CIE AS Religious Studies: Divinity Exam Strategy & Past Paper Analysis | CIE AS 宗教：Divinity 备考攻略与真题解析

📚 CIE AS Religious Studies: Divinity Exam Strategy & Past Paper Analysis | CIE AS 宗教：Divinity 备考攻略与真题解析

The CIE AS Level Religious Studies (Divinity) specification challenges students to engage deeply with philosophical arguments, biblical texts, and ethical reasoning. Unlike many humanities subjects, Divinity requires both precise textual knowledge and the ability to construct coherent, evaluative arguments under timed conditions. This guide breaks down the syllabus, common question types, and proven strategies to help you maximise your grade.

CIE AS 级别宗教研究（Divinity）课程要求学生深入理解哲学论证、圣经文本与伦理推理。与许多人文学科不同，Divinity 既要求精确的文本知识，也要求在规定时间内构建连贯且有评价性的论证能力。本指南将系统拆解考纲、常见题型以及经过验证的备考策略，帮助你最大化分数。

1. Understanding the Syllabus & Assessment Objectives | 理解考纲与评估目标

The CIE AS Divinity syllabus (code 9011 or equivalent) is typically divided into two papers: Paper 1 focuses on Biblical studies (Old Testament or New Testament), while Paper 2 covers philosophy of religion and ethics. Each paper requires candidates to demonstrate knowledge, understanding, and evaluation.

CIE AS Divinity 考纲（代码 9011 或同等版本）通常分为两卷：卷一聚焦圣经研究（旧约或新约），卷二涵盖宗教哲学与伦理学。每卷都要求考生展示知识、理解与评价能力。

Three assessment objectives matter for your final grade:

三个评估目标直接影响你的最终成绩：

AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding: Recall accurate facts, concepts, and textual references. This is the foundation of every answer.
AO1 – 知识与理解：准确回忆事实、概念与文本引用。这是每道答案的基础。
AO2 – Analysis and Evaluation: Critically examine arguments, compare different viewpoints, and reach a justified conclusion.
AO2 – 分析与评价：批判性审视论证，比较不同观点，并得出有依据的结论。
AO3 – Synthesis and Communication: Present ideas logically, use appropriate terminology, and structure your essay coherently.
AO3 – 综合与表达：逻辑清晰地呈现观点，使用恰当的术语，并构建连贯的篇章结构。

In the exam, AO1 and AO2 are weighted roughly equally. A common mistake is writing a purely descriptive answer, which caps your mark at a mid-level. You must reserve at least one-third of your essay for evaluation.

在考试中，AO1 与 AO2 权重大致相等。一个常见错误是写成纯描述性答案，这会使你的分数停留在中等水平。你必须留出至少三分之一的篇幅进行评价。

2. Core Topics Breakdown | 核心考点拆解

For the Old Testament option, key topics include the nature of God, covenant, prophecy, and the concept of righteousness. In the New Testament, focus on the Gospel of Luke or John, particularly themes of salvation, discipleship, and miracles.

就旧约选项而言，核心考点包括上帝的本性、圣约、预言与公义的概念。在新约中，重点通常放在《路加福音》或《约翰福音》，尤其是拯救、门徒身份与神迹等主题。

In Philosophy of Religion, the standard units are:

在宗教哲学中，标准单元包括：

The cosmological argument – arguments from contingency and causation (e.g., Aquinas, Leibniz).
宇宙论论证 – 从偶然性与因果性出发的论证（如阿奎那、莱布尼茨）。
The teleological (design) argument – Paley’s watch, irreducible complexity, and Darwinian challenges.
目的论（设计）论证 – 佩利的怀表、不可化约的复杂性以及达尔文主义的挑战。
The problem of evil – the inconsistent triad, theodicies (Augustine, Irenaeus), and free will defences.
恶的问题 – 不一致三元组、神义论（奥古斯丁、爱任纽）与自由意志辩护。
Religious experience – verification, falsification, and the nature of mystical encounters.
宗教经验 – 证实、证伪与神秘体验的本质。

In Ethics, the main areas are natural law, situation ethics, and applied issues such as abortion, euthanasia, and just war.

