📚 The Role and Composition of the Supreme Court | 最高法院的角色与组成
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is the highest court in the land, operating as the final court of appeal for most civil cases across the UK and for criminal cases in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It was established by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and began sitting in October 2009, replacing the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. Understanding its role and composition is essential for A-Level Government and Politics, as it illustrates the separation of powers, judicial independence and the limits of parliamentary sovereignty.
英国最高法院是英国的最高法院，作为大多数民事案件以及英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰刑事案件的最终上诉法院。它根据2005年《宪法改革法》设立，并于2009年10月开始运作，取代了上议院上诉委员会。理解其角色和组成对A-Level政治学至关重要，因为它体现了权力分立、司法独立以及议会主权的限度。
1. Historical Background and Establishment | 历史背景与设立
Before 2009, the highest court of appeal in the UK was the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. Its judges were known as the Law Lords, and they combined judicial functions with membership of the upper house of Parliament. This overlap between the judiciary and the legislature raised concerns about the separation of powers.
2009年之前，英国的最高上诉法院是上议院上诉委员会。其法官被称为上议院常任上诉法官，他们既行使司法职能，又是上议院成员。这种司法与立法的重叠引发了对权力分立的担忧。
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 created a separate Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The new court began work in October 2009 and moved into the Middlesex Guildhall building on Parliament Square. This change strengthened the formal separation between the judiciary and Parliament.
《2005年宪法改革法》设立了独立的英国最高法院。新法院于2009年10月开始运作，并迁入议会广场的米德尔塞克斯市政厅大楼。这一变化加强了司法与议会之间的正式分离。
The establishment of the Supreme Court did not alter the substantive law applied by the final appeal court. It was primarily an institutional reform that made judicial independence more visible to the public and to the political branches of government.
最高法院的设立并未改变终审上诉法院所适用的实体法律。它主要是一项机构改革，使司法独立对公众和政府政治部门更加清晰可见。
2. Composition: Number of Justices | 组成：法官人数
The Supreme Court is made up of 12 full-time judges, known as Justices of the Supreme Court. The number is fixed by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, although it can be increased by order if the workload requires additional judges.
最高法院由12名全职法官组成，称为最高法院大法官。《2005年宪法改革法》规定了这一人数，但若工作量需要增加法官，也可以通过命令予以增多。
The court may also sit with a larger panel by using acting judges. These acting judges, known as supplemental panel members, are senior judges drawn from other courts or retired Supreme Court justices. However, the core composition remains 12 permanent justices.
法院也可以通过使用临时法官组成较大的合议庭。这些临时法官称为补充小组成员，是来自其他法院的高级法官或退休的最高法院大法官。但核心组成仍为12名常任大法官。
A quorum for most cases is an odd number of justices, usually 5, 7 or 9, depending on the importance and complexity of the legal issues. An odd number prevents a tied vote and allows a majority decision to be reached.
大多数案件的法定人数为奇数名大法官，通常为5名、7名或9名，取决于法律问题的重要性和复杂性。奇数人数可以避免票数相等，并能够形成多数裁决。
3. The President and Deputy President | 院长与副院长
The Supreme Court is led by a President, who is the most senior judge of the court. The President oversees the administration of the court, chairs the selection commission for new justices, and presides over the most significant hearings.
最高法院由院长领导，院长是法院中最高级别的法官。院长负责监督法院的行政管理、主持新法官遴选委员会，并主持最重要的听证会。
The Deputy President assists the President and assumes the President’s duties when the President is unavailable. Both the President and Deputy President are appointed from among the existing justices or from outside the court, and they hold these leadership positions for a fixed term before returning to ordinary judicial work.
副院长协助院长，并在院长无法履职时承担院长职责。院长和副院长均从现任大法官中或从法院外部任命，他们担任这些领导职务一段固定任期，随后恢复普通审判工作。
The roles of President and Deputy President are important for the coherent management of the court. They also represent the judiciary in public and in dealings with the government, safeguarding the institutional independence of the court.
院长和副院长的角色对于法院的协调管理非常重要。他们还代表司法机构面对公众和与政府打交道，维护法院的机构独立性。
4. Appointment of Justices | 法官的任命
Justices of the Supreme Court are appointed through an independent selection commission. The commission includes the President and Deputy President of the Supreme Court, together with members of the judicial appointments bodies for England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.
最高法院大法官通过独立的遴选委员会任命。该委员会包括最高法院院长和副院长，以及英格兰和威尔士、苏格兰、北爱尔兰司法任命机构的成员。
The selection commission recommends one candidate to the Lord Chancellor, who may accept or reject the recommendation. The successful candidate is then formally appointed by the monarch on the advice of the Prime Minister. This process minimises direct political influence over judicial appointments.
