Year 10 Cambridge Geography: Case Study Practical Exercises | 剑桥10年级地理：案例分析实战演练

📚 Year 10 Cambridge Geography: Case Study Practical Exercises | 剑桥10年级地理：案例分析实战演练

Case studies are the backbone of Cambridge IGCSE Geography. They turn abstract concepts into real-world evidence and can make or break your 7‑mark answers. This practical guide will walk you through how to select, structure, and write about case studies so that you feel confident in the exam hall.

案例分析是剑桥IGCSE地理的支柱。它们将抽象概念转化为真实世界的证据，能够决定你在7分题上的成败。这份实用指南将带你一步步掌握如何选择、组织和撰写案例分析，让你在考场上充满信心。

1. Why Case Studies Matter in IGCSE Geography | 为什么案例分析对IGCSE地理至关重要

In IGCSE Geography, at least half of the marks on Paper 1 and Paper 2 come from questions that require specific, place‑based examples. You cannot rely on textbook theory alone; the syllabus expects you to know named locations with precise facts and figures.

在IGCSE地理中，试卷一和试卷二至少有一半的分数来自需要具体地点示例的题目。你不能只依赖教科书理论；大纲要求你掌握带有准确事实和数据的具体地点。

Case studies demonstrate your ability to apply knowledge to real situations. An answer that says “flooding in an LEDC” without naming a country is unlikely to score highly. A detailed example of Bangladesh, with dates and statistics, shows the examiner you truly understand the topic.

案例分析能展示你将知识应用于真实情境的能力。如果仅说“在一个欠发达国家的洪水”，而不提国名，不太可能获得高分。一个包含日期和统计数据的孟加拉国详细示例，则向考官表明你真正理解了该主题。

2. Key Components of a Strong Case Study Answer | 高质量案例分析答案的关键要素

Every high‑scoring case study paragraph contains four essential layers. You should always name the specific place, describe the situation with precise data, explain how it links to geographical concepts, and, where relevant, evaluate the success of any management.

每个高分案例分析段落都包含四个基本层次。你永远应该先说出具体地点，用精确数据描述情况，解释其与地理概念的联系，并在必要时评估管理措施的成功程度。

For example, when discussing a pro‑natalist policy, do not just mention “France.” Instead, identify Singapore, state that the government offers a Baby Bonus cash gift of up to SGD 13,000, and link this to the ageing population and low fertility rate of 1.0 in 2021. Then comment on whether the policy really raised the birth rate.

例如，在讨论鼓励生育的政策时，不要只提“法国”。而要明确指出新加坡，说明政府提供最高可达13,000新加坡元的婴儿花红现金奖励，并将此与人口老龄化以及2021年1.0的低生育率联系起来。然后再评论该政策是否真的提高了出生率。

Layer 层次	What to include 需要包含的内容
Place 地点	Named country, region or city with continent 指定国家、地区或城市及所在大洲
Data 数据	Figures, dates, rates, distances, heights 数字、日期、比率、距离、高度
Explanation 解释	Links to causes, effects or processes 与原因、影响或过程的联系
Evaluation 评估	Successes, failures, sustainability 成功、失败、可持续性

3. Step‑by‑Step: Analysing a Population Policy – China’s One‑Child Policy | 逐步分析：人口政策案例 – 中国独生子女政策

China introduced the One‑Child Policy in 1979 to combat rapid population growth that was straining resources. The government feared famine and unemployment if the population continued to soar.

中国于1979年引入独生子女政策，以应对因人口快速增长导致的资源紧张。政府担心如果人口继续飙升，将引发饥荒和失业。

Families in urban areas were restricted to one child, while in some rural areas a second child was allowed if the first was a girl. Incentives included free healthcare and education, while penalties involved fines and job loss. By 2015, the policy had prevented an estimated 400 million births.

