📚 Mastering IGCSE WJEC History: Exam Techniques and Marking Criteria | IGCSE WJEC 历史：答题技巧与评分标准
Success in IGCSE WJEC History depends not just on factual knowledge, but on understanding how to deploy that knowledge effectively under exam conditions. This guide breaks down the key skills, assessment objectives and marking criteria so you can craft answers that examiners reward with top marks.
在IGCSE WJEC历史考试中取得成功，不仅取决于对史实的掌握，更在于如何有效地在考场上运用这些知识。本指南将详细解析关键技能、评分目标和评分标准，帮助您写出考官青睐的高分答案。
1. Understanding the Exam Structure | 理解考试结构
The WJEC IGCSE History qualification typically consists of two examined units, each covering different historical themes. Unit 1 often includes a depth study with source-based questions, while Unit 2 may focus on a thematic study requiring extended essays. Knowing exactly what each paper demands is the first step to efficient revision.
WJEC IGCSE历史资格证书通常包含两个笔试单元，每个单元涵盖不同的历史主题。第一单元往往包含深度研究，并设有基于史料的题目；第二单元可能聚焦专题研究，要求撰写扩展性论文。准确了解每份试卷的要求，是高效复习的第一步。
Each exam paper is structured to test specific skills across different question types. You will encounter source analysis questions, which ask you to evaluate utility, reliability or make comparisons; narrative account questions, requiring a clear story of events; and judgement questions, where you must weigh up factors and reach a supported conclusion.
每份试卷的结构都旨在通过不同题型测试特定技能。你会遇到史料分析题，要求评估效用、可靠性或进行比较；叙述说明题，需要清晰地讲述事件经过；以及评判题，必须权衡各项因素并得出有依据的结论。
Common question stems include ‘Use Source A and your own knowledge to explain…’, ‘How useful is Source B…?’, ‘Describe…’, ‘Explain why…’ and ‘To what extent do you agree…?’. Familiarising yourself with these stems will help you recognise what the examiner is looking for immediately.
常见的提问句式包括“利用史料A和你自己的知识解释……”、“史料B有多大用处……？”、“描述……”、“解释为什么……”以及“你在多大程度上同意……？”。熟悉这些句式能帮助你立刻把握考官的意图。
2. Assessment Objectives (AOs) | 评分目标
WJEC IGCSE History uses three main Assessment Objectives: AO1 (knowledge and understanding), AO2 (explanation and analysis) and AO3 (source evaluation and interpretation). Each question targets these objectives in a carefully weighted way, and your mark depends on demonstrating all required AOs at the appropriate level.
WJEC IGCSE历史有三个主要评分目标：AO1（知识与理解）、AO2（解释与分析）和AO3（史料评估与解读）。每道题都以精心配比的方式指向这些目标，你的得分取决于能否在相应层次上展示所有要求的目标。
AO1 is about recalling accurate historical facts, dates, names and terminology, and showing understanding of key features and consequences. Simply listing facts without linking them to the question will only gain low AO1 marks. You need to select and deploy knowledge that directly addresses the focus of the question.
AO1关乎回忆准确的历史事实、日期、人名和术语，并展现对关键特征与结果的理解。仅仅罗列事实而不与问题挂钩，只能拿到很低的AO1分数。你必须选择并运用直接切题的知识。
AO2 involves explaining causes, consequences, change and continuity, and analysing the importance or impact of events. This is where you develop chains of reasoning, show how one event led to another, and explore differing interpretations. Strong AO2 answers move beyond description into ‘why’ and ‘how’ something happened.
AO2涉及解释原因、后果、变化与延续，以及分析事件的重要性或影响。这里你需要构建推理链条，展示事件如何互相引发，并探讨不同解释。出色的AO2答案会超越描述，深入到某事“为什么”和“怎样”发生。
AO3 is tested mainly through source questions. You must evaluate the utility of sources, considering their content, provenance (nature, origin, purpose) and typicality. You should also cross-reference between sources and with your own knowledge to assess reliability. Do not treat sources as ‘biased’ or ‘unbiased’ simplistically, but weigh up their value despite limitations.
