A-Level CIE English: Writing Skills Exam-Focused Guide | A-Level CIE 英语：写作技巧考点精讲

📚 A-Level CIE English: Writing Skills Exam-Focused Guide | A-Level CIE 英语：写作技巧考点精讲

Welcome to this comprehensive guide designed to help you excel in the writing components of the Cambridge International A-Level English Language examination (9093). Writing at this level requires more than just grammatical accuracy; it demands a sophisticated understanding of audience, purpose, register, and form. Whether you are crafting a persuasive commentary, analysing a text, or producing original compositions, the principles outlined here will sharpen your skills and boost your confidence. This article systematically breaks down the key assessment criteria, explores advanced techniques for structure and style, and provides practical strategies you can apply immediately in your revision and timed essays. Mastering these elements is essential for achieving top marks at AS and A2 levels, where examiners look for precision, flair, and critical insight.

欢迎阅读这份为您精心准备的综合指南，旨在帮助您在剑桥国际A-Level英语语言考试（9093）的写作部分中脱颖而出。这一级别的写作不仅仅要求语法准确，还需要对受众、目的、语域和文体形式有深刻的理解。无论您是在撰写有说服力的评论、分析文本，还是进行原创创作，本文概述的原则都将提升您的写作技巧并增强信心。本文系统性地分解了关键的评估标准，探讨了结构、风格的高级技巧，并提供了可以立即应用于复习和限时论文写作的实用策略。掌握这些要素对于在AS和A2阶段取得高分至关重要，因为考官看重的是精确性、才华和批判性洞察力。

1. Understanding Assessment Objectives | 理解评估目标

Before putting pen to paper, it is crucial to understand exactly what examiners evaluate. For CIE A-Level English Language, the primary assessment objectives centre on AO1 (Read and demonstrate understanding of texts), AO2 (Write effectively for different audiences and purposes), and AO3 (Analyse language use). In the writing papers, AO2 is weighted most heavily, testing your ability to shape language to suit specific genres, from discursive essays to dramatic monologues. Precise control of tone and a clear sense of the intended reader are non-negotiable. At the higher bands, candidates must also integrate cohesive lexical fields and demonstrate a flair for original phrasing. Aligning every paragraph with these objectives transforms a good essay into an exceptional one.

在动笔之前，理解考官究竟在评估什么是至关重要的。对于CIE A-Level英语语言考试，主要评估目标集中在AO1（阅读并理解文本）、AO2（为不同受众和目的有效写作）和AO3（分析语言使用）。在写作试卷中，AO2的权重最高，测试您将语言塑造成适合特定体裁的能力，从议论文到戏剧独白。对语气的精确控制和对目标读者的清晰认知是不可或缺的。在更高分数段，考生还必须整合连贯的词汇场，并展示出原创措辞的才华。让每一段都符合这些目标，就能将一篇好文章转变为出色的文章。

At AS Level, the focus is on directed writing, where you must adopt a persona and respond to given source material. At A2 Level, you produce more extended, independent compositions, often requiring a critical lens or speculative element. Across both levels, the technical accuracy of your spelling, punctuation, and grammar underpins everything: persistent errors undermine even the most brilliant arguments. A-Level writing demands a proactive approach to proofreading, with five to ten minutes always reserved for checking your work in timed conditions.

在AS阶段，重点是定向写作，您必须扮演一个角色并回应给定的源材料。在A2阶段，则要求进行更长的、独立的写作创作，通常需要批判性视角或推测性元素。在这两个阶段，拼写、标点和语法的技术准确性是所有写作的基础：持续的错误甚至会破坏最出色的论点。A-Level写作要求主动进行校对，在限时条件下，始终预留五到十分钟检查您的卷面。

2. Crafting a Thesis-Driven Argument | 构建由论点驱动的论证

A standout A-Level essay is propelled by a clear, contestable thesis statement, not merely a topic observation. A weak thesis simply restates the question, whereas a strong thesis presents a specific stance that requires justification. For example, instead of writing ‘This essay will discuss the use of persuasive techniques in the editorial,’ a sharp thesis declares, ‘The editorial employs a veneer of rational balance to mask its deeply emotive manipulation, ultimately coercing rather than convincing its readership.’ This immediately signals critical thinking to the examiner. Your thesis should be the controlling idea that binds every paragraph together, preventing the essay from becoming a list of disconnected points.

