes dissatisfaction, but their presence does not necessarily motivate. Motivators, on the other hand, are intrinsic factors like achievement, recognition, responsibility, advancement and personal growth. These are what truly drive employees to perform better.

弗雷德里克·赫茨伯格（1959年）区分了保健因素和激励因素。保健因素是外在条件，如公司政策、监督、薪酬和工作环境。缺少它们会引起不满，但拥有它们并不一定能产生激励。而激励因素是内在因素，如成就感、认可、责任、晋升和个人成长，这些才是真正促使员工表现更好的动力。

Herzberg’s research suggested that job enrichment is key: by redesigning jobs to give employees more autonomy, variety and significance, managers can boost intrinsic motivation. Simply increasing pay or improving lighting may reduce discontent but will not create a passionate workforce.

赫茨伯格的研究表明，工作丰富化是关键：通过重新设计工作以赋予员工更多自主性、多样性和意义，管理者可以提升内在激励。仅仅加薪或改善照明可能减少不满，但无法打造充满热情的员工队伍。

A practical application is vertical loading, where an employee is given some managerial responsibilities such as planning budgets or mentoring juniors. This increases the depth of the job and feeds the motivator needs. The theory aligns closely with modern ’employee engagement’ approaches.

实际应用之一是纵向加载，即赋予员工一些管理职责，例如规划预算或指导初级员工。这增加了工作的深度并满足了激励因素需求。该理论与现代“员工敬业度”方法高度契合。

6. McClelland’s Acquired Needs Theory | 麦克莱兰的成就需要理论

David McClelland (1961) identified three dominant motivational drivers that are acquired through life experiences: need for achievement (nAch), need for affiliation (nAff) and need for power (nPow). High achievers seek challenging goals and personal responsibility; those with high affiliation value relationships and collaboration; power-motivated individuals desire influence and control.

戴维·麦克莱兰（1961年）识别出三种通过生活经历习得的主要激励驱动因素：成就需要（nAch）、亲和需要（nAff）和权力需要（nPow）。高成就需要者追求具有挑战性的目标和承担个人责任；高亲和需要者重视人际关系与合作；权力驱动型个体渴望影响力和控制力。

In an organisational context, matching people to roles that fit their dominant need profile can enhance motivation. For instance, a salesperson with high nAch thrives on difficult targets and immediate feedback, while a teamwork-based role suits a high nAff individual.

在组织情境中，将员工匹配到符合其主要需求特征的岗位可以增强激励。例如，具有高成就需要的销售员会在挑战性目标和即时反馈下蓬勃发展，而基于团队合作的岗位则适合高亲和需要的个体。

McClelland also argued that entrepreneurs and managers often have a high need for achievement and moderate need for power. The need for power, when oriented towards institutional rather than personal gains, is associated with effective leadership. Training programmes can be used to develop achievement motivation.

麦克莱兰还认为，企业家和管理者通常具有较高的成就需要和适度的权力需要。当权力需要以集体利益为导向而非个人私利时，它与有效的领导力相关。可以通过培训项目培养成就动机。

7. Vroom’s Expectancy Theory | 弗鲁姆的期望理论

Victor Vroom (1964) proposed a cognitive process theory stating that motivation depends on three perceptions: expectancy (effort will lead to performance), instrumentality (performance will lead to an outcome) and valence (the value an individual places on that outcome). The multiplicative formula is Motivation = Expectancy × Instrumentality × Valence. If any factor is zero, overall motivation collapses.

维克多·弗鲁姆（1964年）提出了一种认知过程理论，认为激励取决于三种感知：期望（努力会带来绩效）、工具性（绩效会带来结果）和效价（个体对结果赋予的价值）。其乘法公式为：激励＝期望 × 工具性 × 效价。若任一因素为零，整体激励便会崩解。

This theory explains why a generous bonus might fail to motivate if the employee does not believe extra effort leads to higher sales (low expectancy) or if the bonus is of little personal interest (low valence). It emphasises that managers must clarify the effort-performance link, deliver promised rewards and ensure rewards are desirable for each individual.

该理论解释了为何即便丰厚的奖金也可能无法产生激励，如果员工不信额外努力会提高销售额（低期望），或奖金对其个人价值不大（低效价）。它强调管理者必须明确努力与绩效的联系、兑现承诺的奖励，并确保奖励对每一位员工都具有吸引力。

Practical steps include setting realistic targets, providing necessary resources and training, transparent performance appraisals and personalised reward packages. Expectancy theory remains highly influential because it recognises that motivation is an individual, rational calculation.