在伦理学中，主要领域包括自然律、处境伦理以及堕胎、安乐死与正义战争等应用议题。

3. Exam Structure and Question Types | 考试结构与题型

CIE AS Divinity papers typically require you to answer two or three essay questions from a choice of six. Each essay is worth 25 or 30 marks. The first part of a question (e.g., ‘Explain…’) tests AO1; the second part (e.g., ‘Discuss’, ‘Evaluate’, or ‘To what extent…’) tests AO2.

CIE AS Divinity 试卷通常要求你从六个问题中选择两到三题作答。每篇论文满分为25或30分。问题的第一部分（例如“解释……”）测试 AO1；第二部分（例如“讨论”“评价”或“在多大程度上……”）测试 AO2。

For example, a typical two-part question on the design argument may read:

例如，一道典型的两部分式目的论论证题目可能是：

‘Explain the design argument for the existence of God. [15] Discuss criticisms of this argument. [15]’

In Paper 2, you often get a source-based quote followed by two tasks: unpack the quote, then evaluate its claims.

在卷二当中，你常常会遇到一段引文，配有两个任务：解读引文，然后评价其主张。

4. Time Management Strategy | 时间管理策略

If you have 1 hour 30 minutes for three essays, allocate no more than 25 minutes per essay, leaving 5 minutes per essay for planning. A good structure is 45–50 minutes for writing and 5–10 minutes for checking.

如果你有1小时30分钟完成三篇论文，那么每篇最多分配25分钟，其中每篇留出5分钟用于规划。较好的安排是：45–50分钟写作，5–10分钟检查。

Within each essay, use the following time split:

在每篇论文内部，建议按以下时间分配：

2 minutes – plan and brainstorm key scholars, quotes, and criticisms.
2分钟 – 规划并头脑风暴关键学者、引文与批评观点。
8 minutes – write the introduction and the descriptive/explanatory section (AO1).
8分钟 – 撰写引言与描述/解释性部分（AO1）。
10 minutes – write the evaluation section (AO2) and conclusion.
10分钟 – 撰写评价部分（AO2）与结论。
2 minutes – reread and correct small errors.
2分钟 – 重读并修正小错误。

Never spend more than 30 minutes on one essay. If you run out of time, a brief conclusion capturing your strongest point is better than an unfinished paragraph.

切勿在一篇论文上花费超过30分钟。如果时间不够，一个简短但包含你最有力观点的结论，远胜于未完成的段落。

5. Structuring the Perfect Essay | 构建完美论文结构

An elite-level Divinity essay should follow a clear arc: introduction, exposition, evaluation, conclusion. Use signposting language to guide the examiner through your argument.

一篇高分 Divinity 论文应遵循清晰的脉络：引言、阐释、评价、结论。使用路标式语言引导考官理解你的论证。

In your introduction, briefly define key terms, state your thesis, and outline the debate. Do not rush into content without orientation.

在引言中，简要定义关键术语，陈述你的论点，并概述争论焦点。不要在没有定向的情况下仓促进入正文。

For the exposition (AO1), use the ‘PEEL’ method:

在阐释部分（AO1），使用“PEEL”方法：

Point: State the scholar’s view clearly.
Point（观点）：清晰陈述学者的观点。
Evidence: Provide a precise reference, such as a Bible verse or a philosopher’s specific example.
Evidence（证据）：提供精确引证，例如圣经经文或哲学家的具体例子。
Explanation: Show how the evidence supports the point logically.
Explanation（解释）：说明证据如何在逻辑上支持该观点。
Link: Connect back to the question and to your next paragraph.
Link（联系）：将本段与题目以及下一段衔接起来。

For evaluation (AO2), use the ‘AIDE’ approach:

对于评价部分（AO2），使用“AIDE”方法：

Acknowledge a counterargument or weakness.
Acknowledge（承认）：承认一个反论证或弱点。
Illustrate with an example or logical implication.
Illustrate（举例）：用例子或逻辑推论加以说明。
Defend your original position with a stronger rebuttal.
Defend（辩护）：用更有力的反驳来捍卫你的原始立场。
Evaluate the overall strength of each side, judging which is more persuasive.
Evaluate（评估）：整体评估双方的说服力，判断哪一方更强。

This rhythm prevents one-sided answers and demonstrates critical thinking, which is exactly what AO2 rewards.

