Pre-U Edexcel Philosophy: Quick Memory Guide to Key Terms and Vocabulary | Pre-U Edexcel 哲学：词汇术语速记指南

📚 Pre-U Edexcel Philosophy: Quick Memory Guide to Key Terms and Vocabulary | Pre-U Edexcel 哲学：词汇术语速记指南

Mastering philosophical terminology is essential for success in Pre-U Edexcel Philosophy. This guide organises core concepts across epistemology, ethics, philosophy of religion, mind and logic, pairing each term with a clear definition, contextual example and memory aid. By engaging with the paired English–Chinese explanations, you build a durable conceptual network that supports both essay writing and exam analysis.

掌握哲学术语是攻克 Pre-U Edexcel 哲学考试的关键。本指南整理了认识论、伦理学、宗教哲学、心灵哲学与逻辑中的核心概念，每个术语都配有清晰定义、语境示例和记忆提示。通过同步阅读中英双语解释，你能够构建起稳固的概念网络，为论文写作与考试分析提供有力支撑。

1. Epistemology Essentials | 认识论核心术语

Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature, sources and limits of knowledge. Key terms include ‘knowledge’, ‘belief’, ‘justification’ and ‘truth’. The traditional account defines knowledge as justified true belief, although Gettier cases challenge this. Familiarity with these building blocks enables you to dissect any epistemological argument on the Pre-U paper.

认识论是研究知识的本质、来源与界限的哲学分支。核心术语包括“知识”“信念”“辩护”与“真理”。传统上知识被定义为经过辩护的真信念，但葛梯尔反例对此提出了挑战。熟悉这些基本概念能帮助你剖析 Pre-U 试卷中任何认识论论证。

Knowledge (justified true belief): A subject S knows that p if and only if p is true, S believes that p, and S is justified in believing that p. For example, S knows ‘Paris is the capital of France’ because it is true, she believes it, and her belief is based on reliable testimony.

知识（经过辩护的真信念）： 认知者 S 知道命题 p，当且仅当 p 为真，S 相信 p，并且 S 有理由相信 p。例如，S 知道“巴黎是法国首都”，因为该命题为真，她相信它，并且她的信念基于可靠的证词。

Belief: A mental state of holding a proposition to be the case. Belief is necessary for knowledge but not sufficient; a false belief cannot count as knowledge.

信念： 认为某个命题成立的心理状态。信念是知识的必要条件，但不是充分条件；一个错误的信念不能算作知识。

Justification: Evidence or reasoning that supports a belief. An unjustified true belief, such as a lucky guess, does not qualify as knowledge.

辩护： 支持信念的证据或推理。未经辩护的真信念，例如侥幸猜中，不具备知识的资格。

Memory tip: Think of knowledge as a three-legged stool — truth, belief, justification. Remove any leg and it collapses.

记忆提示：把知识想象成一张三脚凳——真理、信念、辩护，缺一不可。

---

2. A Priori, A Posteriori & Necessary Truths | 先天、后天与必然真理

Philosophers distinguish between propositions known independently of experience (a priori) and those known through experience (a posteriori). They also separate necessary truths, which could not be otherwise, from contingent truths. These distinctions underpin debates in rationalism and empiricism.

哲学家区分独立于经验而知的命题（先天）和通过经验而知的命题（后天）。他们还把不可能为假的必然真理与偶然真理分开。这些区分构成了理性主义与经验主义争论的基础。

A priori: Knowledge whose justification does not rely on sensory experience. Mathematical truths (2 + 3 = 5) are standard examples. Mnemonic: ‘A’ for ‘absent experience’.

先天： 其辩护不依赖于感官经验的知识。数学真理（2 + 3 = 5）是典型例子。记忆法：“先”表示“先于经验”。

A posteriori: Knowledge dependent on experience or empirical evidence. ‘The sky is blue’ is a posteriori because you need to look. Think ‘post-experience’.

后天： 依赖于经验或经验证据的知识。“天空是蓝色的”是后天知识，因为你需要观察。可以联想“后”表示“经验之后”。

Necessary truth: A proposition that is true in all possible worlds, e.g. ‘All bachelors are unmarried’. Its denial leads to a contradiction.

必然真理： 在所有可能世界中都为真的命题，例如“所有单身汉都是未婚的”。否定它会导致矛盾。

Contingent truth: A truth that could have been false. ‘Napoleon lost at Waterloo’ is historically true but could have been otherwise.