遴选委员会向大法官（司法大臣）推荐一名候选人，大法官可以接受或拒绝该推荐。随后，成功候选人由君主根据首相的建议正式任命。这一程序最大限度地减少了政治对法官任命的直接影响。
Candidates must have held high judicial office for at least two years or have been a qualifying practitioner for at least 15 years. This requirement ensures that only experienced and senior legal professionals are considered for the role.
候选人必须担任高级司法职务至少两年，或作为合格执业律师至少15年。这一要求确保只有经验丰富和资深的司法专业人士才能被考虑担任该职务。
5. Jurisdiction: Final Court of Appeal | 管辖权：最终上诉法院
The Supreme Court is the final court of appeal for all civil cases in the United Kingdom. It also hears criminal appeals from England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Criminal cases in Scotland are finally determined by the High Court of Justiciary, not by the Supreme Court.
最高法院是联合王国所有民事案件的最终上诉法院。它还审理来自英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的刑事上诉。苏格兰的刑事案件由苏格兰高等刑事法院最终裁决，而不由最高法院审理。
The court only hears cases that raise points of law of general public importance. Parties must usually seek permission to appeal, and only a small number of cases are granted leave each year. This filter allows the court to focus on the most significant legal questions.
最高法院只审理具有普遍公共重要性的法律问题。当事人通常必须申请上诉许可，每年只有少量案件获得许可。这一筛选机制使法院能够专注于最重要的法律问题。
In addition to appeals, the Supreme Court can also be asked to give advisory opinions in limited circumstances, although this power is rarely used. Its primary function remains the authoritative resolution of disputes through binding judgments.
除上诉外，最高法院在有限情形下也可被请求提供咨询意见，但这一权力很少行使。其主要职能仍然是通过具有约束力的判决来解决争议。
6. Judicial Review of Executive Actions | 对行政行为的司法审查
The Supreme Court has an important constitutional role in reviewing the lawfulness of executive actions. It can examine decisions made by government ministers, public bodies and regulators to ensure they act within their legal powers and follow fair procedures.
最高法院在审查行政行为合法性方面具有重要的宪法作用。它可以审查政府部长、公共机构和监管机构作出的决定，确保它们在法律权限内行事并遵循公平程序。
Judicial review is based on principles such as illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety. If a public body exceeds its powers, acts unreasonably or fails to provide a fair hearing, the court can quash the decision and require it to be taken again lawfully.
司法审查基于不合法、不合理和程序不当等原则。如果公共机构超越权限、行为不合理或未能提供公平听证，法院可以撤销该决定并要求依法重新作出。
However, the Supreme Court cannot strike down an Act of Parliament through judicial review. This limitation reflects the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, which means that Parliament, not the courts, is the supreme law-making body in the UK.
然而，最高法院不能通过司法审查推翻议会法案。这一限制反映了议会主权原则，即议会而非法院是英国的最高立法机构。
7. Devolution and Constitutional Disputes | 权力下放与宪法争议
The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in the UK’s devolution settlement. It hears disputes about whether the Scottish Parliament, the Welsh Senedd or the Northern Ireland Assembly has exceeded its legislative competence.
最高法院在英国的权力下放安排中扮演着关键角色。它审理关于苏格兰议会、威尔士议会或北爱尔兰议会是否超越其立法权限的争议。
Devolved legislatures can only pass laws on matters within their devolved powers. If a law falls outside those powers or conflicts with reserved matters, the Supreme Court can declare it to be outside competence, which means it has no legal effect.
权力下放的立法机构只能就下放权力范围内的事项通过法律。如果一项法律超出这些权力或与保留事项冲突，最高法院可以宣布其越权，这意味着该法律没有法律效力。
These cases are often highly significant constitutionally. They define the boundaries between central government and the devolved administrations, and they help maintain a coherent legal order across the United Kingdom.
这些案件往往具有重大宪法意义。它们界定了中央政府与权力下放机构之间的边界，并有助于维护整个联合王国法律秩序的一致性。
8. Human Rights and Declarations of Incompatibility | 人权与不兼容声明
Under the Human Rights Act 1998, the Supreme Court must interpret legislation in a way that is compatible with the rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights, where possible. If legislation cannot be read compatibly, the court can issue a declaration of incompatibility.
根据《1998年人权法》，最高法院必须尽可能以符合《欧洲人权公约》规定权利的方式解释立法。如果立法不能被解释为兼容，法院可以发布不兼容声明。
A declaration of incompatibility does not invalidate the Act of Parliament concerned. It signals to Parliament that the law breaches a Convention right, and Parliament then decides whether to amend the law. This preserves parliamentary sovereignty while protecting human rights.
不兼容声明并不会使相关议会法案无效。它向议会表明该法律违反了公约权利，议会随后决定是否修改法律。这既维护了议会主权，又保护了人权。
The Supreme Court has issued declarations of incompatibility in a number of high-profile cases, for example concerning the rights of transgender individuals and the blanket ban on prisoner voting. These declarations often lead to legislative reform, though sometimes after considerable delay.