实际步骤包括设定切实可行的目标、提供必要的资源和培训、透明的绩效评估以及个性化的薪酬方案。期望理论至今仍有很强的影响力，因为它认识到激励是个体的一种理性计算。

8. Financial Motivation Methods | 财务激励方法

Financial rewards remain one of the most widely used forms of motivation. Common methods include time-based wages (hourly or monthly salary), piece-rate pay, commission, bonuses, profit sharing and share options. Each has advantages and limitations.

财务报酬仍然是最广泛使用的激励形式之一。常见的方法包括计时工资（时薪或月薪）、计件工资、佣金、奖金、利润分享和股票期权。每种方法都有其优点和局限性。

Piece-rate pay rewards quantity over quality and suits repetitive production. Commission is common in sales roles, directly linking pay to results. Bonuses, often discretionary, can motivate short-term effort. Profit sharing gives employees a stake in the company’s overall success, fostering a sense of ownership, though the link between individual effort and profit can be weak. Share options, frequently offered to executives, align long-term interests.

计件工资奖励数量而非质量，适用于重复性生产。佣金在销售岗位中很常见，将报酬与业绩直接挂钩。奖金通常是酌情发放的，可以激励短期努力。利润分享让员工分享公司整体成功的利益，培养主人翁意识，但个人努力与利润之间的联系可能较弱。股票期权常提供给高管，使长期利益趋于一致。

Method	Advantage	Disadvantage
Salary / Wage	Income security	Little direct link to effort
Piece-rate	High output rewarded	Quality may suffer
Commission	Directly tied to sales	Income instability
Profit sharing	Encourages teamwork	Individual impact diluted

Critically, financial incentives can crowd out intrinsic motivation if overemphasised. Herzberg categorised salary as a hygiene factor, not a motivator. Therefore, money works best in combination with non-financial motivators.

重要的是，如果过分强调财务激励，它可能会挤出内在动机。赫茨伯格将薪酬归为保健因素而非激励因素。因此，金钱与非财务激励结合使用效果最佳。

9. Non-Financial Motivation Methods | 非财务激励方法

Non-financial motivators target employees’ psychological, social and growth needs. They include job enrichment, empowerment, training and development, flexible working, recognition and awards, a positive organisational culture, and effective communication.

非财务激励因素针对员工的心理、社交和成长需求，包括工作丰富化、授权、培训与发展、弹性工作制、认可与表彰、积极的组织文化和有效的沟通。

Job enrichment adds complexity, autonomy and responsibility to a role. For example, giving a machine operator authority to schedule maintenance and mentor new hires. Empowerment involves delegating decision-making authority, which builds trust and confidence. Flexitime and remote working enhance work-life balance, increasingly valued by modern employees.

工作丰富化为岗位增加了复杂性、自主性和责任。例如，赋予机器操作员安排维护和指导新员工的权力。授权涉及下放决策权，这能建立信任和自信。弹性工作制和远程办公有助于提升工作与生活的平衡，这一点越来越受现代员工重视。

Recognition can be as simple as ‘Employee of the Month’ certificates or a public thank-you. Training and career progression opportunities signal that the organisation invests in its people, boosting loyalty. These methods are often low-cost yet can significantly improve job satisfaction and reduce staff turnover.

认可可以简单如“月度最佳员工”证书或公开表扬。培训与职业发展机会表明组织在投资员工，从而提升忠诚度。这类方法通常成本低，却能显著提高工作满意度并降低员工离职率。

10. Linking Motivation to Productivity | 激励与生产率的关系

Higher motivation generally leads to higher labour productivity, measured as output per worker per hour. However, the relationship is not always linear. Influencing factors include organisational structure, technology, management approach and external economic conditions.

更高的激励通常会带来更高的劳动生产率，即每名工人每小时产出量。然而，这种关系并不总是线性的。影响因素包括组织结构、技术、管理方式和外部经济环境。

Under Taylorism, the productivity gain stemmed from standardised processes and direct financial rewards. The human relations approach showed that satisfied workers cooperate better, reducing wastage and idle time. In knowledge-based industries, intrinsic motivation drives creativity and discretionary effort, which can lead to product innovations and process improvements.

在泰勒制下，生产率的提高源于标准化流程和直接的财务回报。人际关系方法表明，满意的员工更善于合作，从而减少浪费和闲置时间。在知识型产业中，内在激励驱动创造力和自主努力，这可以带来产品创新和流程改进。

Managers should therefore measure both quantitative outcomes (units produced, sales revenue) and qualitative indicators (absence rate, employee surveys) to gauge motivation. A balanced approach that combines meaningful work, fair pay, recognition and development opportunities is most likely to sustain high performance.

因此，管理者应同时衡量量化结果（生产件数、销售收入）和定性指标（缺勤率、员工调查）来判断激励水平。将有意义的工作、公平报酬、认可和发展机会相结合的综合方法最有可能维持高绩效。

Published by TutorHao | Business Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）

Motivation in Business | 商务中的激励