这种节奏可以防止片面作答，展示批判性思维，而这正是 AO2 所奖励的能力。

6. Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them | 常见陷阱与规避方法

Many students lose marks due to preventable errors. Here are the most frequent pitfalls in CIE AS Divinity.

许多学生因为可避免的错误而丢分。以下是 CIE AS Divinity 中最常见的陷阱。

Pitfall 1 – Vague textual references: Writing ‘Jesus said’ without quoting or citing the chapter and verse. Always use precise references.
陷阱1 – 模糊的文本引用：只写“耶稣说”而不引用具体章节经文。务必使用精确引用。
Pitfall 2 – Description without evaluation: If the question asks ‘To what extent’, you must weigh both sides. Never end with a purely descriptive conclusion.
陷阱2 – 只有描述没有评价：如果题目问“在多大程度上”，你必须权衡双方。绝不要以纯描述的结论结尾。
Pitfall 3 – Ignoring scholars’ full names and contexts: ‘Aquinas said’ is too imprecise. Write ‘Thomas Aquinas in Summa Theologica argued…’ for higher AO1 marks.
陷阱3 – 忽视学者全名与语境：“阿奎那说”过于笼统。应写“托马斯·阿奎那在《神学大全》中主张……”以获得更高的 AO1 分数。
Pitfall 4 – Memorised essays that ignore the question: Examiners penalise irrelevant prepared content. Always adapt your material to the exact wording.
陷阱4 – 死记硬背而忽略题目：考官会惩罚与题目无关的背诵内容。务必根据题目的确切表述调整你的素材。
Pitfall 5 – No counter-evidence: A one-sided essay, no matter how eloquent, cannot score above a certain threshold. Include opposing views even if you disagree.
陷阱5 – 缺乏反证：无论文笔多么好，一篇片面的论文都无法突破一定分数上限。即使你不同意，也要纳入对立观点。

7. Past Paper Walkthrough: The Cosmological Argument | 真题解析：宇宙论论证

Let us work through a real CIE-style question to demonstrate the full method.

让我们用一道真实的 CIE 风格题来演示完整方法。

‘Explain the cosmological argument for the existence of God. [15] Assess whether the cosmological argument is successful in showing that God exists. [15]’

Step 1 – Plan (2 minutes): For AO1, structure the argument into two streams: the Kalam (William Lane Craig) and the Thomist (Aquinas’ First Way and Third Way). Include Aristotle’s prime mover. For AO2, critique with Hume’s objection to causality, Russell’s brute fact response, and the issue of infinite regress. Add a defence: the PSR (principle of sufficient reason) still supports contingency.

第一步 – 规划（2分钟）：对于 AO1，将论证分为两条脉络：凯拉姆（威廉·莱恩·克雷格）与托马斯主义（阿奎那第一路与第三路）。包括亚里士多德的第一推动者。对于 AO2，用休谟对因果性的反驳、罗素的“原始事实”回应以及无限回溯问题来批评。加入辩护：充足理由律（PSR）仍支持偶然性。

Step 2 – Write a concise AO1 paragraph (8 minutes):

第二步 – 撰写简洁的 AO1 段落（8分钟）：

The cosmological argument begins from the observation that the universe exists. In his Third Way, Thomas Aquinas argued that everything we observe is contingent – it could have been otherwise and depends on other causes. Since not everything can be contingent, there must exist a necessary being that causes but is not caused. This being is God. William Lane Craig’s Kalam argument formalises this: whatever begins to exist has a cause; the universe began to exist (as supported by Big Bang cosmology); therefore, the universe has a cause – God.

