CAIE A-Level Drama 2026: Exam Changes and Trends | CAIE A-Level 戏剧 2026：考试变化与趋势

📚 CAIE A-Level Drama 2026: Exam Changes and Trends | CAIE A-Level 戏剧 2026：考试变化与趋势

The 2026 examination series marks a watershed moment for CAIE A-Level Drama. With the retirement of the legacy 9696 syllabus and the first full assessment of the redesigned 9487 specification, students and teachers are navigating a fresh landscape of written examination, practical coursework and reflective analysis. This article unpacks the key structural changes, shifts in assessment philosophy and emerging pedagogical trends that will define success in 2026 and beyond. Understanding these developments is not just about passing an exam — it is about becoming a more versatile, critically aware theatre-maker.

2026年的考试季是 CAIE A-Level 戏剧学科的分水岭。随着旧版 9696 大纲退出舞台，重新设计的 9487 大纲迎来首次完整评估，师生们正面对一个全新的书面考试、实践作业与反思性分析并重的体系。本文将剖析关键的结构变化、评估理念的转向以及正在形成的教学趋势，这些都决定着 2026 年及今后的成功。理解这些发展不仅关乎通过考试，更关乎成长为一名更灵活、更具批判意识的戏剧创作者。

1. Overview of the 2026 Syllabus Reforms | 2026 年教学大纲改革总览

The transition from syllabus 9696 to 9487 is more than a routine update. The new qualification, designed for first teaching in 2024 and first examination in 2026, restructures the relationship between written analysis, devised performance and scripted production. It introduces a mandatory practitioner study, reduces the number of discrete components but deepens their intellectual demands, and places assessment at the intersection of theory, practice and personal reflection. Teachers familiar with the old model will notice immediately that the new components are more integrated and that the mark schemes reward process as much as final product.

从 9696 大纲向 9487 的过渡并非一次例行更新。新资格从 2024 年开始教学、2026 年首次考试，重新构建了书面分析、原创表演与剧本制作之间的关系。它引入了必修的戏剧实践者研习，减少了独立组件的数量却加深了各自的智力要求，并将评估置于理论、实践与个人反思的交汇点上。熟悉旧模式的教师会立刻发现，新组件的整合程度更高，评分方案既奖励最终成果也同样看重创作过程。

2. Component 1: Drama and Theatre — A New Written Examination | 组件一：戏剧与剧场——全新的书面考试

The 3‑hour written paper carries 80 marks and accounts for 40% of the A‑Level. It is divided into three distinct sections. Section A requires a focused essay on one of the set practitioners, demanding detailed knowledge of their techniques, theoretical writings and historical context. Section B presents an unseen extract from a chosen set play and asks candidates to interpret it as a director, designer or performer. Section C is a longer essay on a second set play, where students must demonstrate a holistic understanding of how dramatic meaning is constructed through text, staging and audience reception. The paper rewards depth over breadth and insists that answers are rooted in specific theatrical vocabulary.

这场三小时的书面考试占 80 分，计 A‑Level 总分的 40%。试卷分为三个不同部分。A 部分要求就指定戏剧实践者撰写一篇聚焦性论文，需要详细了解其技法、理论著述及历史背景。B 部分提供一段选自指定剧本的未见选段，要求考生以导演、设计师或表演者的身份进行解读。C 部分是针对第二部指定剧本的长篇论文，学生必须展示对戏剧意义如何通过文本、舞台呈现与观众接受而被建构的整体理解。这份试卷奖赏深度而非广度，并坚持答案必须扎根于具体的剧场语汇。

3. Key Changes in Component 2: Creating Original Drama | 组件二：原创戏剧创作的关键变化

Component 2 moves away from the older devised performance model towards a more document‑rich process. Worth 60 marks and 30% of the total, it requires learners to create an original piece of devised drama in response to a stimulus, but the centre of gravity has shifted towards the Working Notebook. This portfolio not only records the devising journey but also critically evaluates the application of practitioner methodologies in rehearsal and performance. The final performance is captured on video, and the notebook must demonstrate analytical rigour, linking creative choices to theoretical concepts. Successful candidates treat the notebook as a living document, one that charts both experimentation and informed decision‑making.

组件二脱离了旧有的原创表演模式，转而走向更注重文献记录的过程。该部分占 60 分、总分的 30%，要求学生根据刺激物创作一部原创戏剧，但重心已转移至工作日志。这份作品集不仅记录编排历程，还批判性地评估实践者方法在排练与表演中的应用。最终表演以视频形式提交，工作日志必须展现分析性的严谨，将创意选择与理论概念挂钩。成功的考生会把工作日志视为一份活的文件，既记录实验也反映有依据的决策。

4. Component 3: Making Theatre — From Page to Stage | 组件三：制作剧场——从剧本到舞台

Component 3, also worth 60 marks (30%), centres on the practical exploration of three extracts taken from three different published plays. Two extracts are studied as workshops, while the third culminates in a fully realised performance examined by a visiting examiner or submitted as a high‑quality recording. A Reflective Report accompanies the final performance, analysing the interpretative journey and evaluating the effectiveness of the artistic choices. This component is designed to assess the student’s ability to move seamlessly between text analysis, directorial vision and performance realisation, embodying the notion that theatre‑making is a continuous cycle of research, rehearsal and refinement.

