📚 The Main Powers of the House of Lords | 英国上议院的主要权力
The House of Lords, as the upper chamber of the UK Parliament, plays a vital revising and scrutinising role in the legislative process. Although it is not elected and its powers are limited by statute and convention, it remains an influential body that can challenge the government, improve legislation, and hold the executive to account.
英国上议院作为英国议会的上院，在立法过程中扮演着重要的审查和修改角色。尽管上议院并非选举产生，其权力受到成文法和宪政惯例的限制，但它仍然是一个有影响力的机构，能够挑战政府、改进立法并监督行政部门。
1. Legislative Revision and Amendment | 立法审查与修订权
The House of Lords spends much of its time examining bills that have been passed by the House of Commons. It can propose amendments to improve the quality of legislation, close loopholes, and clarify ambiguous wording. Because many peers are experts in fields such as law, medicine, science, and business, their scrutiny often leads to more workable and coherent laws.
上议院花大量时间审查下议院已通过的法案。它可以提出修正案，以提高立法质量、堵住漏洞并澄清模糊的措辞。由于许多上议院议员是法律、医学、科学和商业等领域的专家，他们的审查往往使法律更具可操作性和连贯性。
Unlike the Commons, where party discipline is strong and government majorities usually prevail, the Lords contains a large number of crossbenchers and independent peers. This means that amendments are often considered on their merits rather than purely along party lines, making the revising role particularly effective.
与政党纪律严明、政府多数通常占优的下议院不同，上议院中有大量中立议员和独立议员。这意味着修正案通常根据其本身的价值来审议，而不是纯粹按党派路线划分，这使得上议院的修订职能尤为有效。
2. Suspensive Veto and the Parliament Acts | 搁置否决权与议会法案
The House of Lords no longer has an absolute veto over primary legislation. Under the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949, the Lords can only delay most bills passed by the Commons for up to one year. If the Commons passes the same bill again in the following session, it can receive royal assent without the consent of the Lords.
上议院对主要立法不再拥有绝对否决权。根据1911年和1949年的议会法案，上议院只能将下议院通过的大多数法案延迟最多一年。如果下议院在下一会期再次通过同一法案，该法案可在未经上议院同意的情况下获得御准。
This suspensive veto means that the Lords can force the government and the Commons to reconsider controversial measures, but it cannot permanently block the elected chamber’s will. The provision gives the Lords a real but limited power to encourage compromise and public debate.
这种搁置否决权意味着上议院可以迫使政府和下议院重新考虑有争议的措施，但不能永久阻挠民选议院的意志。这一规定赋予上议院真实但有限的权力，以鼓励妥协和公共辩论。
3. Money Bills and Financial Restrictions | 财政法案与财政限制
Under the Parliament Act 1911, the House of Lords has virtually no power over ‘money bills’, which are bills solely concerned with taxation or public expenditure. The Speaker of the House of Commons certifies whether a bill is a money bill, and such bills can receive royal assent after only one month, even without the Lords’ approval.
根据1911年议会法案，上议院对“财政法案”几乎没有任何权力。财政法案是仅涉及税收或公共开支的法案。下议院议长负责认证某法案是否为财政法案，这类法案即使没有上议院的批准，也只需一个月即可获得御准。
This restriction reflects the democratic principle that taxation and public spending must be controlled by the elected chamber. The Lords may debate money bills but cannot amend or delay them in any meaningful way, which preserves the financial supremacy of the House of Commons.
这一限制反映了民主原则，即税收和公共开支必须由民选议院控制。上议院可以就财政法案进行辩论，但不能以任何有意义的方式修改或拖延，这保住了下议院在财政上的至高地位。
4. Scrutiny of Secondary Legislation | 对次级立法的审查
Secondary legislation, also known as delegated legislation, includes statutory instruments made by ministers under powers granted by an Act of Parliament. The House of Lords has a Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee that examines these instruments and can draw attention to those that are politically or legally important, or that may have unintended consequences.
次级立法，又称授权立法，包括大臣根据议会法案授予的权力制定的法定文书。上议院设有次级立法审查委员会，负责审查这些文书，并可以提请注意那些具有政治或法律重要性、或可能产生意外后果的文书。
Although the Lords cannot amend statutory instruments, it can pass a motion to regret them or, in rare cases, vote to reject them. This scrutiny function is increasingly significant because a large volume of law is now made through delegated powers rather than full parliamentary bills.
尽管上议院不能修改法定文书，但它可以通过动议表示遗憾，或在极少数情况下投票否决它们。这一审查职能日益重要，因为现在大量法律是通过授权权力而非完整的议会法案制定的。
5. Debates and Private Members’ Bills | 辩论与私人议员法案
The House of Lords provides a forum for high-quality debate on a wide range of national and international issues. Peers with specialist knowledge can raise matters that may not be prioritised in the Commons, and their debates often attract media attention and influence public opinion.
上议院为广泛的国家和国际问题提供了高质量辩论的论坛。具有专业知识的上议院议员可以提出下议院可能不会优先处理的事项，他们的辩论常常引起媒体关注并影响公众舆论。
Peers can also introduce private members’ bills, which are bills not part of the government’s legislative programme. While these bills rarely become law without government support, they can raise awareness of important social issues and sometimes lead to changes in government policy.