城市家庭被限制只生一个孩子，而一些农村地区如果第一胎是女孩可允许生二胎。奖励措施包括免费医疗和教育，惩罚则包括罚款和失业。到2015年，该政策估计少生了4亿人。

The demographic consequence was a rapidly ageing society. The fertility rate dropped to around 1.5, well below replacement level, and by 2050 over a quarter of China’s population is expected to be over 65. This forced the government to relax the policy, first to a two‑child policy in 2016 and then to a three‑child policy in 2021.

人口结构上的后果是社会迅速老龄化。生育率降至1.5左右，远低于更替水平，预计到2050年超过四分之一的中国人口将超过65岁。这迫使政府放松政策，先是在2016年实施全面二孩政策，然后2021年允许三孩。

Evaluating its effectiveness is nuanced: while the crude birth rate fell sharply, critics point to human rights concerns, the rise in abandoned baby girls, and a shrinking workforce that now threatens economic growth.

评估其效果需要细致入微：虽然粗出生率大幅下降，但批评者指出了人权问题、女婴被遗弃增加以及现在威胁经济增长的劳动力萎缩。

4. Tackling an Urban Settlement Case: Rio de Janeiro’s Favelas | 处理城市定居点案例：里约热内卢的贫民窟

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, is a classic case study for urban challenges in an emerging country. About 22% of Rio’s population – roughly 1.5 million people – live in favelas, which are informal settlements built on steep hillsides close to the city centre.

巴西里约热内卢是新兴国家城市挑战的一个经典案例。约22%的里约人口——大约150万人——居住在贫民窟中，这些是建在城市中心附近陡峭山坡上的非正规定居点。

These areas face multiple problems: poor sanitation, open sewers, and collapsing homes during heavy rain. Landslides occur regularly because trees have been cleared, leaving soil unstable. Crime and drug trafficking are high due to the lack of a formal police presence.

这些地区面临多重问题：卫生条件差、明沟排污、暴雨时房屋倒塌。由于树木被砍伐导致土壤不稳定，滑坡经常发生。由于缺少正规警力，犯罪和毒品走私猖獗。

A key example of management is the Favela‑Bairro project, started in the 1990s, which aimed to integrate favelas into the formal city by providing paved roads, drainage, and public services. In the Complexo do Alemao, a cable car system was installed to improve mobility, and a ‘pacification police’ unit was brought in to reduce gang control.

管理方面的一个关键例子是1990年代启动的贫民窟改造项目（Favela‑Bairro），旨在通过提供铺装道路、排水系统和公共服务，将贫民窟融入正式城市。在阿莱芒贫民窟群，安装了缆车系统以改善出行，并引入“平定警察”部队以减少帮派控制。

Despite these efforts, the 2016 Olympics highlighted the contrast: pacification initially lowered crime, but violence returned soon after the police left many areas. The self‑help schemes, where residents are given materials to improve their own houses, have been more sustainable but much slower.

尽管做出了这些努力，2016年奥运会还是凸显了反差：平定行动最初降低了犯罪率，但警察撤离许多地区后暴力很快卷土重来。居民获得材料自行改善住房的自助计划更具可持续性，但进展非常缓慢。

5. Natural Hazards in Action: The 2010 Haiti Earthquake | 自然灾害实战：2010年海地地震

On 12 January 2010, a magnitude 7.0 earthquake struck Haiti, a small Caribbean island country on the North American Plate boundary. The epicentre was only 25 km west of the capital, Port‑au‑Prince, causing catastrophic damage.

2010年1月12日，一场7.0级地震袭击了海地——一个位于北美板块边界上的加勒比海岛国。震中距离首都太子港仅25公里，造成了灾难性的破坏。

Over 220,000 people were killed, 300,000 were injured, and 1.5 million were left homeless. The primary effects were worsened by Haiti’s low level of development: 86% of the population lived in poverty, buildings were poorly constructed without reinforced concrete, and the country had no seismic monitoring network.

超过22万人死亡，30万人受伤，150万人无家可归。海地的低发展水平加剧了主要影响：86%的人口生活在贫困中，建筑缺乏钢筋混凝土、质量低劣，且该国没有地震监测网络。

Secondary effects included a cholera outbreak in October 2010, spread by contaminated water in densely packed camps. Relief was hampered by a damaged port, blocked roads, and the collapse of government buildings. The United Nations and Red Cross launched massive aid efforts, but a lot of money was lost through poor coordination and corruption.