宇宙论论证从“宇宙存在”这一观察出发。在第三路中，托马斯·阿奎那指出，我们所观察的一切都是偶然的——它本可以不是这样，且依赖其他原因。既然并非所有事物都可以是偶然的，就必须存在一个必然的存在者，它引发一切却不受引发。这个存在者就是上帝。威廉·莱恩·克雷格的凯拉姆论证将其形式化：任何开始存在的事物都有原因；宇宙开始存在（大爆炸宇宙学支持这一点）；因此，宇宙有一个原因——上帝。

Step 3 – Write the evaluation section (10 minutes):

第三步 – 撰写评价部分（10分钟）：

However, David Hume argued that causation is not an ontological principle we can extend beyond experience. We observe things causing other things inside the universe, but we cannot assume the universe itself needs a cause. Bertrand Russell famously asked, ‘Why should the universe not be a brute fact?’ That is, the universe might simply exist without explanation. In response, proponents of the cosmological argument appeal to the principle of sufficient reason: every fact must have an explanation. But critics counter that the principle itself is an assumption, not a proven truth. On balance, the argument is logically structured, but whether it conclusively shows God exists depends on whether we accept a necessary being – a conclusion many find plausible yet not demonstrative.

然而，大卫·休谟认为，因果性不是我们可以超越经验延伸的本体论原则。我们观察到宇宙内部的事物相互引发，但我们不能假设宇宙本身需要一个原因。伯特兰·罗素曾著名地发问：“为何宇宙不能是一个原始事实？”也就是说，宇宙可能只是存在，无需解释。对此，宇宙论论证的支持者诉诸充足理由律：每一个事实都必须有解释。但批评者反驳说，该原则本身是一个假设，而非已被证明的真理。总体而言，该论证结构逻辑严谨，但它是否最终证明上帝存在，取决于我们是否接受必然存在者的概念——许多人认为该结论可行，但并非明证。

8. Past Paper Walkthrough: Natural Law and Abortion | 真题解析：自然律与堕胎

Another frequent exam area is applied ethics. Here is how to approach a question linking natural law to abortion.

另一个高频考试领域是应用伦理学。以下是如何处理一道将自然律与堕胎联系起来的问题。

‘Explain how a follower of Aquinas’ Natural Law would approach the issue of abortion. [15] Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this approach. [15]’

For AO1, you should outline the primary precepts (preserve innocent life, reproduce, worship God, live in society, educate children) and the secondary precepts derived from these. A natural law approach would argue abortion is always morally wrong because it violates the primary precept of preserving innocent life. The foetus is an innocent human from conception, and direct abortion as an intrinsic evil cannot be justified by a good intention.

对于 AO1，你应概述首要律令（保护无辜生命、繁衍后代、敬拜上帝、过社会生活、教育子女）以及由此推导出的次要律令。自然律方法会认为堕胎在道德上永远是错误的，因为它违反了保护无辜生命的首要律令。胎儿从受孕起就是无辜的人，而直接堕胎作为一种内在邪恶，不能因良好动机而被正当化。

For AO2, strengths include the clear, absolute moral principle that protects life consistently. Weaknesses include the lack of consensus on when personhood begins, conflicts between primary precepts (e.g., preserving the mother’s life), and Joseph Fletcher’s critique that inflexible rules ignore love and consequences. A strong conclusion might argue that while natural law provides a coherent framework, its absolutism fails in exceptional cases.

对于 AO2，优点包括清晰、绝对的道德原则，能够持续保护生命。缺点包括对人格从何时开始缺乏共识、主要律令之间的冲突（例如保护母亲生命），以及约瑟夫·弗莱彻的批评，即僵化的规则忽视了爱与后果。一个有力的结论可以论证：尽管自然律提供了连贯的框架，但其绝对主义在特殊情况下失效。

9. Memory Techniques for Key Quotes | 关键引文记忆技巧

Memorising exact quotes separates A-star candidates from average ones. For Bible quotes, group them by theme. For philosophers, use an acronym.

准确记忆引文是区分 A* 考生与普通考生的关键。对于圣经引文，按主题分组。对于哲学家，使用首字母缩略词。

For example, to remember key philosophers in the problem of evil, use ‘RAIL’ – for ‘R’ remember Rowe (the fawn suffering in the forest), ‘A’ for Augustine (free will theodicy), ‘I’ for Irenaeus (soul-making), ‘L’ for Leibniz (best of all possible worlds).

