📚 OCR Philosophy Year 11: Key Terms Memory Guide | 哲学关键术语速记指南
Mastering philosophical terminology is not just about memorising definitions — it is about unlocking the tools to think clearly, argue effectively, and score top marks in your OCR exam. This guide breaks down the most important key terms across the syllabus, pairing each with a memorable trick or mnemonic to embed it deeply in your mind. Whether you are wrestling with a posteriori arguments or trying to recall the difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism, these bite-sized explanations and memory aids will transform revision from a chore into a confident, exam-ready skill.
掌握哲学术语不仅仅是背诵定义——它是帮助你清晰思考、有效论证并在OCR考试中取得高分的关键工具。本指南将考纲中最核心的术语逐一分解，每一个都配有易记的记忆窍门或助记法，让知识牢牢扎根在你的脑海中。无论你正在苦战「后天论证」，还是努力区分「行为功利主义」与「规则功利主义」，这些精炼的解释和记忆辅助都将把复习从一项苦差事转化为自信应对考试的必备能力。
1. Metaphysics: Reality and Existence | 形而上学：实在与存在
A priori — knowledge gained independently of sense experience, often through reason alone (e.g. ‘All bachelors are unmarried’). Think of the ‘A’ in a priori as standing for ‘Abstract’ reasoning, where you do not need to step outside your mind to know something.
先天 —— 不依赖于感官经验而获得的知识，通常仅凭理性（例如「所有单身汉都是未婚的」）。把「先天」的「先」想象成「先在脑中」，也就是你不需要走出自己的大脑就能知道的事情。
A posteriori — knowledge that depends on empirical evidence or sense experience (e.g. ‘The cat is on the mat’). Link ‘post’ in a posteriori to ‘after’ experience — you need to look at the world first.
后天 —— 依赖于经验证据或感官经验的知识（例如「猫在垫子上」）。将「后天」的「后」与「经验之后」联系起来——你需要先观察世界才能知道。
Substance dualism — the view that mind and body are two fundamentally distinct kinds of substance (mental and physical), as defended by Descartes. Picture two ‘submarines’ (sub-stances) that never merge: one invisible mind‑sub, one visible body‑sub.
实体二元论 —— 认为心灵与身体是两种根本不同的实体（精神实体和物质实体），由笛卡尔为其辩护。想象两艘永不融合的「潜艇」（实体）：一艘是看不见的心灵潜艇，一艘是看得见的身体潜艇。
Determinism — the thesis that every event, including human choices, is causally necessitated by prior states and natural laws. See a long ‘determined’ chain of dominoes; once the first one tips, every subsequent fall is fixed.
决定论 —— 认为一切事件（包括人类选择）都是由先前的状态和自然法则因果必然地决定的。想象一排已经「被决定了」的多米诺骨牌；一旦推倒第一块，所有的后续倒下都已注定。
2. Epistemology: Knowledge and Belief | 认识论：知识与信念
Justified true belief (JTB) — the traditional tripartite definition of knowledge: a belief must be true and supported by adequate justification. Think of JTB as a three‑legged stool; remove any leg (truth, justification, belief) and the stool collapses.
得到辩护的真信念（JTB） —— 传统的知识三元定义：一个信念必须是真的，并且有充分的辩护。把 JTB 想象成一张三脚凳；抽掉任何一条腿（真、辩护、信念），凳子就会倒塌。
Gettier cases — scenarios where someone has a justified true belief but still seems to lack knowledge, challenging the JTB account. Picture a broken clock that happens to show the right time; your belief is justified and true, yet you do not really ‘know’ the time.
盖梯尔案例 —— 某人有辩护的真信念却似乎仍缺乏知识的情景，对 JTB 理论构成挑战。想象一面出故障的钟刚好显示了正确的时间；你的信念有辩护且为真，但你并没有真正「知道」时间。
Rationalism — the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge, rather than sense experience. Remember ‘ratio’ as the Latin root for ‘reason’; rationalists trust the mind’s own reasoning ratio.