AO3主要通过史料题来考查。你必须评估史料的效用，考虑其内容、出处（性质、来源、目的）和典型性。你还应该交叉对照史料之间以及与你自身知识之间的信息，以评估可靠性。不要简单地将史料归为“有偏见”或“无偏见”，而要权衡其价值，即使存在局限性。
3. Source Analysis Basics | 史料分析基础
When approaching any source, begin with the five Ws: Who wrote it, When, Where, What does it say, and Why was it produced. This provenance analysis is the foundation for evaluating utility and reliability. Always read the caption carefully; it contains clues about authorship, date and context.
面对任何史料，先从五个W入手：作者是谁、何时创作、何处创作、内容是什么、以及为什么创作。这种出处分析是评估效用与可靠性的基础。务必仔细阅读图注，它包含关于作者、日期和背景的线索。
Next, extract key information from the source itself. Underline or mentally note phrases that directly support your answer. You need to quote or closely paraphrase the source to show you have engaged with it. Avoid merely describing the source; you must use it as evidence for a point. For example, ‘Source A reveals… because it states “…”‘.
接下来，从史料本身提取关键信息。划出或心里记下能直接支持你答案的短语。你需要引用或紧密转述史料，以表明你已经认真研读了它。避免仅仅描述史料；你必须把它当作论据来使用。例如：“史料A揭示了……，因为它提到‘……’”。
Contextual knowledge is essential to unlock the full meaning of a source. You might know, for example, that the author was writing under censorship, which would affect the content. Or you might recognise an event mentioned in the source that helps date it more precisely. Always blend source details with your own knowledge to create a rich analysis.
背景知识对于解锁史料的完整含义至关重要。例如，你可能知道作者是在审查制度下写作，这会影响到内容。或者，你可能识别出史料中提到的某个事件，从而更精确地断定其年代。始终将史料细节与你自身的知识相结合，构建深入的分析。
4. Evaluating Utility and Reliability | 评估效用与可靠性
Utility is about how useful a source is for a specific enquiry. A source can be useful even if it is incomplete or emotive, because it tells us about attitudes or perspectives of the time. A propaganda poster, for instance, may not be factually accurate, but it is highly useful for studying government methods of persuasion.
效用是指史料对于某一特定研究问题有多大用处。史料即使不完整或带有情绪，也可能很有用，因为它能告诉我们当时的观念或视角。例如，一张宣传海报也许在事实上不准确，但对于研究政府的说服手段来说就非常有用。
To evaluate utility, consider both the content and the provenance. Content: what information does the source provide that is relevant? Provenance: how does the nature, origin or purpose of the source make it especially insightful? A private diary entry, for instance, may reveal uncensored personal views that official documents cannot.
要评估效用，需同时考虑内容和出处。内容方面：史料提供了哪些相关信息？出处方面：史料的性质、来源或目的如何使其特别有洞见？例如，一篇私人日记可能揭示出未经审查的个人观点，而官方文件做不到这一点。
Reliability concerns whether we can trust the source’s account. Use cross-referencing: check the source against other sources or your own knowledge. If Source B contradicts established facts, you can say it is unreliable in that respect, but you must also explain why the inaccuracy might exist – perhaps the author had limited information or a deliberate motive to mislead.
可靠性关乎我们能否相信史料的叙述。使用交叉对照法：将史料与其他史料或你自己的知识进行核对。如果史料B与公认事实相矛盾，你可以说它在这方面不可靠，但你还必须解释这种不准确为何会出现——也许作者信息有限，或有意误导。
Avoid the trap of labelling sources simply as ‘biased’. Instead, identify the specific perspective, and then argue why that perspective might limit or enhance the source’s usefulness for the particular question. For example, a British soldier’s account of a battle will reflect his experience and loyalties, making it useful for studying British morale but limited for the enemy’s viewpoint.
避免落入简单地将史料标签为“有偏见”的陷阱。相反，要识别出具体视角，然后论证为什么这种视角可能限制或增强该史料对特定问题的用处。例如，一名英国士兵对某场战役的叙述会反映他的经历和忠诚，这使得它对于研究英军士气很有用，但对于了解敌军视角则有局限。
5. Answering ‘How far’ or ‘To what extent’ Questions | 回答“多大程度上”问题
Judgement questions require you to weigh up different factors and reach a balanced, substantiated conclusion. The wording ‘How far…’ or ‘To what extent…’ signals that you must consider multiple causes, consequences or interpretations, not just agree or disagree completely. Your answer should present a nuanced argument.