一篇杰出的A-Level论文由一个清晰、可辩论的论点陈述推动，而不仅仅是对话题的观察。一个薄弱的论点只是重申问题，而强有力的论点则提出一个需要证明的具体立场。例如，与其写“本文将讨论社论中说服技巧的运用”，一个犀利的论点应声明：“该社论利用理性平衡的表象来掩盖其深层的情感操控，最终是在胁迫而非说服其读者。”这立刻向考官展示了批判性思维。您的论点应该是控制全文思路的观点，将每个段落紧密结合，防止文章变成一堆互不相关的要点罗列。

Each subsequent body paragraph must then function as a mini-argument that directly supports this overarching thesis. Begin with a distinct topic sentence that introduces the paragraph’s specific claim, then embed evidence such as quotations or contextual references, and follow with deep analysis exploring the effect on the reader. The analysis is where high marks are won: do not just identify a rhetorical question; explain how its syntactic placement interrupts the reader’s flow, creating a moment of forced reflection. Every sentence should either build the argument or illuminate the source text, never merely summarising plot or content.

随后的每个正文段落都必须充当直接支持这一总论点的小型论证。以一个独特的主题句开头，引出段落的具体主张，接着嵌入证据，如引文或语境参考，然后进行深入分析，探讨对读者的影响。分析正是赢得高分的地方：不要仅仅指出一个反问句，要解释其句法位置如何打断读者的阅读流，创造一个被迫反思的时刻。每一句话都应该构建论证或阐明源文本，切勿仅仅总结情节或内容。

3. Mastering Style, Register, and Form | 掌握风格、语域与文体

Adaptability is the hallmark of an A* candidate. You must be able to shift seamlessly between a formal academic register in a critical analysis, a colloquial yet crafted voice in a magazine article, and the intimate immediacy of a diary entry. Register governs word choice, sentence length, and grammatical structures: a formal analysis employs nominalisation and the passive voice judiciously, while a blog post embraces contractions, sentence fragments, and direct address to foster a sense of community. Misjudging the register results in a dissonant voice that breaks the reader’s trust in the persona. Always identify the target audience’s expectations before drafting: are they seeking objective information, entertainment, or empathetic reflection?

适应性是A*考生的标志。您必须能够在批判性分析的正式学术语域、杂志文章中口语化但精心雕琢的文风，以及日记记录的亲密即时感之间无缝切换。语域决定了用词、句子长度和语法结构：正式分析会审慎使用名词化和被动语态，而博客文章则欢迎缩约词、句子片段和直接称呼，以营造社群感。错误地判断语域会产生不和谐的声音，破坏读者对角色的信任。在起草之前，始终要确定目标读者的期望：他们在寻求客观信息、娱乐，还是共情反思？

Form refers to the structural conventions of a text type: a letter requires a salutation and a sign-off; a script is governed by layout dialogue. Sophisticated candidates can deliberately subvert generic conventions for effect, but this demands a visible control that proves the deviation is purposeful rather than a careless error. For creative writing tasks, grasp the rhythms of your chosen form; a dramatic monologue thrives on a distinctive, psychologically revealing voice, while a travelogue relies on vivid sensory description and reflective commentary.

文体指某一文本类型的结构惯例：信件需要称呼和落款；剧本受对话布局的制约。成熟的考生可以为追求效果刻意颠覆体裁惯例，但这需要明显的控制力，以证明偏离是有意为之，而非粗心犯错。对于创意写作任务，要掌握所选文体的节奏；戏剧独白依靠独特、揭示心理状态的声音而鲜活，而旅行游记则依赖生动的感官描写和反思性评论。

4. Structural Cohesion and Paragraphing | 结构衔接与段落划分

A logically coherent structure is the skeleton that holds the writing upright. Examiners penalise essays that wander, where ideas appear in a random order without linking logic. A simple yet effective approach is the ‘PEEL’ method: Point, Evidence, Evaluation, Link. This ensures focused analysis, but at A-Level you must go beyond this basic formula. The transition between paragraphs should feel like a natural progression of thought, often achieved through discourse markers and the strategic repetition of key lexical items. Instead of a mechanical ‘Furthermore,’ try a more nuanced transition like ‘This pattern of imagery is intensified when…’ or ‘Paradoxically, the writer then undercuts this tone by…’