偶然真理： 本可为假的真理。“拿破仑在滑铁卢战败”在历史上为真，但本可能不是这样。

---

3. Rationalism vs Empiricism | 理性主义与经验主义

This classic debate concerns the primary source of human knowledge. Rationalists argue that reason alone can yield substantial knowledge, while empiricists hold that all knowledge originates in sense experience. Pre-U candidates need to use these labels accurately when discussing Descartes, Hume or Kant.

这场经典争论关乎人类知识的主要来源。理性主义者主张理性本身就能产生实质知识，而经验主义者则认为所有知识都源于感官经验。Pre-U 考生在讨论笛卡尔、休谟或康德时需准确使用这些标签。

Rationalism: The view that some significant knowledge is innate or can be derived through reason independently of the senses. Descartes’ cogito (‘I think, therefore I am’) is an attempt to build knowledge on a rational foundation. Keyword: ‘ratio’ = reason.

理性主义： 认为某些重要知识是天赋的，或可独立于感官通过理性推导。笛卡尔的“我思故我在”尝试将知识建立在理性基础上。关键词：“理”即“理性”。

Empiricism: The thesis that all concepts and knowledge arise from experience. Locke described the mind as a tabula rasa (blank slate) at birth. ‘Empirical’ reminds us of ‘experiment’.

经验主义： 主张所有概念和知识都来自经验的论点。洛克将心灵描述为出生时的“白板”。“经验”一词即指向“经手体验”。

Innate ideas: Ideas present in the mind from birth, not acquired through experience. Plato’s theory of Forms relies on innate knowledge of perfect concepts.

天赋观念： 出生时便存在于心中的观念，并非通过经验获得。柏拉图的理型论依赖于对完美概念的天赋知识。

Tabula rasa: Latin for ‘blank slate’. Empiricists use this image to deny innate ideas, asserting that all knowledge is written by experience.

白板说（Tabula rasa）： 拉丁语“空白板”。经验主义者借此形象否定天赋观念，主张一切知识由经验书写。

---

4. Key Terms in Knowledge | 知识的关键概念

Beyond the traditional tripartite definition, Pre-U syllabuses explore Gettier problems, reliabilism and virtue epistemology. Grasping these refined concepts demonstrates a higher-level engagement with contemporary epistemology.

除传统三元定义外，Pre-U 大纲还探讨葛梯尔问题、可靠主义与德性认识论。掌握这些精细概念能展现你对当代认识论的深层理解。

Gettier case: A scenario where someone has a justified true belief that p, yet intuitively lacks knowledge because the belief is only accidentally true. Example: Smith believes ‘the man who will get the job has ten coins in his pocket’ based on justified evidence about Jones, but it is Smith himself who gets the job and coincidentally has ten coins. His belief is true and justified but not knowledge.

葛梯尔案例： 一个场景，某人拥有关于 p 的经过辩护的真信念，但直觉上却缺乏知识，因为该信念只是碰巧为真。例如，史密斯根据关于琼斯的合情证据相信“将得到工作的人口袋里有十枚硬币”，但最终是史密斯自己得到工作且碰巧有十枚硬币。他的信念为真且得到辩护，却不算知识。

Reliabilism: A theory that justifies a belief if it is produced by a reliable cognitive process, such as perception or memory. It shifts focus from internal reasons to external reliability. Think ‘reliable process’.

可靠主义： 一种理论，认为如果信念由可靠的认知过程（如感知或记忆）产生，该信念就是得到辩护的。它将焦点从内在理由转向外在可靠性。联想“可靠的流程”。

Virtue epistemology: Knowledge results from the exercise of intellectual virtues like open-mindedness, accuracy and intellectual courage. Sosa likens it to an archer’s skill: hitting the target because of ability, not luck.

德性认识论： 知识源于智识德性（如开放、严谨、智识勇气）的运用。索萨将其比作弓箭手的技艺——凭借能力而非运气命中目标。

---

5. Moral Philosophy Foundations | 道德哲学基础

Ethics examines concepts of right, wrong, good and bad. Pre-U requires clear distinctions between metaethics, normative ethics and applied ethics. Understanding these levels helps you structure essays and avoid category mistakes.