评判题要求你权衡不同因素，并得出一个均衡的、有依据的结论。“多大程度上……”这样的措辞意味着你必须考虑多种原因、后果或解释，而不是完全同意或不同意。你的答案应展现出细致入微的论证。
Begin by breaking down the question. If the question asks ‘To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles the main cause of World War II?’, you need to analyse the Treaty’s role, but also present other significant factors such as the Great Depression, the policy of appeasement, and Hitler’s aggressive ideology. Your introduction should signal your line of argument and the factors you will discuss.
首先拆解问题。如果问题问的是“《凡尔赛条约》在多大程度上是第二次世界大战的主要原因？”，你需要分析该条约的作用，但也要提出其他重要因素，如经济大萧条、绥靖政策以及希特勒的侵略意识形态。你的引言部分应该表明你的论证思路和将要讨论的因素。
In each main body paragraph, use a CLEAR structure: Claim – state your point; Link – connect it to the question; Evidence – provide specific facts; Analysis – explain how the evidence supports your claim; and Refer back to the extent – rank the factor’s importance. This ensures your paragraph is always contributing to your overall judgement.
在每个主体段落中，使用CLEAR结构：断言——陈述你的观点；联系——将其与问题连接；证据——提供具体事实；分析——解释证据如何支持你的断言；回扣程度——评估该因素的重要性。这能确保你的段落始终在为整体评判做贡献。
Your conclusion must answer the ‘how far’ directly. It could state that a particular factor was the most significant, but only up to a point, and then explain what other factors were also important and why. Avoid simply repeating earlier points; instead, synthesise your analysis into a final, precise judgement that matches the question’s demand.
你的结论必须直接回答“多大程度上”。它可以指出某个因素是最重要的，但仅限在一定程度内，然后解释其他因素为什么也很重要。避免简单重复前面的观点；相反，要将你的分析综合成一个最终的、精准的评判，满足问题的要求。
6. Planning and Structuring Essays | 作文规划与结构
Before you start writing, spend 3-5 minutes planning. Jot down the key points in a quick mind map or bullet list, arranging them in logical order. Planning prevents you from drifting off-topic and helps you spot links between factors. A planned answer is almost always more coherent and better argued than an unplanned one.
在开始写作前，花3到5分钟做规划。用一个简单的思维导图或要点列表记下关键点，并按逻辑顺序排列。规划能防止你偏离主题，并帮助你发现因素之间的联系。有规划的答案几乎总是比没有规划的更连贯、论证更充分。
A strong essay follows a clear structure: an introduction that sets out the context and your line of argument; a series of body paragraphs each focused on one main point; and a conclusion that ties everything together. For WJEC, body paragraphs benefit from using the PEEL model (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link) to maintain analytical depth.
一篇有力的作文遵循清晰的结构：引言，设定背景和你的论证思路；一系列主体段落，每段聚焦一个主要观点；以及一个将一切串联起来的结论。对于WJEC考试，主体段落使用PEEL模型（观点、证据、解释、联系）有助于保持分析的深度。
In the introduction, define key terms if necessary, and state your final judgement in a nutshell. This ‘thesis statement’ gives the examiner a roadmap. For example: ‘While the Wall Street Crash was the immediate trigger, the Great Depression was rooted in longer-term structural weaknesses in the global economy, which this essay will explore.’
在引言中，如有必要可界定关键术语，并用一句话概括你的最终判断。这个“主题陈述”给考官提供了一个路线图。例如：“虽然华尔街崩盘是直接触发因素，但大萧条的根源在于全球经济中的长期结构性弱点，本文将对此进行探讨。”
During writing, use linking words to show the relationship between ideas: ‘furthermore’, ‘moreover’ for addition; ‘however’, ‘on the other hand’ for contrast; ‘as a result’, ‘consequently’ for causation; ‘for instance’, ‘specifically’ for illustration. These signposts guide the examiner through your argument and improve the coherence of your writing.