逻辑连贯的结构是支撑写作屹立不倒的骨架。考官会扣罚那些漫无目的、观点顺序混乱且缺乏连接逻辑的文章。一个简单而有效的方法是“PEEL”法：观点、证据、评估、连接。这能确保分析聚焦，但在A-Level，您必须超越这个基本公式。段落之间的过渡应该像是思想的自然推进，通常通过话语标记词和关键词汇项的策略性重复来实现。与其用机械的“此外”，不如尝试更细腻的过渡，如“这种意象模式在……时得到了强化”或“矛盾的是，作者随后通过……削弱了这种语气”。

Discourse markers such as ‘conversely,’ ‘similarly,’ and ‘ultimately’ are essential signposts for the reader navigating your argument. However, the highest-scoring scripts use conceptual continuity: the final sentence of one paragraph plants a seed that the next paragraph harvests. This creates a seamless flow that feels rigorous yet unforced. Plan your paragraph sequence before you start writing; jotting down the main claim for each paragraph on a planning document in the first five minutes will save you from structural drift.

诸如“相反地”、“相似地”和“最终”这样的话语标记词是为读者导航论点的重要路标。然而，最高分的试卷会使用概念连续性：一段的最后一句话播下种子，下一段则将其收获。这创造了一种严丝合缝的流畅感，既严谨又不牵强。在开始写作之前规划好段落顺序；在最初五分钟内，在草稿纸上记下每段的主要主张，能避免结构偏离。

5. Lexical Sophistication and Semantic Fields | 词汇精密度与语义场

Vocabulary at A-Level is not about showing off obscure words; it is about precision and consistency. A sophisticated lexicon is one where each word fits the context perfectly and contributes to a unified semantic field. For example, an essay on urban alienation might consistently draw on lexis related to isolation, mechanisation, and fragmentation. Using a thesaurus to randomly insert ‘plethora’ for ‘many’ often leads to stylistic infelicities; instead, the precise word is the one that conveys the exact nuance required. Distinguish between near-synonyms such as ‘cynical,’ ‘sceptical,’ and ‘pessimistic,’ each of which bears a slightly different connotation.

A-Level阶段的词汇不是炫耀晦涩难懂的词，而是讲究精确性和一致性。精密的词汇库指的是每一个词都完美契合语境，并为统一的语义场做出贡献。例如，一篇关于城市异化的论文可能会持续采用与孤立、机械化和碎片化相关的词汇。使用同义词库随意将“many”替换为“plethora”，往往会造成风格上的不妥；相反，精确的词是能够传达所需确切细微差别的词。要区分诸如“cynical”（愤世嫉俗）、“sceptical”（怀疑的）和“pessimistic”（悲观的）这样的近义词，每一个都有略微不同的内涵。

Word classes also powerfully shape meaning. A pre-modification string, the stacking of adjectives before a noun, can create density and overwhelm the reader, as in ‘a bleak, crumbling, rain-lashed promenade,’ which mirrors the oppressive atmosphere. Conversely, a simple subject-verb-object clause after a complex sentence offers a moment of stark clarity. Examiners look for candidates who manipulate morphology and syntax to create specific effects, showing an awareness of language as a crafted medium rather than a transparent window.

词类也能有力地塑造意义。前置修饰语串，即在名词前堆叠形容词，可以营造出稠密感，使读者应接不暇，例如“一条凄凉、破败、被雨水冲刷的步道”，这映照出压抑的氛围。相反，在一个复杂的句子之后，一个简单的主谓宾从句能带来一种鲜明的清晰感。考官寻找的是那些能操纵词法和句法以创造特定效果的考生，能展示出语言是精雕细琢的媒介，而非透明窗户的意识。

6. Syntactic Variety for Rhetorical Effect | 为修辞效果而进行的句法变化

Monotonous sentence structures lull the examiner into boredom; a controlled variety signals a writer in full command. A foundation of simple declarative sentences can be highly effective for emphasis, especially after a series of complex, multi-clause sentences. The abruptness jolts the reader. Asyndetic lists strip away conjunctions, accelerating the pace and creating a sense of overwhelming accumulation. Meanwhile, polysyndetic lists slow the reader down with repeated ‘and’ or ‘or,’ adding gravity and weight to each item. Anaphora, the deliberate repetition of a word or phrase at the start of successive clauses, is a classic device for building rhetorical momentum.