最高法院在若干重大案件中发布了不兼容声明，例如涉及跨性别者权利和囚犯投票全面禁令的案件。这些声明往往导致立法改革，尽管有时在相当长的拖延之后才发生。
9. Relationship with EU Law | 与欧盟法的关系
Before the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, the Supreme Court was required to give effect to directly applicable EU law and to interpret domestic law in line with EU directives. EU law took precedence over conflicting national legislation in many areas.
在英国退出欧盟之前，最高法院必须实施直接适用的欧盟法，并按照欧盟指令解释国内法。在许多领域，欧盟法优先于与之冲突的国内立法。
After Brexit, the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 created a new category of retained EU law. The Supreme Court continues to interpret and apply retained EU law, but Parliament now has the power to amend or repeal it through ordinary legislation.
脱欧后，《2018年欧盟（退出）法》创建了一类新的保留欧盟法。最高法院继续解释和适用保留欧盟法，但议会现在有权通过普通立法修改或废除它。
The Supreme Court therefore remains involved in cases concerning the interpretation of retained EU law and the transition from EU membership. Its role has shifted from enforcing EU supremacy to resolving domestic legal questions arising from the retained legal framework.
因此，最高法院仍参与涉及保留欧盟法解释以及退出欧盟后过渡期的案件。其角色已从执行欧盟法优先性转变为解决由保留法律框架产生的国内法律问题。
10. Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Limits of Judicial Power | 议会主权与司法权力的限度
The Supreme Court operates within the framework of parliamentary sovereignty, a core principle of the UK constitution. This means the court cannot strike down or disapply primary legislation passed by Parliament.
最高法院在议会主权这一英国宪法核心原则的框架内运作。这意味着法院不能推翻或不适用议会通过的基础立法。
However, the court has developed techniques to ensure legislation is interpreted consistently with fundamental rights and the rule of law. For example, under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998, it can read down legislation to make it compatible with Convention rights wherever possible.
然而，法院已发展出一些方法，确保立法被解释为符合基本权利和法治。例如，根据《1998年人权法》第3条，法院可以在可能的情况下对立法作狭义解释，使其符合公约权利。
In exceptional cases, such as R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, the Supreme Court has ruled on the lawful process for triggering Article 50. This demonstrated that the court can constrain the executive even in matters of major political significance, without challenging parliamentary sovereignty itself.
在特殊案件中，例如R（米勒）诉退出欧盟事务大臣案，最高法院就触发第50条的合法程序作出了裁决。这表明法院即使在重大政治问题上也能约束行政机关，同时并不挑战议会主权本身。
11. Judicial Independence and Security of Tenure | 司法独立与任期保障
Judicial independence is protected by the security of tenure of Supreme Court justices. Justices hold office until the age of 75 and can only be removed by an address passed by both Houses of Parliament, on grounds of proven misbehaviour or incapacity.
司法独立受到最高法院大法官任期保障的保护。大法官任职至75岁，只有在两院通过决议且基于已证实的不当行为或丧失行为能力的情况下，才能被免职。
Justices’ salaries are paid directly from the Consolidated Fund, meaning they are not subject to annual political debate or approval by ministers. This financial independence shields the court from pressure by the executive or legislature.
大法官的薪金直接从统一基金支付，这意味着薪金不需要经过每年的政治辩论或部长的批准。这种财务独立性使法院免受行政机关或立法机关的压力。
These protections ensure that justices can decide cases according to law and conscience, without fear of dismissal or financial penalty. They are a fundamental feature of the rule of law and public confidence in the justice system.
这些保障确保大法官能够根据法律和良心裁决案件，而不必担心被解职或受到经济处罚。它们是法治和公众对司法系统信心的基本特征。
12. Criticisms and Debates | 批评与争议
The Supreme Court has faced criticism from some politicians and commentators who argue that unelected judges have become too powerful. They claim that the court sometimes makes decisions that are political rather than purely legal, especially in cases involving human rights, devolution and executive power.
最高法院面临一些政治家和评论员的批评，他们认为未经选举的法官权力过大。他们声称法院有时作出的裁决是政治性的而非纯粹法律性的，尤其是在涉及人权、权力下放和行政权力的案件中。
Another criticism concerns the composition of the court. Justices have historically come from a narrow social and educational background, and there are ongoing debates about the need for greater diversity in terms of gender, ethnicity and professional experience.
另一项批评涉及法院的组成。大法官历来来自狭窄的社会和教育背景，关于性别、族裔和专业经验方面需要更多多样性的辩论仍在继续。
Defenders of the Supreme Court respond that judicial review and human rights protection are essential checks on government power. They argue that the court applies the law objectively and that any perceived political impact arises from the inherently political nature of the cases brought before it.
最高法院的辩护者回应说，司法审查和人权保护是对政府权力的必要制约。他们认为法院客观地适用法律，任何被认为的政治影响都源于提交给法院的案件本身具有的政治性质。
Published by TutorHao | Government and Politics Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导