在写作过程中，使用连接词来展示观点之间的关系：增添信息用“此外”、“而且”；对比用“然而”、“另一方面”；因果关系用“结果”、“因此”；举例用“例如”、“具体而言”。这些路标能引导考官理解你的论证，并提升文章的连贯性。
7. Using PEEL for Paragraphs | 使用PEEL段落结构
PEEL stands for Point, Evidence, Explanation, and Link. Each body paragraph should begin with a clear point that directly addresses the question. For example, ‘One reason why the Nazis gained power was their effective use of propaganda.’ This point should be arguable, not just a statement of fact.
PEEL代表观点、证据、解释与联系。每个主体段落都应以一个直接回应问题的清晰观点开头。例如：“纳粹得以掌权的一个原因是他们有效地运用了宣传手段。”这个观点应当是值得论证的，而不仅仅是对事实的陈述。
After stating your point, provide specific evidence. Name key figures, dates, statistics, events or quotes from sources. Vague references like ‘people were unhappy’ will not earn marks; you need ‘By 1932, over six million Germans were unemployed, creating a receptive audience for Nazi promises of work and bread’.
陈述观点之后，提供具体的证据。列出关键人物、日期、统计数据、事件或史料引文。像“人们感到不满”这样模糊的表述不会得分；你需要的是“到1932年，超过六百万德国人失业，这为纳粹的工作与面包承诺创造了易于接受的听众”。
Then, explain how your evidence supports the point. This is the most important part for gaining AO2 marks. Develop a chain of reasoning: why did high unemployment make Nazi promises appealing? How did propaganda exploit this? The explanation should show cause and effect, and ideally consider links to broader context.
然后，解释你的证据如何支持该观点。这是获取AO2分数的最重要部分。构建推理链条：为什么高失业率使纳粹的承诺更具吸引力？宣传是如何利用这一点的？解释应展现因果关系，并最好能联系更广阔的背景。
Finally, link the paragraph back to the question. A linking sentence could say, ‘Therefore, propaganda was significant because it channelled existing discontent into support for the Nazi Party, though it was not the sole factor.’ This wraps up the analysis and prepares for the next point, maintaining momentum.
最后，将本段联系回问题。一个联系性的句子可以说：“因此，宣传之所以重要，是因为它将原有的不满转化为对纳粹党的支持，尽管这不是唯一因素。”这收束了分析，并为下一个观点做了铺垫，保持文章的推进力。
8. Time Management | 时间管理
WJEC IGCSE History papers are time-pressured. As a rule of thumb, allocate time in proportion to the marks available. If a 20-mark question should take about 25-30 minutes, and a 10-mark question about 12-15 minutes. Check the total exam duration and divide accordingly before you start writing.
WJEC IGCSE历史试卷时间紧张。经验法则是，按照分值比例分配时间。如果一道20分的题目大约需要25到30分钟，10分的题目大约12到15分钟。在开始写作前，查看考试总时长并进行相应分配。
Within a single question, divide your time wisely. Spend about 20% of the allocated time planning, 70% writing, and 10% proofreading. Many students lose marks because they jump straight into writing without a plan, causing their argument to become muddled or repetitive, which then requires more time to fix.
在一道题目内部，也要明智地分配时间。将大约20%的时间用于规划，70%用于写作，10%用于检查。许多学生因为不规划就直接动笔而失分，这会导致论证混乱或重复，之后需要更多时间来修正。
For source-based questions, read the sources before looking at the questions, but then focus on the specific source(s) each question targets. Annotate the source quickly: underline key phrases, note the provenance and jot down links to your knowledge. This active reading saves time when constructing your answer.
对于基于史料的题目，先阅读史料再看问题，但随后要专注于每题所针对的具体史料。快速给史料做笔记：划出关键短语，记下出处，并简要写上与自身知识的联系。这种主动式阅读能在构建答案时节省时间。
If you encounter a difficult question, do not panic and spend too long on it. Answer the questions you are confident about first, then return to the tricky one. Even if you are short on time, an outline or bullet points of your planned answer can pick up marks, whereas a blank space will score zero.
如果遇到难题，不要慌张，也不要在上面花费过多时间。先回答你有信心的题目，然后再回来处理棘手的问题。即使时间不足，写下提纲或要点也有可能得分，而空白处则铁定零分。
9. Common Mistakes to Avoid | 常见错误避免
One major error is narrating or describing events without answering the question. An explanation question expects analysis of causes or consequences, not a chronological story. Every sentence you write should serve the purpose of directly addressing the question stem and advancing your argument.