理性主义 —— 认为理性（而非感官经验）是知识首要来源的认识论立场。记住「ratio」是拉丁语中「理性」的词根；理性主义者信赖心灵自身的推理比率。
Empiricism — the view that all knowledge ultimately comes from sense experience. Connect ’empirical’ to ’em‑PIRI‑cal’ — like a pirate who must see the treasure map (senses) before claiming knowledge.
经验主义 —— 认为一切知识最终都来源于感官经验。将「经验」的「验」联想为「眼见为实」——就像必须亲眼看见藏宝图才能声称拥有知识。
3. Ethics: Moral Philosophy | 伦理学：道德哲学
Utilitarianism — the ethical theory that the right action is the one that maximises overall happiness or utility. Picture a huge ‘utility’ power meter; the action that makes the needle swing furthest towards ‘happiness’ is the right one.
功利主义 —— 认为正当的行为就是能带来最大整体幸福或功用的伦理理论。想象一个巨大的「功用」电表；让指针最偏向「幸福」一端的行为就是对的。
Act utilitarianism — judges each individual action by its consequences. Think of an ‘act’or on stage: every single act is evaluated for the applause (happiness) it generates.
行为功利主义 —— 以结果来评判每一个具体行为。想象舞台上的一名「演员」（act-or）：他的每一个表演动作都根据博得的掌声（幸福）来评判。
Rule utilitarianism — judges actions by whether they conform to rules that, if generally followed, would maximise happiness. A ‘ruler’ sets rules; by following the ruler’s straight edge, society draws the line towards maximal happiness.
规则功利主义 —— 根据行为是否遵循某些规则来评判，而这些规则如果被普遍遵守，会带来最大幸福。一把「尺子」（ruler）设定规则；沿着尺子的直边画线，社会就能走向最大幸福。
Kantian ethics — the deontological theory that morality is grounded in duty and the categorical imperative: act only on maxims you can will as universal laws. Envisage a giant ‘Kant’ stamp that marks an action as ‘Universalizable? Yes/No’; if no, it is forbidden.
康德伦理学 —— 一种义务论，主张道德根植于责任和定言命令：只按照你能够同时意愿它成为普遍法则的准则去行动。想象一枚巨大的「康德」印章，在行为上盖下「可否普遍化？是/否」；若否，则被禁止。
4. Philosophy of Mind: Consciousness and Identity | 心灵哲学：意识与同一性
Qualia — the subjective, ‘what‑it‑is‑like’ character of conscious experience (e.g. the redness of red). Think of ‘qualia’ as the ‘quality‑uh’ of an experience — the personal, first‑person feel that no scientist can measure.
感受质 —— 意识经验中主观的「像什么样」的特征（例如看到红色的那个「红」）。把「感受质」想象成一种经验的「质感」——那种私人的、第一人称的感受，任何科学家都无法测量。
Physicalism — the view that everything, including the mind, is ultimately physical or supervenes on the physical. Picture the whole world made of LEGO® bricks: even thoughts are just complex arrangements of physical bricks.
物理主义 —— 认为一切事物（包括心灵）最终都是物理的，或者随附于物理事物。想象整个世界由乐高积木构成：哪怕是思想，也只是物理积木的复杂排列。
Functionalism — the theory that mental states are defined by their causal roles — their inputs, outputs, and relations to other mental states. Like a coffee machine: it does not matter what material it is made of, as long as it performs the function of making coffee.
功能主义 —— 主张心理状态由其因果角色（输入、输出以及与其他心理状态的关系）来定义的理论。就像一台咖啡机：它由什么材料制成并不重要，只要它能完成制作咖啡的功能即可。
The hard problem of consciousness — coined by David Chalmers, it asks why and how physical processes give rise to subjective experience. Distinguish ‘hard’ (why it feels like something) from ‘easy’ problems (explaining brain functions). Think of it as the hardest puzzle in the universe — why is there an inner movie at all?