伦理学审视对错善恶等概念。Pre-U 要求清晰区分元伦理学、规范伦理学与应用伦理学。理解这些层次有助于构建论文结构并避免范畴错误。

Metaethics: The study of the nature of moral language and properties. It asks whether moral statements express truths, what ‘good’ means, and whether morality is objective or subjective.

元伦理学： 研究道德语言与道德属性的本质。它探讨道德陈述是否表达真理，“善”意味着什么，以及道德是客观的还是主观的。

Normative ethics: The branch that sets out theories of how we ought to act, offering principles such as maximizing happiness (utilitarianism) or following duty (deontology).

规范伦理学： 提出我们应如何行动的理论分支，提供诸如最大化幸福（功利主义）或遵循义务（义务论）等原则。

Applied ethics: The practical application of ethical theories to concrete issues like euthanasia, abortion and animal rights. It uses normative frameworks to guide real-world decisions.

应用伦理学： 将伦理理论实际应用于安乐死、堕胎、动物权利等具体问题。运用规范框架指导现实决策。

Moral realism: The metaethical view that moral facts exist independently of human attitudes. ‘Torture is wrong’ would be true even if everyone approved of it.

道德实在论： 元伦理学观点，认为道德事实独立于人类态度而存在。“酷刑是错的”即使人人都赞同也是真的。

---

6. Metaethics: Cognitivism vs Non-Cognitivism | 元伦理学：认知主义与非认知主义

A major metaethical divide concerns whether moral judgements are truth-apt. Cognitivists say they are beliefs that can be true or false; non-cognitivists claim they are expressions of emotion or commands. This vocabulary often appears in questions about ethical language.

元伦理学的一个主要分歧是道德判断是否具有真值。认知主义者认为它们是可真可假的信念；非认知主义者则主张它们是情感表达或命令。这套术语经常出现在关于伦理语言的考题中。

Cognitivism: The position that moral sentences express propositions with truth-values. ‘Stealing is wrong’ is a factual claim. Naturalism and non-naturalism are cognitivist varieties.

认知主义： 认为道德语句表达具有真值的命题的立场。“偷窃是错的”是一个事实主张。自然主义与非自然主义都是认知主义的变体。

Non-cognitivism: The view that moral utterances are not truth-evaluable; instead they vent feelings (emotivism) or prescribe actions (prescriptivism). Ayer’s ‘boo-hurrah’ theory is a classic emotivist account.

非认知主义： 认为道德话语不可评估真值；相反，它们宣泄情感（情感主义）或规定行动（规定主义）。艾耶尔的“呵他-万岁”理论是经典的情感主义说明。

Emotivism: ‘Stealing is wrong’ means something like ‘Stealing — boo!’ It expresses disapproval and attempts to influence others’ attitudes.

情感主义： “偷窃是错的”意为“偷窃——嘘！”，表达不赞成并试图影响他人的态度。

Prescriptivism (Hare): Moral language prescribes universalisable actions. Saying ‘You ought not to lie’ implies ‘Let no one lie in similar circumstances’. Remember ‘prescribe’ like a doctor’s prescription.

规定主义（黑尔）： 道德语言规定可普遍化的行动。“你不应当说谎”意味着“任何人在相似情形下都不要说谎”。记忆法：“规定”如同医生开处方。

---

7. Normative Ethical Theories | 规范伦理学理论

Duty-based, consequentialist and virtue-based frameworks each offer distinct accounts of moral rightness. Pre-U marks are awarded for precise use of terms like ‘maxim’, ‘eudaimonia’ and ‘utility calculus’. Here is a quick-reference breakdown.

义务论、后果论与德性伦理三种框架对道德正当性提供了不同的说明。精准使用“准则”“幸福（eudaimonia）”“功利计算”等术语能为 Pre-U 加分。以下是速查分解。

Deontology: Ethics of duty. An act is right if it conforms to moral rules, regardless of consequences. Kant’s Categorical Imperative tests maxims for universalisability and respect for persons as ends.

义务论： 义务伦理。一个行为如果符合道德规则就是对的，不论后果如何。康德的定言命令检验准则的可普遍化性与对人格目的的尊重。

Consequentialism: The moral worth of an action is determined entirely by its outcomes. The most famous form is utilitarianism, which aims at the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Use ‘consequences’ to remind yourself.

后果论： 行为的道德价值完全由其结果决定。最著名的形式是功利主义，旨在最大多数人的最大幸福。用“后果”一词提示。

Virtue ethics: Focuses on the character of the agent rather than discrete acts. Aristotle’s eudaimonia (human flourishing) is achieved by cultivating virtues like courage and temperance through the Golden Mean.