次生影响包括2010年10月爆发的霍乱，由密集营地中被污染的水源传播。受损的港口、堵塞的道路以及政府大楼的倒塌阻碍了救援。联合国和红十字会发起了大规模援助行动，但因协调不善和腐败导致大量资金流失。

Today, many lessons have been learned about building earthquake‑resistant structures in low‑income countries, but Haiti remains highly vulnerable to future seismic events.

如今，在低收入国家建造抗震建筑方面吸取了许多教训，但海地依然极易受到未来地震事件的影响。

6. Coastal Management Showdown: The Holderness Coast | 海岸管理案例：霍尔德内斯海岸

The Holderness Coast in East Yorkshire, UK, is one of Europe’s fastest eroding coastlines, retreating on average 2 metres per year. The soft boulder clay cliffs are easily worn away by waves from the North Sea.

英国东约克郡的霍尔德内斯海岸是欧洲侵蚀速度最快的海岸线之一，平均每年后退2米。松软的冰砾泥悬崖容易被北海海浪侵蚀。

At Mappleton, a village at risk of falling into the sea, hard engineering was installed in 1991: two rock groynes and a rock revetment that cost £2 million. The groynes trapped sand and widened the beach, successfully protecting the village.

在面临坠入大海风险的梅普尔顿村，1991年安装了硬工程：两个岩块丁坝和一座岩块护岸，耗资200万英镑。丁坝截留了沙粒并拓宽了海滩，成功地保护了村庄。

However, this intervention caused terminal groyne syndrome further south, where sediment starvation led to even faster erosion down‑drift. Places like Great Cowden farm lost several metres of land a year, sparking furious debate about whether to defend or retreat.

然而，这项干预在更南的海岸造成了终端丁坝综合症，泥沙缺乏导致沿岸下方侵蚀更快。像大考登农场这样的地方一年损失数米土地，引发了关于设防还是后撤的激烈辩论。

Managed retreat is now the preferred strategy for many stretches, allowing the sea to claim low‑value farmland while creating new wetland habitats. This case shows the complex trade‑offs in coastal management.

如今，许多岸段更倾向于受控后退策略，允许海水淹没低价值农田，同时创造新的湿地栖息地。这个案例展示了海岸管理中复杂的权衡取舍。

7. River Flooding: Bangladesh’s Perennial Challenge | 河流洪水：孟加拉国的长期挑战

Bangladesh, located on the floodplains of the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna rivers, is one of the world’s most flood‑prone countries. Around 80% of the country is less than 10 metres above sea level, and monsoon rains combine with Himalayan snowmelt to cause annual flooding.

孟加拉国地处恒河、布拉马普特拉河和梅格纳河的泛滥平原上，是世界上最易受洪水侵袭的国家之一。约80%的国土海拔不足10米，季风降雨加上喜马拉雅山雪融水导致每年都会发生洪水。

In 2007, severe floods covered 40% of the country, killing over 1000 people, destroying 1.2 million homes, and leaving millions without clean water. The physical causes are clear: flat topography, intense monsoon rain (up to 500 mm in a few days), and tectonic uplift in the Himalayas increasing sediment load.

2007年，严重洪水淹没了40%的国土，造成1000多人死亡，摧毁了120万所房屋，数百万人无法获得洁净水。自然原因很明显：地势平坦，季风暴雨（几天内可达500毫米），以及喜马拉雅山的构造抬升增加了河流的泥沙负荷。

Human factors worsen the risk. Deforestation in Nepal and India increases runoff, and rapid urbanisation in Dhaka blocks natural drainage. Yet, people continue to live on these floodplains because the annual silt renewal makes the soil incredibly fertile for rice cultivation.