意识的困难问题 —— 由大卫·查尔默斯提出，追问物理过程为何以及如何产生主观体验。区分「困难」问题（为什么会有感觉）与「容易」问题（解释大脑功能）。把它想象成宇宙中最难的谜题——为什么会有内在的电影？
5. Philosophy of Religion: God and Faith | 宗教哲学：上帝与信仰
Ontological argument — an a priori argument for God’s existence, claiming that God’s essence implies existence (Anselm: ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’ must exist in reality). The ‘O’ in ontological hints at ‘On paper’ — you need no experience, just the concept of God.
本体论论证 —— 一种关于上帝存在的先天论证，声称上帝的本质蕴含着存在（安瑟伦：「不能设想有比之更伟大者」必定存在于现实中）。本体论中的「本」提示你「本就」如此——它不需要经验，只需上帝的概念。
Cosmological argument — an a posteriori argument that moves from the existence of the cosmos to a first cause or necessary being. ‘Cosmos’ means universe; the argument starts with the cosmos and reasons back to its cause.
宇宙论论证 —— 一种后天论证，从宇宙的存在推出第一因或必然存在者。「宇宙」即世界；这个论证从宇宙出发，回溯其因。
Teleological (design) argument — infers an intelligent designer from apparent purpose and order in nature. ‘Teleo‑’ comes from Greek telos, meaning ‘end’ or ‘purpose’; nature appears to have purposeful ends, like a watch implies a watchmaker.
目的论（设计）论证 —— 从自然界表面上的目的与秩序推出智能设计者。「目的论」源自希腊语 telos，意为「目的」；自然似乎具有目的性，就像手表暗示着钟表匠。
Problem of evil — the challenge that an all‑powerful, all‑loving God is incompatible with the existence of evil. The logical puzzle: if God can and wants to prevent evil, why does evil exist? Remember the ‘unevil triangle’ of omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and evil — something must give.
恶的问题 —— 对全能、全善的上帝与恶的存在并非相容的挑战。逻辑谜题：如果上帝能够而且愿意阻止恶，为什么还有恶存在？记住全知、全能、全善与恶构成的「非恶三角」——总得有一个角被牺牲。
6. Logic and Argument: Reasoning Skills | 逻辑与论证：推理技能
Deduction — reasoning where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises; if premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Think ‘deduce’ as ‘de‑duce’ — leading down from general principles to a specific, inescapable conclusion.
演绎 —— 结论必然从前提得出的推理；若前提为真，结论必然为真。将「演绎」理解为「推导而下」——从一般原理通往一个具体的、无法逃脱的结论。
Induction — reasoning where the premises provide probable support for the conclusion, but do not guarantee it. ‘In‑duct’ — like air flowing in through a duct: evidence flows in and raises the probability, but never seals the case airtight.
归纳 —— 前提为结论提供或然性支持、但不保证结论为真的推理。「归纳」好比「归拢接纳」——证据从各处流入，提高了概率，但永远不密封案件。
Abduction (inference to the best explanation) — selecting the hypothesis that best explains the available evidence. Like a detective ‘abducting’ the most plausible story from clues; it is not forced but is the most reasonable guess.
溯因（最佳解释推理） —— 选择最能解释现有证据的假说。就像侦探从线索中「劫持」（abduct）出一个最合理的故事；它不是被强迫的，而是最合理的猜测。
Valid vs. sound — a deductive argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises; it is sound if, additionally, the premises are actually true. Valid = shape of the argument is good; Sound = the argument has truthful input. Picture a perfect funnel (valid) into which you pour true premises (sound) to get a guaranteed true conclusion.