一个主要错误是只叙述或描述事件，而没有回答问题。解释题期待的是对原因或后果的分析，而不是一个按时间顺序的故事。你写的每一句话都应服务于直接回应题干、推进论证的目的。
Another common pitfall is neglecting the provenance of sources. Students often evaluate content thoroughly but forget to discuss the nature, origin or purpose of the source. For a high AO3 mark, provenance must be woven into your evaluation of utility or reliability, not just tagged on at the end.
另一个常见误区是忽略史料的出处。学生往往详细评估内容，却忘记讨论史料的性质、来源或目的。要想拿到高分AO3，出处必须融入到你对效用或可靠性的评估中，而不是在结尾处提一句了事。
Imbalanced arguments are also a frequent issue. In a ‘how far’ question, if you only argue one side without considering counter-factors, you limit your marks to a low band. Always demonstrate that you have considered alternative explanations or the other side of the argument before reaching a conclusion.
论证失衡也是常见的问题。在“多大程度上”问题中，如果你只论证一个方面而不考虑相反的因素，你的分数就会被限制在较低的等级。始终要在得出结论前，展现出你已考虑了其他解释或论点的另一面。
Finally, avoid sweeping generalisations such as ‘everyone supported the war’ or ‘this was the most important event ever’. Use qualifying language like ‘a significant majority’, ‘played a crucial role among multiple factors’, or ‘arguably the most immediate trigger’. This demonstrates historical nuance and improves your AO2 analysis.
最后，避免笼统的概括，如“所有人都支持这场战争”或“这是有史以来最重要的事件”。使用限定性语言，如“绝大多数人”、“在多重因素中扮演了关键角色”或“可以说是最直接的导火索”。这展示出历史分析的细腻性，并能提升你的AO2分析。
10. Revision Tips for WJEC History | 复习技巧
Effective revision is active, not passive. Instead of just reading notes, create timelines, mind maps, flashcards and self-quizzing. Focus on the connections between events, such as cause and consequence chains. Understanding the ‘big picture’ of a period helps you navigate unfamiliar source questions because you will know the context deeply.
有效的复习是主动的，而非被动的。不要只是阅读笔记，而要制作时间线、思维导图、记忆卡片和自我测试。着重关注事件之间的联系，如原因与后果的链条。理解一个时期的“大图景”能帮助你应对陌生的史料题，因为你已深入了解背景。
Practise past papers under timed conditions. WJEC marking schemes are publicly available, so after attempting a question, check what the examiner expected. Pay attention to the level descriptors. This tells you precisely what you need to demonstrate for a Level 5 (highest) mark, such as sustained argument, well-deployed knowledge, and thorough source evaluation.
在计时条件下练习历年真题。WJEC的评分方案是公开的，所以在尝试一道题后，检查考官的期望是什么。注意等级描述语。这能精确地告诉你，要拿到5级（最高级）分数需要展现什么，如持续的论证、运用得当的知识以及透彻的史料评估。
Create condensed notes on the specific themes and depth studies in your syllabus. For each key topic, prepare a ‘cheat sheet’ with essential names, dates, statistics and key events organised by categories like political, economic and social factors. Use this for quick revision before the exam.
为你大纲中的具体主题和深度研究制作浓缩笔记。对于每个关键课题，准备一张“摘要表”，按政治、经济和社会因素等类别列出必要的人名、日期、统计数据和关键事件。考前用这个来快速复习。
Interleave revision by mixing different question types and topics in one study session. This mirrors the exam where you will have to switch between skills rapidly. For instance, spend 20 minutes analysing sources on Weimar Germany, then 20 minutes planning an essay on the Cold War. This builds mental flexibility.
交错式复习，即在一次学习时段中混合不同的题型和课题。这模拟了考试中你必须迅速切换技能的实际情况。例如，花20分钟分析关于魏玛德国的史料，然后用20分钟规划一篇关于冷战的作文。这能培养思维的灵活性。
11. Source Comparison and Cross-Referencing | 史料比较与交叉对照
Many WJEC source questions ask you to compare two or more sources. This requires identifying similarities and differences in content, tone or perspective, and then explaining why those differences exist. Do not just list points of comparison; you must analyse the reasons behind them, often using provenance.