人为因素加剧了风险。尼泊尔和印度的森林砍伐增加了径流量，达卡的快速城市化堵塞了自然排水系统。然而，人们依然在这些泛滥平原上生活，因为每年的淤泥更新使土壤极为肥沃，有利于水稻种植。

Management now focuses on forecasting, early warning systems, and community‑based shelters. Embankments have been built, but they often fail because they choke off natural sediment deposition and can be breached.

如今的管理侧重于预报、预警系统和社区避难所。虽然修建了堤坝，但它们经常失效，因为堤坝阻碍了自然泥沙沉积，并可能发生溃堤。

8. Using the ‘PEEL’ Framework for Geographical Analysis | 使用’PEEL’框架进行地理分析

To structure a case study answer, apply the PEEL method: Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link. Start with a clear point that addresses the question, immediately back it with specific evidence from your case, explain the geographical processes involved, and link back to the question or the next idea.

要组织案例分析答案，请使用PEEL方法：观点、证据、解释、联系。以一个明确的观点开头回应题目，立即用你案例中的具体证据支持，解释所涉及的地理过程，并回扣题目或联系下一个想法。

For instance, a question on urban sprawl: “Rio’s favelas have expanded because of rural‑urban migration (Point). The city gained 1.1 million migrants between 1990 and 2010 (Evidence) due to mechanisation in agriculture that pushed people out of the countryside and the perception of better jobs in the city (Explanation). This migration directly contributed to the growth of informal settlements on marginal land (Link).”

例如，关于城市扩张的题目：“里约的贫民窟因城乡移民而扩大（观点）。由于农业机械化将人们推离农村，加上城市里有更好工作的预期，1990年至2010年间该市增加了110万移民（证据），这直接导致了边缘地带非正规定居点的增长（联系）。”

Practicing PEEL paragraphing with every case study you learn guarantees that your answers will always have the detail examiners expect.

对每个你学习的案例都练习PEEL段落法，就能确保你的答案始终包含考官所期望的细节。

9. Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them | 常见陷阱及应对策略

One frequent mistake is name‑dropping a case study without explaining it. Writing “The Three Gorges Dam in China provides renewable energy” scores nothing because it lacks data and geographical explanation. Instead, state that the dam generates 22.5 GW of hydroelectricity, displacing 1.3 million people, and then discuss the environmental and social impacts.

一个常见错误是仅仅提到案例名称而不加解释。写“中国的三峡大坝提供可再生能源”不能得分，因为缺乏数据和地理解释。应该说明大坝发电量为225亿瓦，导致了130万人搬迁，然后讨论环境和社会影响。

Another trap is mixing up locations. You must know which continent your case study belongs to, because a question might specify an LEDC in Asia or a coastal management scheme in an MEDC. Use revision tools like flashcards to match cases to themes and continents.

另一个陷阱是混淆地点。你必须知道你的案例属于哪个大洲，因为题目可能会指定一个亚洲的欠发达国家或一个发达国家的海岸管理方案。使用抽认卡等复习工具将案例与主题和大陆对应起来。

Finally, avoid memorising only one example per theme. The syllabus requires you to be able to compare. Always have at least two contrasting case studies ready, such as one LEDC and one MEDC for earthquake response, so you can answer compare‑style questions.

最后，避免每个主题只记一个例子。大纲要求你能够进行比较。始终至少准备两个相反的案例，例如地震应对各准备一个欠发达国家和发达国家的例子，这样你就能回答比较类问题。

10. Applying Your Skills: A Practice Exam Question | 技能应用：一个考试题目实战

Here is a typical 7‑mark question: “For a named country you have studied, explain how the government is trying to manage rapid population growth. Assess the success of these strategies.”

这是一个典型的7分题目：“选取你学习过的一个指定国家，解释政府如何努力管理人口的快速增长。评估这些策略的成功程度。”

Let us model an answer using Bangladesh. Start with the context: Bangladesh has a population of over 170 million and a high growth rate that puts pressure on resources. The government introduced a family planning programme in the 1970s, with female health workers visiting villages to provide contraception and education. The total fertility rate has fallen from 6.3 in 1975 to 2.3 in 2022.