有效 vs. 可靠 —— 一个演绎论证是有效的，当且仅当结论在逻辑上从前提中得出；若此外前提实际上为真，则该论证是可靠的。有效=论证结构良好；可靠=输入内容真实。想象一个完美的漏斗（有效），你把真实的前提倒进去（可靠），就能得到必定为真的结论。
7. Political Philosophy: Justice and Authority | 政治哲学：正义与权威
Social contract — the idea that individuals consent, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some freedoms in exchange for the protection of a state. Think of a contract you sign with society: you give up the right to steal, and in return, the state protects your property.
社会契约 —— 个人以明示或默示的方式同意让渡某些自由，以换取国家保护的理念。想象你与社会签署的一份合同：你放弃偷窃的自由，作为回报，国家保护你的财产。
Utilitarian justice — justice is a matter of promoting the greatest overall happiness; rights and fairness derive from this principle. Frame it as a giant happiness pie: a just society cuts the pie to maximise total enjoyment, not necessarily equal slices.
功利主义正义 —— 正义在于促进最大整体幸福；权利与公平皆由此原则导出。把它看作一个巨大的幸福派：一个正义的社会会为了最大化总体的美味而切派，不一定要求每人分得均等。
Libertarianism — the political philosophy that emphasises individual liberty, free markets, and minimal state intervention. ‘Liberty’ is the star; the state should be a night‑watchman, only protecting people from force and fraud.
自由意志主义 —— 强调个人自由、自由市场与最小国家干预的政治哲学。「自由」（liberty）是主角；国家应只是一个守夜人，仅仅保护人们免受暴力和欺诈。
Rawls’ veil of ignorance — a thought experiment where you design a just society without knowing your own position in it, ensuring impartiality. Imagine a thick ‘veil’ that hides your social class, talents, and wealth, forcing you to make rules fair for everyone.
罗尔斯的无知之幕 —— 一个思想实验，你在不知道自己在社会中地位的情况下设计正义社会，以保证公正性。想象一道厚厚的「幕」，遮住了你的社会阶层、才能和财富，迫使你制定对所有人都公平的规则。
8. Aesthetics: Beauty and Art | 美学：美与艺术
Aesthetic experience — a distinctive kind of perceptual or emotional experience directed at beauty, art, or nature, often marked by disinterested pleasure. The word shares a root with ‘anaesthetic’; without anaesthetic, your senses are wide awake to beauty.
审美经验 —— 指向美、艺术或自然的一种特殊的知觉或情感体验，通常以无利害的愉悦为特征。该词与「麻醉」（anaesthetic）同根；没有麻醉剂，你的感官就会对美保持清醒。
The sublime — an aesthetic quality that inspires awe and terror mingled with pleasure, often triggered by vast or powerful natural scenes. Think of a ‘sub‑lime’ fruit — sharp and sweet at the same time; the sublime blends fear and exhilaration.
崇高 —— 一种激发敬畏与恐惧、同时又夹杂愉悦的审美品质，通常由宏大或强大的自然景象引发。想象一种「似柠檬又似糖」的水果——酸与甜同时并存；崇高将恐惧与振奋融为一体。
Intentional fallacy — the mistake of evaluating a work of art based on the artist’s intended meaning rather than what the work itself expresses. The ‘fallacy’ is thinking you need to crawl into the artist’s head; instead, judge the painting on the canvas.
意图谬误 —— 评价艺术作品时错误地以艺术家的意图含义为依据，而不是依据作品本身所表达的内容。「谬误」在于你认为需要钻进艺术家的脑袋里；事实上，应该根据画布上的作品本身来评判。
Formalism — the theory that the aesthetic value of art resides solely in its formal properties (lines, colours, composition), not in content or context. A formalist looks at art like a ‘form’; the shape and pattern matter more than the story.
形式主义 —— 认为艺术的审美价值完全在于其形式特性（线条、色彩、构图），而非内容或情境的理论。形式主义者像看「形式」一样看待艺术；形状和图案比故事更重要。
9. Key Thinkers and Their Ideas | 关键思想家及其思想
Plato’s Theory of Forms — the view that non‑physical, abstract forms (or ideas) represent the most accurate reality, and the physical world is a shadow or imitation. Picture a ‘plate‑o’ of perfect forms — a perfect circle, perfect justice — all floating above our flawed copies.
