IGCSE CAIE History: Unit Test Mock Paper Walkthrough | IGCSE CAIE 历史：单元测试模拟卷解析

📚 IGCSE CAIE History: Unit Test Mock Paper Walkthrough | IGCSE CAIE 历史：单元测试模拟卷解析

This article walks you through a 40-mark unit test modelled on the CAIE IGCSE History 0470 Paper 1 and Paper 2 skills. The focus is Core Content Option A: International Relations, 1919-39, but the same method works for other IGCSE History units.

本文带你解析一套 40 分制的单元测试模拟卷，模拟 CAIE IGCSE 历史 0470 Paper 1 和 Paper 2 的考查技能。本卷重点关注核心内容选项 A：1919-1939 年国际关系，但同样的解题方法也适用于 IGCSE 历史其他单元。

1. Mock Paper Overview | 模拟卷概览

This mock unit test has three questions. Question 1 is source-based and tests inference, purpose and comparison skills. Question 2 asks for an explanation of why the League of Nations failed to stop aggression in the 1930s. Question 3 is a judgement essay on appeasement and the outbreak of the Second World War.

本套模拟单元测试共有三题。第 1 题为史料分析题，考查推断、目的和比较能力。第 2 题要求解释国际联盟为何未能在 1930 年代制止侵略。第 3 题是一道关于绥靖政策与第二次世界大战爆发的判断性论述题。

The total is 40 marks and the suggested working time is 70 minutes. Question 1 is worth 15 marks, Question 2 worth 10 marks and Question 3 worth 15 marks. The question styles match the CAIE assessment objectives AO1, AO2 and AO3.

试卷总分为 40 分，建议作答时间为 70 分钟。第 1 题 15 分，第 2 题 10 分，第 3 题 15 分。题目风格对应 CAIE 的评估目标 AO1、AO2 和 AO3。

---

2. How to Use the Mark Scheme | 如何使用评分标准

CAIE IGCSE History rewards three main skills. AO1 is recall and use of knowledge. AO2 is source analysis, including inference, message, purpose and cross-reference. AO3 is explanation and judgement, especially in essay answers.

CAIE IGCSE 历史主要考查三种能力。AO1 是回忆和运用史实。AO2 是史料分析，包括推断、信息、目的和交叉对比。AO3 是解释和判断，尤其体现在论述题中。

Command words matter. “Describe” asks for what happened. “Explain” asks for causes, consequences or connections. “How far do you agree” asks for a balanced judgement. Always check how many marks are offered because that shows how much depth to include.

指令词非常重要。”Describe” 要求写出发生了什么。”Explain” 要求分析原因、后果或联系。”How far do you agree” 要求给出平衡的判断。一定要看题目给多少分，因为分值提示了答案需要多深。

---

3. Question 1(a): Source Inference | 第 1(a) 题：史料推断

Source A: From a British political cartoon, 1919. It shows Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Wilson forcing a huge bag labelled “reparations” onto a struggling Germany. The caption says: “The future? Let Germany pay.”

资料来源 A：出自 1919 年英国政治漫画。画中克里孟梭、劳合·乔治和威尔逊把一个标有 “reparations” 的巨额赔款袋压到苦苦挣扎的德国身上。标题文字为：”The future? Let Germany pay.”

Question 1(a): Study Source A. What is the cartoonist’s message about the Treaty of Versailles? Support your answer with details from the source. (4 marks)

问题 1(a)：阅读资料来源 A。漫画作者对《凡尔赛条约》传递了什么信息？用来源中的细节支持你的答案。(4 分)

A full-mark answer needs two valid inferences supported by source details. Avoid simply describing the cartoon. For example, the message is that the Allied leaders were punishing Germany too harshly. The detail “Let Germany pay” shows a one-sided demand for reparations. A second inference is that the peace would create future resentment, because Germany is shown struggling under the load.

满分答案需要两个有效推断，并用来源细节支撑。避免只描述漫画。例如，信息是协约国领导人惩罚德国过重。细节 “Let Germany pay” 表明对赔款的单方面索取。第二个推断是这种和平会制造未来的怨恨，因为德国在重压之下挣扎。

Model answer: “The cartoonist’s message is that the Treaty of Versailles was vindictive and economically crushing. The image of Germany struggling under a huge reparations bag supports this. The cartoon also implies the Big Three did not think about long-term peace, as the caption ‘The future?’ is answered only by ‘Let Germany pay’.”