单调的句子结构会使考官感到乏味；有控制的多样化则标志着写作者的驾驭能力。一系列复杂、多从句的句子之后，一个简单的陈述句为基础的结构可以非常有效地突出重点。其突兀感会让读者为之一振。无连词并列结构省去了连接词，加快了节奏，制造出一种铺天盖地累积的感觉。而多连词并列结构使用重复的“和”或“或者”使读者放慢速度，为每个条目增添了庄重感和分量。首语重复法，即在连续从句开头刻意重复一个词或短语，是建立修辞势头的经典手法。

Periodic sentences, which delay the main clause until the end, create suspense and force the reader to hold multiple subordinate ideas in mind. Loose sentences, which give the main clause first and then add modifying phrases, feel more relaxed and conversational. Effectively combining periodic and loose structures within a paragraph mirrors the ebb and flow of critical thought. Experiment with these structures in revision by taking a simple statement and expanding it using subordinate clauses, fronted adverbials, and parenthetical asides.

掉尾句将主句推迟到最后，制造悬念，迫使读者将多个从属观点暂存心中。松散句则先给出主句，然后添加修饰短语，感觉更为轻松和口语化。在一个段落内有效结合掉尾句和松散句结构，映照出批判性思维的起伏流动。复习时，通过取一个简单陈述并用从句、前置状语和插入语对其进行扩展，来试验这些结构。

7. The Art of Persuasive and Argumentative Writing | 说服性与议论性写作的艺术

Persuasive writing requires a delicate balance of ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos establishes the writer’s credibility and authority, achieved through a controlled tone and evidence of expertise. Pathos appeals to the reader’s emotions through vivid anecdotes, charged diction, and sympathetic characterisation. Logos provides the rational backbone: statistics, logical progression, and evidence-based reasoning. The most compelling pieces weave these appeals together so that the emotional resonance is grounded in logic, and the logic feels humanely relevant. Avoid crude emotional manipulation; sophisticated persuasion earns trust by displaying a nuanced understanding of the counter-argument before respectfully dismantling it.

说服性写作需要气质、情感和逻辑的微妙平衡。人格气质建立作者的可信度和权威，通过克制的语气和专业知识的证据来实现。情感共鸣通过生动的轶事、富有感染力的措辞和富有同情心的刻画来吸引读者的情感。理性逻辑提供理性的支撑：统计数据、逻辑递进和基于证据的推理。最引人入胜的作品将这些吸引力交织在一起，使情感共鸣立足于逻辑，而逻辑又显得具有人文关怀。避免粗劣的情感操控；高明的说服通过展示对反方论点的细致理解，再予以尊重地反驳，来赢得信任。

Counter-arguments are a powerful tool, demonstrating intellectual integrity. Dedicate a full paragraph to acknowledging a limitation or opposing viewpoint, then counter it decisively. At A-Level, argumentative writing also demands a nuanced thesis; claims of absolute certainty rarely score as highly as those that recognise complexity and grey areas. Qualify your conclusions with careful modal verbs such as ‘suggests,’ ‘indicates,’ and ‘implies,’ which reflect a scholarly caution appropriate to academic discourse.

反方论点是强大的工具，展示出学术诚信。用一整段来承认限制或对立观点，然后果断反击。在A-Level，议论性写作还要求精辟微妙的论点；绝对化的断言很少能得到与那些承认复杂性和灰色地带的论点一样的高分。用谨慎的情态动词修饰您的结论，比如“表明”、“暗示”和“意指”，这反映了学术话语中应有的学术谨慎。

8. Analytical Writing: Close Reading and Commentary | 分析性写作：精读与评注

Analytical writing in CIE exams often involves close reading of an unseen text, where you must identify stylistic features and explain their effects. Begin by reading the text at least twice: once for holistic impression, registering tone and purpose, and again with a pencil, annotating notable features at the level of lexis, syntax, imagery, and discourse structure. Your analysis should not merely feature-spot; it must build a case about the text’s overall strategy. An effective commentary weaves together multiple levels of analysis, showing, for instance, how a text’s fragmented syntax mirrors its thematic preoccupation with societal breakdown.

