Year 12 WJEC Law: Key Vocabulary & Terminology Quick Study Guide | WJEC法律：关键词汇术语速记指南

📚 Year 12 WJEC Law: Key Vocabulary & Terminology Quick Study Guide | WJEC法律：关键词汇术语速记指南

Mastering legal terminology is essential for success in Year 12 WJEC Law. This guide breaks down key concepts from the nature of law, precedent, statutory interpretation, criminal liability, and tort law into clear definitions and memory aids. Each term is paired with its Chinese equivalent to help bilingual learners grasp and recall the language of law quickly.

掌握法律术语对于在WJEC法律Year 12考试中取得成功至关重要。本指南将法律本质、先例、制定法解释、刑事责任以及侵权法中的关键概念分解为清晰的定义和记忆辅助工具。每个术语都配有中文对应词，帮助双语学习者快速理解和记忆法律语言。

1. Ratio Decidendi & Obiter Dicta | 判决理由与附带意见

The ratio decidendi is the legal principle or reason that forms the basis of a court’s decision. It is the binding element of a judgment and must be followed by lower courts in future cases with similar material facts. Obiter dicta, meaning ‘other things said’, are comments made by the judge that are not essential to the decision; they are persuasive but not binding.

判决理由（ratio decidendi）是构成法院裁决基础的法律原则或理由。它是判决中具有约束力的部分，下级法院在今后具有类似重要事实的案件中必须遵循。附带意见（obiter dicta，意为“顺便说说的其他话”）是法官发表的非必要评论；它们具有说服力，但不具有约束力。

Memory aid: Think of ‘ratio’ as the ‘reason for the decision’ – the core legal rule. For ‘obiter’, imagine a judge saying ‘by the way…’ (obiter). The binding power of ratio is what makes judicial precedent a central source of English law.

记忆法：将“ratio”理解为“判决的理由”——核心法律规则。对于“obiter”，想象法官说“顺便提一下……”。判决理由的约束力使得司法先例成为英国法律的核心法源之一。

2. Binding and Persuasive Precedents | 约束性先例与说服性先例

A binding precedent is a previous decision from a higher court within the same hierarchy that must be followed by a lower court. The ratio decidendi creates the binding element. A persuasive precedent, on the other hand, is not compulsory but may influence a court’s decision; it can come from lower courts, obiter dicta, decisions of courts in other jurisdictions (e.g., Australia, Canada), or the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

约束性先例是指在同一个法院等级体系中，由上级法院作出的、下级法院必须遵循的先前判决。判决理由（ratio decidendi）形成了约束部分。而说服性先例则不具有强制性，但可能影响法院的裁决；说服性先例可源自下级法院、附带意见、其他司法管辖区（如澳大利亚、加拿大）法院的判决，或枢密院司法委员会的决定。

A quick way to differentiate: Binding = ‘must follow’ (vertical hierarchy). Persuasive = ‘may follow’ (horizontal or external influence). The Supreme Court (formerly the House of Lords) is the highest authority in England and Wales, and its decisions bind all lower courts.

快速区分：约束性 = “必须遵循”（垂直等级）。说服性 = “可以遵循”（横向或外部影响）。最高法院（即原来的上议院）是英格兰和威尔士的最高权威，其判决对所有下级法院具有约束力。

3. Statutory Interpretation: Literal, Golden and Mischief Rules | 制定法解释：文义规则、黄金规则与不确切文字规则

The literal rule requires judges to give words their plain, ordinary, dictionary meaning, even if the result seems absurd. For example, in Whitely v Chappell (1868), a statute made it an offence to impersonate ‘any person entitled to vote’; the defendant impersonated a dead person, and the court held that a dead person is not a person entitled to vote, so the defendant was acquitted. The golden rule moderates the literal rule by allowing a departure from the ordinary meaning to avoid an absurd outcome. It has two versions: narrow (choosing between possible meanings) and wide (modifying the wording to avoid repugnancy). The mischief rule, originating from Heydon’s Case (1584), looks at the gap or ‘mischief’ in the common law that the Act was designed to remedy, and interprets the words to suppress the mischief.

文义规则要求法官按照词语的普通、日常、字典含义来解释，即使结果看起来荒谬。例如，在Whitely v Chappell (1868)案中，一项法规规定冒充“有权投票的人”构成犯罪；被告人冒充了一个死者，法院裁定死者不属于有权投票的人，因此被告人被宣告无罪。黄金规则是对文义规则的修正，允许偏离词语的通常含义以避免荒谬的结果。它有两种运用方式：狭义黄金规则（在可选择的含义中选取）和广义黄金规则（修改措辞

Published by TutorHao | Year 12 法律 Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）