模型答案：”漫画作者的信息是《凡尔赛条约》具有报复性且在经济上具有压垮性。德国在巨额赔款袋下挣扎的画面支持了这一点。漫画还暗示三巨头没有考虑长期和平，因为标题 ‘The future?’ 的回答只是 ‘Let Germany pay’。”

---

4. Question 1(b): Purpose and Context | 第 1(b) 题：目的与背景

Source B: From a speech by Haile Selassie to the League of Nations, June 1936. “I ask the nations of the world, who have promised collective security, to act now. If not, they will one day face the same aggression.”

资料来源 B：出自海尔·塞拉西 1936 年 6 月在国际联盟的演讲。”我请求世界各成员国，你们曾承诺集体安全，现在请采取行动。如果你们不行动，有一天你们将面对同样的侵略。”

Question 1(b): Study Source B. Why did Haile Selassie make this speech to the League of Nations in 1936? Use details from the source and your own knowledge. (6 marks)

问题 1(b)：阅读资料来源 B。为什么海尔·塞拉西于 1936 年在国际联盟发表这一演讲？使用来源细节和你自己的知识作答。(6 分)

A strong answer will explain the message and purpose, then connect both to context. The source says the League had “promised collective security”, which shows Haile Selassie wanted to remind member states of their obligation. He was responding to Italy’s 1935 invasion of Abyssinia. The League had only imposed limited sanctions and had not closed the Suez Canal or banned oil sales, so Italy was able to continue the war.

高分答案会解释信息和目的，并把二者与背景联系起来。来源说国际联盟 “promised collective security”，这表明海尔·塞拉西想提醒成员国履行义务。他是在回应意大利 1935 年对阿比西尼亚的入侵。国际联盟仅实施了有限制裁，没有关闭苏伊士运河或禁止石油销售，因此意大利得以继续战争。

Model answer: “Haile Selassie wanted to persuade League members to take stronger action against Italy. By saying they had ‘promised collective security’, he exposed their failure to protect Abyssinia. His purpose was also to warn that weak responses would encourage future aggression. My own knowledge shows that Italy used chemical weapons and annexed Abyssinia, and by 1936 the Emperor could only appeal because the League had not stopped the invasion.”

模型答案：”海尔·塞拉西想说服国际联盟成员国对意大利采取更强有力的行动。他说它们曾 ‘promised collective security’，揭露了它们未能保护阿比西尼亚。他的目的还在于警告，软弱的回应将鼓励未来的侵略。我的背景知识显示，意大利使用了化学武器并吞并了阿比西尼亚，到 1936 年皇帝只能发出呼吁，因为国际联盟未能制止入侵。”

---

5. Question 1(c): Source Comparison | 第 1(c) 题：史料比较

Source C: From a modern historian writing about the League of Nations. “The League was not a complete failure in the 1920s, but its machinery could only work when the great powers wanted it to work.”

资料来源 C：出自一位现代历史学家关于国际联盟的论述。”国际联盟在 1920 年代并非完全失败，但只有当大国愿意让它运作时，它的机制才能发挥作用。”

Question 1(c): Study Sources A and C. How far does Source C explain the situation shown in Source A? Use details from both sources and your own knowledge. (5 marks)

问题 1(c)：阅读资料来源 A 和 C。资料来源 C 在多大程度上解释了资料来源 A 所显示的情况？使用两个来源的细节和你自己的知识作答。(5 分)

This question asks you to compare ideas, not just match pictures. Source C explains that the League’s effectiveness depended on great powers. Source A shows great powers imposing a harsh peace, which suggests they cared more about national interests than collective security. So Source C partly explains the longer-term weakness visible in Source A: a settlement based on punishment rather than cooperation.

这道题要求比较观点，而不是简单匹配画面。资料来源 C 解释说国际联盟的有效性取决于大国。资料来源 A 展示大国强加苛刻的和平，这表明它们更关心本国利益而非集体安全。因此资料来源 C 部分解释了资料来源 A 中可见的长期弱点：一个基于惩罚而非合作的和平方案。

However, Source C does not fully explain Source A. The cartoon focuses on the Treaty of Versailles, while Source C focuses on the League’s machinery after 1920. Own knowledge helps here: the League was weakened by the absence of the USA, the lack of an army and the self-interest of Britain and France. These factors link the bitterness of Versailles to the League’s later failures.

但是，资料来源 C 并未完全解释资料来源 A。漫画聚焦于《凡尔赛条约》，而资料来源 C 聚焦于 1920 年后国际联盟的机制。这里需要运用背景知识：国际联盟

Published by TutorHao | IGCSE History Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）