我们以孟加拉国为例回答。从背景开始：孟加拉国人口超过1.7亿，高增长率给资源带来压力。政府于1970年代推行了计划生育项目，女性卫生工作者走访村庄提供避孕措施和教育。总和生育率从1975年的6.3降至2022年的2.3。

Explain that the success is partial. While the birth rate dropped, infant mortality remains high at 30 per 1000 live births, and early marriage still fuels population momentum. The government has struggled to provide enough jobs for its large youth cohort, leading to migration. Thus, the strategy has been effective in lowering fertility but has not solved wider poverty and employment issues.

解释其成功是有限的。虽然出生率下降了，但婴儿死亡率仍然高达每千例活产30人，早婚继续推动人口惯性增长。政府一直难以为其庞大的青年群体提供足够的工作，导致移民。因此，该策略在降低生育率方面是有效的，但并未解决更广泛的贫困和就业问题。

This answer uses specific data, explains processes, and ends with a balanced evaluation, exactly the approach that earns top marks.

这个答案使用了具体数据，解释了过程，并以均衡的评估结尾，正是拿到高分的方法。

11. Comparing Case Studies for Synoptic Questions | 比较案例分析以应对综合题

Paper 2 often asks you to compare the impacts of a hazard in an LEDC and an MEDC. The key is to move beyond “LEDCs suffer more deaths” and explain why using development indicators such as GDP per capita, building codes, and governance quality.

试卷二经常要求你比较灾害在欠发达国家和发达国家的影响。关键是要超越“欠发达国家死亡人数更多”的笼统说法，运用人均GDP、建筑规范和治理质量等发展指标来解释原因。

For earthquakes, compare the 2010 Haiti earthquake (LEDC) with the 2011 Christchurch earthquake in New Zealand (MEDC). Christchurch had a magnitude of 6.3 and caused 185 deaths, while Haiti’s 7.0 magnitude killed over 220,000. The difference lies not in magnitude but in resilience: strict building regulations in New Zealand, rapid emergency services, and a wealthier population that could afford insurance and repairs.

以地震为例，比较2010年海地地震（欠发达国家）和2011年新西兰基督城地震（发达国家）。基督城震级6.3级，造成185人死亡，而海地7.0级地震却造成超过22万人死亡。差异不在于震级，而在于抗灾韧性：新西兰严格的建筑法规、快速的应急服务以及更富裕的人口能够承担保险和维修费用。

Always frame your comparison around a clear concept such as vulnerability, resilience, or risk perception. This demonstrates high‑order geographical thinking.

始终围绕一个明确的概念来构建你的比较，比如脆弱性、韧性或风险感知。这展示了高层次的地理学思维。

12. Your Case Study Revision Checklist | 案例分析复习清单

Use the checklist below to ensure every case study in your notes is exam‑ready. Tick each box once you can confidently recall the information from memory.

使用下面的清单确保你笔记中的每个案例分析都为考试做好了准备。当你能够自信地凭记忆回忆起信息时，就在每个框里打勾。

Named location with map reference (continent and region) 明确的地点及地图参考（大洲和地区）
Date of event or time period of policy 事件日期或政策实行的时间段
At least three specific statistics (population, magnitude, rate, distance) 至少三个具体统计数据（人口、震级、比率、距离）
Causes of the issue (physical and human) 问题的原因（自然和人文）
Effects or impacts (short‑term and long‑term) 后果或影响（短期和长期）
Management responses and their evaluation 管理应对措施及其评价
Comparison ready: a contrasting example from a different country level of development 准备对比：一个来自不同发展水平国家的对比案例

Once you have all these layers for at least one case study per major theme – population, settlement, plate tectonics, rivers, coasts, weather, and economic development – you will walk into the exam equipped to tackle any question.

一旦你为每个主要主题——人口、定居点、板块构造、河流、海岸、天气和经济发展——至少准备了一个具备所有这些层次的案例，你将能够从容应对考场上的任何问题。

Published by TutorHao | Geography Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）

Year 10 Cambridge Geography: Case Study Practical Exercises | 剑桥10年级地理：案例分析实战演练