许多WJEC史料题要求你比较两个或以上的史料。这需要识别内容、语气或视角上的相似与差异，然后解释这些差异为何存在。不要仅仅列举比较点；你必须分析其背后的原因，通常要借助出处。
Start by examining what each source says explicitly. Then look for what is implied or omitted. A comparison might highlight that Source A mentions a violent protest but neglects to say that protesters were met with state brutality, while Source B, an opposition newspaper, focuses on police violence. These contrasting foci reveal the sources’ different purposes.
首先研究每个史料明确说了什么。然后寻找隐含之意或被省略之处。比较可能突出，史料A提到了一场暴力抗议活动，却没说抗议者遭到国家暴力镇压，而史料B是一份反对派报纸，聚焦于警察暴力。这些对比焦点揭示了史料的不同目的。
Use your own knowledge to decide which source’s account is more typical or accurate. However, avoid making the comparison simply about ‘who is right’. Instead, show how the combination of both sources builds a more complete picture. You might say ‘While Source A offers the official justification, Source B reveals the hidden social cost, and together they illuminate the full impact of the policy.’
运用你自身的知识来判断哪个史料的叙述更有代表性或更准确。不过，避免让比较仅仅变成“谁是对的”。相反，要展示两个史料的结合如何构建出更完整的图景。你可以说：“虽然史料A提供了官方辩解，但史料B揭示了隐藏的社会代价，两者相结合，共同阐明了该政策的全部影响。”
Cross-referencing between sources is a high-level skill. If Source B contradicts Source C, point this out, then evaluate which source is more trustworthy in that specific instance and why. Use tentative language like ‘suggests’, ‘implies’ and ‘casts doubt on’ rather than absolute judgements, as historical sources rarely offer complete certainty.
史料间的交叉对照是一项高阶技能。如果史料B与史料C相矛盾，要指出这一点，然后评估在该具体事例中哪个史料更可信，并说明原因。使用“这表明”、“这暗示”和“这让人怀疑”等试探性语言，而不是绝对化的判断，因为历史史料极少提供完全的确定性。
12. Final Exam Day Strategies | 考前最终策略
On the day of the exam, read the entire paper before starting. This gives you an overview of the topics covered and allows your brain to start retrieving relevant information before you commit to a question. Mark the questions you plan to answer if there is choice, and double-check that you are selecting the option best suited to your knowledge.
考试当天，动笔前先通读整份试卷。这能让你了解所涵盖的主题，并在开始答题前让你的大脑开始调取相关信息。如果有选题，标记你打算作答的题目，并再次确认你选择了最符合自己知识的选项。
Read each question twice, underlining command words and key focus. The command word ‘Describe’ needs a different approach from ‘Explain’ or ‘Evaluate’. If a question says ‘Use the source and your own knowledge’, you must do both explicitly, not just one. Missing this instruction is a common and costly error.
每道题读两遍，划出指令词和关键焦点。指令词“描述”需要的作答方式与“解释”或“评估”不同。如果一道题说“利用该史料和你自己的知识”，你必须明确兼顾两者，而不能只用一个。忽视这一指令是常见且代价高昂的错误。
Manage your answer space. If the exam provides a booklet, start each new question on a fresh page and label it clearly. Leave wide margins for additions if needed. Write legibly; examiners can only credit what they can read. If you make a mistake, cross it out neatly and continue, rather than wasting time scribbling it out completely.
管理好答题空间。如果考试提供答题本，每一道新题都从新的一页开始，并清晰标注。留出宽边距以便需要时补充。书写要清晰；考官只能对可读的内容给分。如果写错，整齐地划掉然后继续，不要浪费时间完全涂黑。
Finally, keep an eye on the clock and stick to your time allocations. If you are running out of time on an essay, quickly write your conclusion in note form to show your final judgement. Maintaining a calm, methodical approach throughout the exam will allow you to perform at your best and achieve the grade you deserve.
最后，留意时间，坚持你的时间分配。如果作文时间不够，迅速以笔记形式写下你的结论，以展现你的最终判断。在整个考试过程中保持冷静、有条不紊的方法，将使你发挥出最佳水平，取得应得的分数。
Published by TutorHao | History Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导