例如，要记住恶的问题中的关键哲学家，可以使用“RAIL”缩略词——“R”代表 Rowe（森林中小鹿的痛苦），“A”代表 Augustine（自由意志神义论），“I”代表 Irenaeus（灵魂塑造），“L”代表 Leibniz（所有可能世界中最好的世界）。

For Bible verses, use chapter-number patterns. For example, John 1:1 (‘In the beginning was the Word’) connects to Genesis 1:1 (‘In the beginning God created’). Linking verses by phrase or number helps retention.

对于圣经经文，使用章节数字模式。例如，约翰福音1:1（“太初有道”）与创世记1:1（“起初，上帝创造”）相联系。通过短语或数字来联系经文有助于记忆。

Create a quote bank with only the most versatile passages – perhaps 30 core quotes – and practise deploying them across different essay titles.

建立一个只包含最通用经文的引文库——大约30条核心引文——并练习在不同论文题目中运用它们。

10. The Mark Scheme Decoded | 解码评分标准

Understanding the mark scheme helps you target your writing accurately. In CIE Divinity, levels often run from 0 to 5 for AO1 and 0 to 5 for AO2.

理解评分标准有助于你精准定位写作方向。在 CIE Divinity 中，AO1 和 AO2 通常从0级到5级。

Level	AO1 Descriptor	AO2 Descriptor
1–2	Basic knowledge, limited details	Assertions with little reasoning
3–4	Good knowledge, some scholar references	Points supported with some evaluation
5	Precise, detailed, well-selected evidence	Consistent critical analysis, balanced conclusion

To reach the top level, use scholarly terminology, present multiple viewpoints, and ensure your conclusion directly answers the exact wording of the question.

要达到最高等级，需要使用学术术语、呈现多重观点，并确保你的结论直接回应题目的确切措辞。

11. Revision Timetable for the Final Month | 最后一个月复习时间表

In the four weeks before the exam, use a rotating schedule that balances content review and timed practice.

在考前四周，使用轮换式计划，平衡内容复习与限时练习。

Week 1: Re-read your class notes for Paper 2 topics and create one-page summaries for each philosopher.
第1周：重读卷二课堂笔记，为每位哲学家制作一页纸摘要。
Week 2: Re-read all biblical set texts. Create a timeline of key events and teachings.
第2周：重读所有圣经指定文本。制作关键事件与教导的时间线。
Week 3: Do six full essays under exam conditions. Mark them using the official mark scheme.
第3周：在考试条件下完成六篇完整论文。使用官方评分标准自评。
Week 4: Review your marked essays, memorise your quote bank, and practise essay plans for every past paper question.
第4周：复习已批改的论文，记忆引文库，并为每一道真题练习论文提纲。

Never passively reread without writing. Active recall is the single most effective revision strategy.

切勿只被动重读而不动笔。主动回忆是唯一最有效的复习策略。

12. Final Tips for Exam Day | 考试日的最终建议

On the day of the exam, start by skimming all questions. Select the ones where you can give the most precise textual references and strongest evaluations. Write a brief plan for each essay before beginning.

考试当天，先快速浏览所有题目。选择你能提供最精确文本引用和最强评价的题目。开始作答前，为每篇论文撰写简短提纲。

Keep an eye on the clock. If you have 30 minutes remaining and two essays left, do not panic – write a shorter but still structured essay. An excellent short essay beats a long, rambling one.

注意时间。如果还剩30分钟但还有两篇论文未完成，不要惊慌——写一篇较短但结构完整的论文。一篇精彩而简短的论文胜过长而杂乱的文章。

Finally, remember that Divinity is not about memorising a single ‘correct’ answer. Examiners reward nuance, balance, and respect for differing viewpoints. Show that you can think like a philosopher and a theologian simultaneously.

最后，请记住 Divinity 不是关于记忆一个“正确答案”。考官奖励细致、平衡以及对不同观点的尊重。展示你能同时像哲学家和神学家一样思考。

Published by TutorHao | Religion Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）

CIE AS Religious Studies: Divinity Exam Strategy & Past Paper Analysis | CIE AS 宗教：Divinity 备考攻略与真题解析