德性伦理： 关注行为者的品格，而非孤立的行为。亚里士多德的 eudaimonia（人的兴盛）通过中庸之道培养勇敢、节制等德性来实现。

Categorical imperative (First formulation): ‘Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.’ Test if a maxim can be willed without contradiction.

定言命令（第一公式）： “只依据那个你同时愿意它成为普遍法则的准则去行动。”检验一个准则是否可意愿而不自相矛盾。

---

8. Philosophy of Religion | 宗教哲学

Arguments for God’s existence and the problem of evil form the core of this unit. Terms like ‘ontological’, ‘cosmological’, ‘teleological’ and ‘theodicy’ must be differentiated clearly. Each argument has a distinct logical structure you can memorise by pattern.

上帝存在的论证与恶的问题是这一单元的核心。“本体论”“宇宙论”“目的论”与“神正论”等术语必须清晰区分。每一论证都有独特的逻辑结构，可借助模式记忆。

Ontological argument: An a priori argument that deduces God’s existence from the concept of a supremely perfect being. Anselm’s version: God is ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’. If such a being exists only in the mind, it is not the greatest, so it must exist in reality. Link ‘onto’ with ‘being’.

本体论论证： 一种先天论证，从最完美存在者的概念推导出上帝存在。安瑟伦的版本：上帝是“无法设想有比之更伟大者”。若它仅存在于心灵中，便不是最伟大的，故必须存在于现实中。将“本体”（onto）与“存在”关联。

Cosmological argument: An a posteriori argument moving from the existence of the cosmos to a first cause or necessary being. Aquinas’ First Cause argument rejects infinite regress. Visualize ‘cosmos’ → cause.

宇宙论论证： 一种后天论证，从宇宙的存在推导出第一因或必然存在者。阿奎那的第一因论证拒绝无限回溯。想象“宇宙”→原因。

Teleological argument (design): Infers an intelligent designer from the order, purpose and complexity observed in nature. Paley’s watchmaker analogy is the classic formulation. ‘Teleo’ means purpose.

目的论论证（设计论证）： 从自然界观察到的秩序、目的与复杂性推出理智设计者。佩利的钟表匠类比是经典表述。“目的”（teleo）即目的。

Theodicy: An attempt to reconcile God’s omnipotence and benevolence with the existence of evil. Irenaean theodicies centre on soul-making, while Augustinian ones stress free will and privation.

神正论： 试图调和上帝全能全善与恶的存在。爱任纽式神正论聚焦灵魂锻造，奥古斯丁式则强调自由意志与善的缺失。

---

9. Philosophy of Mind | 心灵哲学

Questions about consciousness, identity and mental states dominate the mind module. You must distinguish substance dualism, property dualism, physicalism and functionalism. The key is to remember what each theory says about the relationship between mind and brain.

关于意识、同一性与心灵状态的问题主宰着心灵哲学模块。你必须区分实体二元论、属性二元论、物理主义与功能主义。关键在于记住每种理论如何界定心灵与大脑的关系。

Substance dualism (Descartes): Mind and body are two distinct substances — res cogitans (thinking substance) and res extensa (extended substance). They interact via the pineal gland. ‘Two substances’ is the keyword.

实体二元论（笛卡尔）： 心灵与身体是两种不同的实体——思之物与广延之物。它们通过松果腺互动。关键词：“两个实体”。

Property dualism: There is only one substance (the physical brain), but it has both physical and non-physical properties. Mental properties are irreducible to physical ones. Think ‘one substance, two kinds of property’.

属性二元论： 只有一种实体（物理大脑），但它同时拥有物理属性与非物理属性。心理属性不可还原为物理属性。联想“一种实体，两类属性”。

Physicalism (identity theory): Mental states are identical to brain states. Pain just is C-fibre firing. Everything is physical. ‘Type identity’ means pain type = C-fibre-firing type.

物理主义（同一论）： 心理状态等同于大脑状态。疼痛就是 C-纤维放电。一切都是物理的。“类型同一”指疼痛类型 = C-纤维放电类型。

Functionalism: Mental states are defined by their causal roles — what inputs cause them, what other mental states they interact with, and what outputs they produce. Pain is whatever state is typically caused by bodily damage and leads to withdrawal behaviour. Remember ‘function’.