组件三同样占 60 分（30%），围绕三部不同出版剧本中三个选段的实践探索展开。其中两个选段以工作坊形式学习，第三个选段则最终形成完整演出，由外派考官评分或以高质量录像提交。最终演出须附反思报告，分析解读历程并评估艺术选择的有效性。该组件旨在评估学生是否能够在文本分析、导演构想与表演实现之间无缝转换，体现出剧场创作是一个研究、排练与精进不断循环的理念。

5. Shifts in Assessment Objectives and Weightings | 评估目标与权重的转变

The 2026 specification reorganises the three assessment objectives into a more interconnected framework. AO1 (Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of drama and theatre) is now embedded within practically orientated tasks rather than tested in isolation. AO2 (Apply knowledge and understanding when creating drama) receives greater weighting through the Working Notebook and Reflective Report, while AO3 (Analyse and evaluate their own work and the work of others) is woven across all components. The overall effect is a reduction in pure recall and an increase in the demand for synthesis, critical thinking and self‑evaluation. Students must be prepared to show how theory informs practice and how practice illuminates theory.

2026 年大纲将三项评估目标重组为更紧密关联的框架。AO1（展示对戏剧与剧场的知识与理解）现嵌入实践取向的任务中，而非孤立考查。AO2（在创作戏剧时应用知识与理解）通过工作日志和反思报告获得更大权重，而 AO3（分析并评价自己及他人的作品）贯穿所有组件。总的效果是减少了对纯记忆的要求，提升了对于综合、批判性思维与自我评价的呼唤。学生必须准备好展示理论如何引导实践，实践又如何照亮理论。

6. Emphasis on Practitioner Study and Theoretical Application | 对实践者研习与理论应用的重视

One of the most significant departures is the requirement to study a prescribed theatre practitioner in depth across all components. Practitioners such as Brecht, Artaud, Stanislavski, Kneehigh, Complicité or Frantic Assembly are listed, and candidates must use their methodologies as a lens for both creating and analysing work. In Component 1, the essay demands precise understanding of the practitioner’s theoretical writings and rehearsal techniques. In Components 2 and 3, students are expected to adopt, adapt and subvert these approaches in their own making. This integration signals a move towards a more academic yet embodied mode of study, where taking a practitioner’s philosophy seriously becomes a vehicle for original theatre.

最显著的变革之一是在所有组件中需要深入研习一位指定的戏剧实践者。可选名单包括布莱希特、阿尔托、斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基、Kneehigh、Complicité 或 Frantic Assembly 等，考生必须以这些实践者的方法论为透镜，既指导创作也用于分析。在组件一中，论文要求精准理解该实践者的理论论述与排练技术。在组件二与组件三中，学生应在其自身的创作中采用、调整甚至颠覆这些方法。这种整合标志着一种更具学术性又身体力行的学习模式，让认真对待实践者哲学成为原创戏剧的载体。

7. The Role of Devising and Collaboration | 原创编排与协作的作用

Devising remains at the heart of the qualification, but its assessment has become more structured and transparent. Groups must negotiate roles, select stimuli and develop material collectively, yet the Working Notebook ensures individual accountability. Each candidate submits a unique record of the process, explaining their personal contribution and justifying artistic decisions with reference to practitioner theory. This dual focus on ensemble work and individual reflection teaches learners that collaboration is not about dissolving the self, but about finding one’s voice within a shared creative enterprise — a skill that resonates well beyond the exam hall.

原创编排仍是资格证书的核心，但评估方式变得更加结构化和透明。小组必须协商角色、选择刺激物并共同发展素材，而工作日志则确保个体问责。每位考生提交独特的创作过程记录，说明个人贡献并以实践者理论为依据论证艺术决定。这种对集体工作与个人反思的双重关注教会学习者，协作并非消融自我，而是在共同的创意事业中寻找到自己的声音——这一技能在考场之外同样引起共鸣。

8. Integration of Digital and Multimedia Elements | 数字化与多媒体元素的整合

From video‑recorded performances to digitally submitted portfolios, the 2026 syllabus embraces technology as a tool for documentation, dissemination and analysis. Candidates are expected to use multimedia evidence within their Working Notebook, embedding annotated stills, hyperlinks to short clips and scanned rehearsal logs. In the classroom, lessons increasingly incorporate digital soundscapes, projection design and telematic influences drawn from contemporary performance practice. This trend reflects the industry’s own evolution and prepares students for a theatrical landscape where digital literacy is as essential as physical presence. Teachers are advised to build digital fluency incrementally throughout Year 12 and 13.