CIE考试中的分析性写作通常涉及对陌生文本的精读，您必须识别文体特征并解释其效果。首先，至少阅读文本两遍：第一遍为了整体印象，记录语调和目的；第二遍带着铅笔，在词汇、句法、意象和话语结构层面标注显著特征。您的分析不应仅仅是特征罗列，必须构建一个关于文本整体策略的论证。一篇有效的评注将多个分析层面交织在一起，例如，展示文本支离破碎的句法如何映照其在主题上对社会崩溃的关注。

When analysing non-fiction, consider the contextual factors of production and reception. Who is the implied audience, and how does the text position them? Examine graphological features, typography, and visual elements if present, as these carry significant semiotic weight. For literary extracts, focus on voice and tone, distinguishing between the narrator’s attitude and the author’s implied stance. Use precise linguistic terminology accurately: do not merely label a verb as dynamic; explain how its present participle form conveys ongoing, relentless action that immerses the reader in the scene.

在分析非虚构作品时，要考虑生产和接受的语境因素。隐含的读者是谁，文本如何定位他们？如果有图表特征、排版和视觉元素，也要审视，因为这些承载着重要的符号学意义。对于文学选段，要关注声音和语气，区分叙述者的态度和作者隐含的立场。准确使用精确的语言学术语：不要仅仅将一个动词标注为动态动词，还要解释其现在分词形式如何传达正在进行、无情的行为，使读者身临其境。

9. Creative and Directed Writing Tasks | 创意与定向写作任务

Directed writing tasks require you to inhabit a persona and adapt source material into a new form, such as transforming a news report into a speech or a script. The key is to preserve the core facts and ideas from the original while completely changing the register, perspective, and form. If the source is a formal transcript, and you are asked to write a letter, you must recast the information with a personal voice, adding appropriate emotional commentary and rhetorical devices. Do not simply paraphrase: reimagine. A successful transformation demonstrates understanding of how meaning shifts when context changes.

定向写作任务要求您融入一个角色，将源材料改编成新的形式，比如将一篇新闻报道改写成演讲稿或剧本。关键是保留原文的核心事实和思想，同时彻底改变语域、视角和文体。如果源材料是一份正式的文字记录，而您被要求写一封信，您必须以个人的口吻重塑信息，加入适当的情感评论和修辞手法。不要仅仅转述：要重新构想。成功的改写展示了当语境变化时意义如何随之转变的理解。

For original creative writing, controlling narrative perspective is paramount. An omniscient narrator offers panoramic scope but risks detachment; a first-person narrator provides intimate subjectivity but demands a distinct, believable voice. Show rather than tell by using concrete sensory details to evoke setting and emotion. Avoid cliches such as ‘it was a dark and stormy night’; opt instead for a specific, singular detail that suggests the atmosphere without stating it. Structure your narrative with a clear sense of ending; a circular narrative, returning to the opening image with transformed significance, often feels satisfyingly complete.

对于原创创意写作，控制叙事视角至关重要。全知叙事者提供全景视野，但有疏离的风险；第一人称叙事者提供亲密的主观性，但需要一个独特、可信的声音。要展示而非告知，使用具体的感官细节来唤起场景和情感。避免陈词滥调，如“那是一个漆黑的暴风雨之夜”；转而选择一个具体、独特的细节来暗示氛围而不直接陈述。以一种清晰的结束感来构建您的叙事；一个回环叙事，回到开头意象并赋予转变后的意义，往往让人感到圆满。

10. Time Management and Planning Under Pressure | 压力下的时间管理与规划

In a timed examination, efficiency in planning is a superpower. Allocate roughly one-tenth of your total writing time to planning: for a 60-minute essay, spend at least 5 to 7 minutes brainstorming and outlining. Use a rough diagram, a mind map, or a bulleted list to sketch your thesis, topic sentences, and evidence. A plan serves as your map; without it, you risk wandering off-topic, realising in the final five minutes that you have contradicted yourself. Once you have a plan, write with confidence, trusting the structure you have built.

在限时考试中，高效率的规划是一种超能力。大约分配总写作时间的十分之一用于规划：对于60分钟的论文，至少花5到7分钟进行头脑风暴和列提纲。使用粗略的图表、思维导图或项目符号列表来勾勒您的论点、主题句和证据。计划是您的地图；没有它，您可能会偏题，在最后五分钟才意识到自己自相矛盾。一旦有了计划，就满怀信心地写作，相信您构建的结构。

Pacing during writing is equally crucial. If you have three tasks, divide your time strictly and move on when your allocation for a section ends, even if you feel it is imperfect. An unfinished essay is capped at a lower band, while a complete essay with a rushed conclusion can still achieve high marks. Keep an eye on the clock, and when you reach the conclusion stage, reserve enough time to write a decisive, resonant final paragraph that mirrors or develops your introduction without bland repetition.

