How GCSE and A-Level Grades Are Awarded on Evidence of Student Performance When Exams Are Disrupted | 考试中断时 GCSE 与 A-Level 如何凭学生表现证据评分

📚 How GCSE and A-Level Grades Are Awarded on Evidence of Student Performance When Exams Are Disrupted | 考试中断时 GCSE 与 A-Level 如何凭学生表现证据评分

When a national exam series cannot be delivered fairly – because of school closures, a pandemic, severe weather, a cyber-attack on an awarding organisation, or disruption affecting a single candidate – England does not simply abandon the qualification. Instead, grades are reconstructed from other evidence of what the student has actually done. That evidence comes from mocks, past papers, non-exam assessment, topic tests, supervised assessments and portfolios of work, judged by teachers against national standards and then quality assured, and in some years statistically adjusted, by the exam boards and Ofqual.

当全国性考试无法公平举行时——无论是停课、疫情、极端天气、考试局遭受网络攻击，还是个别考生遭遇突发状况——英格兰并不会直接放弃这项资格证书，而是依据学生”实际做过什么”的其他证据来重建成绩。这些证据来自模拟考、历年真题、非考试评估、单元测验、监考条件下的测验以及作品集，由教师参照全国统一标准作出判断，再由考试局与 Ofqual 进行质量保证，某些年份还会进行统计调整。

1. What Assessment Disruption Actually Means | 考试中断到底意味着什么

Disruption operates on two very different scales. Mass disruption affects whole cohorts: schools closed from March to July 2020 and again in the spring term of 2021 in England, so summer exams could not be sat at all. Individual disruption affects one candidate: illness on the day, a bereavement, a long hospital stay, an accident, or a clash with a religious festival. Both are handled under published rules, but the machinery is completely different.

中断发生在两个完全不同的层级。大规模中断影响整届学生：2020 年 3 月至 7 月英格兰学校关闭，2021 年春季学期再次停课，夏季考试根本无法举行。个别中断只影响一名考生：考试当天生病、亲人离世、长期住院、意外事故，或与宗教节日冲突。两者都按公开规则处理，但所用机制完全不同。

For individual cases, JCQ regulations allow special consideration. If a candidate sat the assessment but was affected by a temporary illness, injury or other event, a small uplift may be applied – generally limited to a maximum of 5% of the marks available. If a component was missed for an acceptable reason, a centre can apply for a derived or calculated mark instead.

对于个别情况，JCQ 规定允许”特殊考虑”（special consideration）。如果考生已参加考试但受临时疾病、受伤或其他事件影响，可获得小幅加分，通常上限为该项总分的 5%。如果因可接受的原因缺考某个单元，中心可申请推算分（derived mark）。

2. Three Grading Models Used in England | 英格兰用过的三种评分模式

Since 2020, England has relied on three broad models. The first is teacher judgement with statistical standardisation, used for centre assessment grades (CAGs) in 2020. The second is teacher judgement with no algorithm but strong quality assurance, used for teacher assessed grades (TAGs) in 2021. The third, from 2022 onwards, is a normal exam series with adaptations and a published contingency plan.

自 2020 年以来，英格兰主要采用三种模式：第一种是”教师判断 + 统计标准化”，即 2020 年的中心评估成绩（CAG）；第二种是”教师判断 + 无算法但强质量保证”，即 2021 年的教师评估成绩（TAG）；第三种从 2022 年起，是在调整措施与公开应急方案支撑下的正常考试。

The key insight for students is that the qualification standard never disappeared. Teachers were not asked to invent grades; they were asked to produce a judgement that could withstand external scrutiny, using evidence generated under conditions as close to real exams as possible.

对学生而言，关键点是：资格标准从未消失。教师不是被要求”凭空给分”，而是被要求给出一个能经受外部审查的判断，其依据是尽可能接近真实考试条件下产生的证据。

3. What Counts as Evidence of Student Performance | 什么算作”学生表现证据”

Not everything a student produces counts as evidence. Exam board guidance in 2021 set out clear conditions, and the same principles sit behind the contingency frameworks used since 2022. Evidence must be the student’s own work, produced under conditions that allow authentication, marked against the specification’s standards, and capable of being justified to an external examiner.

并非学生产出的所有东西都算”证据”。考试局 2021 年的指引提出了明确条件，2022 年以来应急框架背后的原则也完全一致：证据必须是学生本人的作品；产生条件应能核实其真实性；须依据大纲标准评分；并能向外部考官给出合理说明。

• Timed past papers and mock exams – the closest proxy to the real thing, especially when sat under full exam conditions and marked with the official mark scheme.
  限时历年真题与模拟考——最接近真实考试的替代品，尤其是在完整考试条件下完成并使用官方评分方案批改时。
• Non-exam assessment (NEA) and coursework – already teacher-assessed and externally moderated, so usually the most robust evidence available.
  非考试评估（NEA）与课程作业——本就由教师评分、外部审核，通常是可靠性最高的证据。
• Supervised in-class assessments and end-of-topic tests – useful for coverage of content taught later in the course.
  监考下的随堂测验与单元测试——用于覆盖课程后期才教授的内容。
• Practical work, performances and recordings – laboratory notebooks, music recitals, drama performances, spoken language assessments.
  实验、表演与录音录像——实验记录本、音乐演奏、戏剧表演、口语测试。
• Fieldwork reports and projects – geography fieldwork, EPQ, and other centre-assessed components.
  实地调查报告与项目——地理野外调查、EPQ 及其他由中心评估的部分。

Crucially, evidence had to be about demonstrated performance, not about potential, effort, attendance or predicted grades. A student who could show they could reach a grade deserved it; a student who “might” reach it could not be credited for it.

关键在于，证据必须体现”已展示的表现”，而不是潜力、努力程度、出勤率或预测成绩。能证明自己达到某一等级的学生应当得到

Published by TutorHao | Exam Prep Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）