柏拉图的理型论 —— 认为非物质的、抽象的理型（或理念）代表了最真实的存在，而物理世界只是它的影子或摹本。想象一「碟」完美的理型——完美的圆形、完美的正义——悬浮于我们有缺陷的复制品之上。
Aristotle’s Four Causes — explanations for why a thing exists: material cause (what it is made of), formal cause (its essence), efficient cause (what brought it into being), final cause (its purpose). Remember ‘A‑Friend Met a Fishy Ending’: Material, Formal, Efficient, Final.
亚里士多德的四因说 —— 解释事物为何存在的四种原因：质料因（由什么构成）、形式因（本质是什么）、动力因（由什么使之产生）、目的因（目的为何）。用首字母记忆「只见一只猫」（质、形、动、目）。
Descartes’ Cogito — ‘I think, therefore I am’ (Cogito, ergo sum): the indubitable foundation of knowledge. Visualise Descartes’ thought bubble saying ‘Cogito’ — even if an evil demon deceives him, he cannot doubt that he is thinking.
笛卡尔的我思 —— 「我思故我在」：知识不可怀疑的基石。想象笛卡尔的思考气泡中浮现出「我思」二字——即使有邪恶的恶魔欺骗他，他也无法怀疑自己正在思考这件事。
Hume’s fork — the division of all true propositions into two kinds: relations of ideas (a priori, e.g. mathematics) and matters of fact (a posteriori, e.g. the sun will rise). Fork in the road: left prong = ideas, right prong = facts; anything that is neither should be committed to the flames.
休谟的叉子 —— 将所有真命题分为两类：观念的关系（先天，如数学）和事实（后天，如太阳会升起）。岔路口（fork）：左叉齿=观念，右叉齿=事实；任何不属于这两类的东西都应投入火中。
10. Exam Tips and Common Pitfalls | 考试技巧与常见误区
Define your terms immediately — in any essay, start by clarifying the key concept. A marker cannot award marks for a brilliant argument if they are unsure what you mean by ‘dualism’. Use the memory tricks above to write a crisp, accurate definition in the opening paragraph.
立即定义术语 —— 在任何论文中，一开始就要澄清关键概念。如果阅卷官不确定你所说的「二元论」是什么意思，他们无法为一个精彩的论证打分。利用上述记忆技巧，在开头段写下简明准确的定义。
Use the PEEL structure — Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link. Make your point, back it with a philosopher or example, explain the reasoning, and link back to the question. Picture a banana ‘PEEL’ — each part must be intact for the argument to be digestible.
使用 PEEL 结构 —— 论点、证据、解释、联系。提出你的论点，用哲学家或例子支撑，解释推理过程，再回扣问题。想象一根香蕉（PEEL）——每一部分都必须完整，论证才好消化。
Avoid the ‘name‑drop’ trap — simply mentioning a philosopher’s name without showing how their idea relates to the question is a waste of time. Always say why the thinker is relevant. Think of names as ingredients in a recipe; you must explain what flavour they bring to the dish.
避免「点名陷阱」 —— 仅仅提一下哲学家的名字而不说明其观点与问题如何相关，是在浪费时间。务必说明这位思想家为何重要。把名字想象成菜谱中的食材；你必须说明它们为这道菜带来了什么风味。
Balance evaluation — OCR exams reward critical analysis, not one‑sided answers. After presenting a theory, give a counter‑argument and respond to it. Visualise a set of scales: for high marks, the scales should tip both ways before you reach a reasoned conclusion.
平衡评价 —— OCR 考试奖励批判性分析，而非片面的答案。在呈现一个理论之后，给出反论证并回应它。想象一架天平：要得高分，在你得出合理结论之前，天平应该朝两边各倾斜一次。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导