从录制的演出视频到数字化提交的作品集，2026 年大纲将技术视为记录、传播与分析的工具。考生应在其工作日志中使用多媒体证据，嵌入带有注释的剧照、短片段超链接和扫描的排练日志。在课堂上，教学日益融入数字音景、投影设计以及来自当代表演实践的远程互动影响。这一趋势反映了行业自身的演变，帮助学生为数字化素养与实体存在同等重要的戏剧图景做好准备。建议教师在整个 12 和 13 年级逐步培养学生的数字流畅能力。

9. Global and Intercultural Perspectives | 全球与跨文化视角

The set text lists now feature a more diverse range of playwrights, including works from African, Asian and South American traditions. This shift encourages students to engage with non‑Western performance conventions, storytelling structures and cultural philosophies. When exploring a practitioner, candidates are prompted to consider how methods travel across borders and how intercultural dialogue can enrich or complicate a theatrical vocabulary. The examination questions increasingly reward awareness of global contexts, pushing learners to become not merely consumers of drama but culturally responsive interpreters who can navigate multiple aesthetic systems with sensitivity and insight.

现在指定文本列表涵盖了更加多元的剧作家，包括来自非洲、亚洲和南美传统的作品。这一转变鼓励学生接触非西方的表演惯例、叙事结构和文化哲学。在探究实践者时，考生被引导思考方法如何跨越国界，以及跨文化对话如何丰富或复杂化剧场语汇。考试命题越来越奖赏对全球语境的意识，推动学习者不仅成为戏剧的消费者，更要成为具有文化响应力的阐释者，能够以敏感和洞见驾驭多重审美体系。

10. Preparing for the 2026 Exams: Strategies and Resources | 应对 2026 年考试：策略与资源

Building an effective revision plan starts with mapping the syllabus components to a timeline. For the written paper, students should create practitioner profiles that synthesise theory, historical context and practical exercises. Regular practice with unseen extracts under timed conditions sharpens the instinct to make quick but justifiable directorial choices. For coursework, maintaining a habit of reflective journalling from the very first workshop ensures the Working Notebook is rich in detail. Accessing examiner reports, sample marked work and the official CAIE 9487 support materials provides insight into what top‑level responses actually look like. Study groups that rotate between devising, performing and writing criticism mirror the collaborative spirit of the course itself.

制定有效的复习计划首先需要将大纲各组件映射到时间线上。对于书面考试，学生应建立实践者档案，综合理论、历史背景和实操练习。定时练习未见选段可以磨炼迅速做出有理有据导演抉择的本能。在课程作业方面，从第一次工作坊起就养成反思日记的习惯，能确保工作日志内容丰富。查阅考官报告、评分样本和 CAIE 9487 官方支持材料，可以洞悉高分答案的真实样貌。在原创编排、表演与写作评论之间轮换的学习小组，恰好映射了该课程本身的协作精神。

11. Trends in Set Texts and Stimulus Material | 指定文本与刺激材料的趋势

Recent patterns indicate that CAIE is favouring texts that reward kinaesthetic, visual and aural investigation alongside literary analysis. Plays with fragmented structures, choral elements or multi‑roling possibilities — such as those by Caryl Churchill, debbie tucker green or Alecky Blythe — are becoming common choices. Stimulus materials for devising are increasingly drawn from photographic art, verbatim transcripts and contemporary news reports, challenging students to move beyond straightforward narrative. This shift demands that candidates develop visual literacy and the ability to identify theatrical potential in non‑dramatic sources, a skill worth cultivating early in the course.

最近的趋势表明，CAIE 倾向于奖赏那些能够在文学分析之外进行动觉、视觉与听觉探究的文本。具有碎片化结构、歌队元素或可多重扮演的剧本——例如出自卡里尔·丘吉尔、黛比·塔克·格林或阿莱基·布莱斯之手的作品——正成为常见选择。原创编排的刺激材料越来越多地来自摄影艺术、逐字稿笔录和当代新闻报道，挑战学生超越简单叙事。这一变化要求考生发展视觉素养，以及从非戏剧源头识别剧场潜力的能力，这一技能值得在课程初期就开始培养。

12. Conclusion: Embracing the Future of Drama Education | 结论：拥抱戏剧教育的未来

The 2026 CAIE A‑Level Drama examination does not merely test a body of knowledge; it captures a moment of educational evolution. By placing equal value on written eloquence, practical inventiveness and honest self‑reflection, the new syllabus mirrors the complexity of modern theatre‑making. Students who embrace research‑driven practice, master the language of critique and remain open to intercultural dialogues will find themselves not only prepared for high marks but also equipped for further study and creative careers. The challenge is real, but so is the opportunity: 2026 is the year to turn classroom drama into a lasting artistic habit.

2026 年 CAIE A‑Level 戏剧考试不仅考查一套知识体系，更捕捉了教育演进的一个时刻。通过同等重视书面辩才、实践创意与诚实的自我反思，新大纲映照出现代剧场创作的复杂性。那些拥抱研究驱动实践、掌握评论语言并对跨文化对话保持开放的学生，不仅为高分做好了准备，也为进一步深造和创意职业做好了储备。挑战确实存在，但机遇同样真实：2026 年正是将课堂戏剧转化为持久艺术习惯的一年。

Published by TutorHao | Drama Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）