上议院议员还可以提出私人议员法案，即不属于政府立法计划的法案。虽然这些法案在缺乏政府支持的情况下很少成为法律，但它们可以提高对重要社会问题的认识，有时还能促使政府改变政策。
6. Investigative Committees and Government Accountability | 调查委员会与政府问责
The House of Lords has a number of select committees that conduct detailed inquiries into policy areas such as the economy, the constitution, international relations, science and technology, and the environment. These committees take evidence from ministers, civil servants, experts, and the public, and publish authoritative reports.
上议院设有多个特别委员会，对经济、宪法、国际关系、科学技术和环境等政策领域进行详细调查。这些委员会从大臣、公务员、专家和公众那里收集证据，并发布权威报告。
Because committee members are often less constrained by party politics than MPs, their reports can be highly critical of the government and are respected for their independence. This scrutiny helps to hold the executive to account between elections and can influence government policy.
由于委员会成员通常比下议院议员更少受党派政治的约束，他们的报告可以对政府进行高度批评，并因其独立性而受到尊重。这种审查有助于在两次选举之间对行政部门进行问责，并能影响政府政策。
7. Constitutional Safeguard and Checks on the Commons | 宪法守护与对下议院的制衡
The House of Lords is often described as a constitutional safeguard because it can delay legislation that might threaten fundamental rights, the rule of law, or the balance of the constitution. It can act as a check on a government with a large majority in the Commons, preventing hasty or ill-considered constitutional changes.
上议院常被描述为宪法守护者，因为它可以延迟可能威胁基本权利、法治或宪法平衡的立法。它可以对在下议院拥有大量多数席位的政府形成制衡，防止仓促或考虑不周的宪法变革。
Although the Lords cannot ultimately block a determined government, its ability to force delay and public scrutiny means that controversial constitutional reforms are often debated more thoroughly. This role is especially important in the absence of a written constitution in the UK.
尽管上议院最终无法阻止一个坚定的政府，但它能够强制拖延和公众审查，这意味着有争议的宪法改革往往会被更彻底地讨论。在英国没有成文宪法的情况下，这一角色尤为重要。
8. Judicial Functions: Past and Present | 司法职能：过去与现在
Historically, the House of Lords served as the highest court of appeal in the United Kingdom through its Appellate Committee, made up of the Law Lords. This judicial role lasted for centuries until the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 established a separate Supreme Court, which began operating in 2009.
历史上，上议院通过其上诉委员会（由常任上诉法官组成）担任联合王国的最高上诉法院。这一司法职能延续了数个世纪，直到2005年宪法改革法案设立了独立的最高法院，该法院于2009年开始运作。
Since 2009, the House of Lords no longer has a judicial function, and the Law Lords became the first justices of the Supreme Court. However, the Lord Speaker and other parliamentary officers still perform certain ceremonial duties linked to the old judicial role.
自2009年以来，上议院不再具有司法职能，常任上诉法官成为最高法院的第一批法官。然而，上议院议长和其他议会官员仍履行与旧司法职能相关的某些礼仪性职责。
9. Relationship with the House of Commons | 与下议院的关系
The House of Lords is subordinate to the elected House of Commons in all matters of legislation and finance. By convention, the government is accountable to the Commons, and the Prime Minister and most senior ministers sit in the lower house. The Lords must ultimately give way to the will of the Commons.
上议院在所有立法和财政事务上都从属于民选的下议院。按照惯例，政府向下议院负责，首相和大多数高级大臣坐在下议院。上议院最终必须服从下议院的意志。
There are also conventions that govern the relationship between the two houses, such as the Salisbury Convention, which states that the Lords should not block legislation that was promised in the governing party’s election manifesto. This convention reinforces the democratic legitimacy of the Commons.
两院之间的关系还受到一些惯例的约束，例如索尔兹伯里惯例，规定上议院不应阻挠执政党在竞选宣言中承诺的立法。这一惯例强化了下议院的民主合法性。
10. The Future of the House of Lords | 上议院的未来
The powers and composition of the House of Lords remain subjects of ongoing political debate. Many groups argue for an elected or partially elected second chamber, while others defend the current appointed model for its expertise and independence. Proposals for reform have included reducing the size of the house, introducing term limits, and removing hereditary peers.
上议院的权力和组成仍是持续政治辩论的主题。许多团体主张建立选举产生或部分选举产生的第二院，而另一些人则捍卫现行任命模式，因为它具有专业知识和独立性。改革建议包括缩小上议院规模、引入任期限制以及取消世袭贵族。
Despite repeated calls for reform, no major constitutional change has been achieved since 1999, when most hereditary peers were removed. The House of Lords continues to function as a revising and scrutinising chamber, but its long-term future remains uncertain.
尽管多次呼吁改革，但自1999年大多数世袭贵族被取消以来，尚未实现任何重大宪法变革。上议院继续作为审查和监督机构运作，但其长期未来仍不确定。
Published by TutorHao | Government and Politics Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导