功能主义： 心理状态由因果角色定义——什么输入导致它，它与其他心理状态如何互动，以及它导致什么输出。疼痛就是那种通常由身体损伤引起并导致退缩行为的状态。记住“功能”。

---

10. Free Will and Determinism | 自由意志与决定论

The free will debate examines whether human actions are determined by prior causes. Compatibilism, incompatibilism and libertarianism are nuanced positions that require precise definition. Highlighting the ‘compatible’ part of compatibilism makes the term self-explanatory.

自由意志争论探讨人类行动是否被先行原因所决定。相容论、不相容论与自由意志论是需要精确定义的细致立场。强调“相容”二字让该术语不言自明。

Determinism: The thesis that every event, including human choices, is necessitated by antecedent causes and laws of nature. If determinism is true, the future is as fixed as the past.

决定论： 认为每一个事件，包括人类选择，都被先行原因和自然律所必然决定的论题。如果决定论为真，未来就如同过去一样固定。

Compatibilism (soft determinism): Free will and determinism are compatible. An act is free if it flows from one’s own desires and intentions without external coercion, even if those desires are themselves determined. Key: ‘compatible’ = can coexist.

相容论（温和决定论）： 自由意志与决定论可以相容。一个行为如果源于个人自己的欲望和意图且无外部威逼，那它就是自由的，即使这些欲望本身是被决定的。关键：“相容”= 可共存。

Libertarianism: Free will requires genuine indeterminism. Agents have the ability to do otherwise in exactly the same circumstances. This position denies determinism and asserts agent-causation. Not the political theory.

自由意志论（Libertarianism）： 自由意志要求真正的非决定性。行动者在完全相同的环境下有能力做出不同选择。这一立场否定决定论并主张行动者因果性。不是政治理论。

Hard determinism: Determinism is true, and free will is an illusion. Since all actions are causally determined, moral responsibility is called into question. ‘Hard’ = no compromise.

强硬决定论： 决定论为真，自由意志是幻觉。由于所有行动都被因果决定，道德责任受到质疑。“强硬”表示不妥协。

---

11. Logical and Argumentative Terms | 逻辑与论证术语

Philosophy papers demand rigorous analysis of arguments. You need to identify premises, conclusions, validity and soundness. Symbolic notation often appears, so becoming comfortable with basic logical operators speeds up note-taking.

哲学试卷要求对论证进行严格分析。你需要识别前提、结论、有效性与可靠性。符号标记经常出现，因此熟悉基本逻辑运算符能加快笔记速度。

Validity: An argument is valid if, assuming the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Validity concerns the form, not the actual truth. Example: All A are B; x is A; therefore x is B. The if-then structure is what matters.

有效性： 如果一个论证假设前提为真则结论必为真，该论证就是有效的。有效关乎形式，而非实际真值。例如：所有 A 是 B；x 是 A；故 x 是 B。关键在于“如果-那么”结构。

Soundness: A sound argument is valid and has all true premises. Soundness guarantees a true conclusion. ‘Sound = valid + true premises’ is the equation to memorise.

可靠性： 一个可靠论证既有效又具有全部真前提。可靠性确保结论为真。记住公式：“可靠 = 有效 + 真前提”。

Inductive argument: The premises provide probabilistic support for the conclusion. Even if true, the conclusion is not guaranteed. All swans observed are white, therefore all swans are white — made probable, not certain. ‘Inductive = increase probability’.

归纳论证： 前提为结论提供概率性支持。即使前提为真，结论也不被保证。所有观察到的天鹅都是白的，故所有天鹅都是白的——这是概率性的，并不确定。记忆：“归纳”可联想“归纳出可能性”。

Logical operators (Unicode): ¬ for negation (not), ∧ for conjunction (and), ∨ for disjunction (or), → for material implication (if… then), ↔ for biconditional (if and only if). Writing ‘p → q’ helps compress premises quickly.

逻辑运算符（Unicode）： ¬ 表示否定（非），∧ 合取（且），∨ 析取（或），→ 实质蕴涵（若…则），↔ 双条件（当且仅当）。书写“p → q”可快速压缩前提。

Modus ponens: If p then q; p; therefore q. A valid deductive form. Recognise it when a philosopher presents a conditional and affirms the antecedent.

Published by TutorHao | Pre-U 哲学 Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）