写作过程中的节奏把控同样至关重要。如果您有三个任务，要严格划分时间，当一个部分的时间分配结束时，即使感觉不够完美也要继续前进。一篇未完成的论文会被限制在较低分数段，而一篇结论仓促但完整的论文仍有希望获得高分。时刻关注时钟，当您进入结论阶段时，要留出足够的时间来撰写一个决定性、有回响的结尾段落，与引言相呼应或发展，而不是乏味重复。

11. Essential Proofreading and Editing Techniques | 必要的校对与编辑技巧

Editing is not a luxury reserved for coursework; it must be built into your exam strategy. Reserve the final five to ten minutes exclusively for a sharp, focused review. Read your essay silently but with articulated mental enunciation, which helps catch awkward phrasing and missing words that the eye might skip over when scanning. Check for common error patterns: subject-verb agreement, comma splices, incorrect apostrophes, and sentence fragments. A clean, accurate script elevates the examiner’s perception of your control.

编辑并不是一项仅限于课程作业的奢侈行为，它必须纳入您的考试策略。预留最后五到十分钟专门进行敏锐、集中的审查。默读您的文章，但在脑中清晰地发声，这有助于捕捉眼睛浏览时可能会跳过的别扭措辞和漏掉的单词。检查常见的错误模式：主谓一致、逗号拼接、错误的撇号和句子片段。一份干净、准确的卷面会提升考官对您掌控能力的认知。

Beyond mere correction, strategic editing also checks the coherence of your argument. Ask yourself: has the thesis been addressed in every paragraph? Does the conclusion introduce a new idea that needed its own paragraph? At this stage, you can insert a caret (^) to add a missing discourse marker, or draw a short line to break a paragraph at a more logical point. Examiners prefer a few neat annotations over a messy, unrevised draft. Practise this editing stage under timed conditions during your revision to make it instinctive.

除了单纯的纠错，策略性编辑还可以检查论证的连贯性。问问自己：每一段都回扣论点了吗？结论是否引入了一个需要独立成段的新观点？在这一阶段，您可以插入一个脱字符（^）来补充缺失的话语标记，或者划一条短线在一个更合乎逻辑的地方分段。考官更喜欢少量整洁的注释，而不是杂乱无章、未经修订的草稿。在复习期间定时练习这个编辑环节，使之成为本能。

12. Exam-Day Mindset and Final Preparation | 考试日心态与最终准备

Confidence on exam day is built through deliberate, reflective practice over the preceding weeks. In the final three days, focus on active recall: reconstruct essay plans from memory, recite key terminology, and rewrite successful paragraphs you have previously drafted. Avoid cramming new content at the last minute; reinforce what you already know and ensure your go-to analytical frameworks are fresh in your mind. Remind yourself that the examiner is not looking for perfection but for a display of engaged, critical intelligence working within the constraints of the task.

考试日的信心是在前几周通过刻意、反思性的练习建立起来的。在最后三天，专注于主动回忆：凭记忆重构论文计划，背诵关键术语，并重写您之前起草过的成功段落。避免在最后一刻死记硬背新内容；巩固您已经掌握的知识，确保您常用的分析框架在脑海中是新鲜的。提醒自己，考官寻找的不是完美，而是在任务限制下展示出投入的、批判性的智慧。

Enter the examination hall with a calm routine: deep breathing, a comfortable pen, and a glance at the clock to pace yourself. Read the question paper thoroughly, underlining command words such as ‘analyse,’ ‘compare,’ or ‘write.’ Trust the skills you have cultivated. Each paragraph you write is an opportunity to demonstrate your understanding; approach the task with intellectual curiosity rather than fear. This mindset shift transforms the examination from a judgment into a conversation, one in which your voice has every right to be heard with clarity and nuance.

以平静的常态进入考场：深呼吸，一支舒适的笔，并看一眼时钟以调整自己的节奏。仔细阅读试卷，在诸如“分析”、“比较”或“写作”等指令词下面划线。相信您已经培养起来的技能。您写的每个段落都是展示您理解力的机会；以知识分子的好奇心而非恐惧来对待任务。这种心态的转变将考试从一场审判转变为一次对话，在这场对话中，您的声音完全有权利被清晰而细致地听到。

Published by TutorHao | English Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）

A-Level CIE English: Writing Skills Exam-Focused Guide | A-Level CIE 英语：写作技巧 考点精讲