IGCSE WJEC Law: Unit Test Mock Paper Walkthrough | IGCSE WJEC 法律：单元测试模拟卷解析

📚 IGCSE WJEC Law: Unit Test Mock Paper Walkthrough | IGCSE WJEC 法律：单元测试模拟卷解析

This walkthrough breaks down a WJEC-style IGCSE Law unit test into its key question types. It explains what examiners expect, shows model answers for law application questions, and highlights the precise legal vocabulary you need to use.

本解析将一套 WJEC 风格的 IGCSE 法律单元测试拆解为若干关键题型，说明考官期望，展示法律应用题型的模范答案，并强调你必须使用的准确法律术语。

1. Mock Paper Overview | 模拟卷概览

This mock paper is designed to mirror the WJEC IGCSE Law unit test format. It contains three sections: Section A has ten multiple-choice questions, Section B has short-answer definition and explanation questions, and Section C requires one extended evaluation response. The total mark is 60, and you should spend about 50 minutes on Sections A and B combined, leaving 25 minutes for Section C.

本模拟卷旨在对应 WJEC IGCSE 法律单元测试的格式。试卷包含三个部分：A 部分有 10 道选择题，B 部分为简答定义与解释题，C 部分要求完成一道扩展评价题。全卷总分 60 分，你应大约用 50 分钟完成 A、B 两部分，留出 25 分钟完成 C 部分。

The topics tested include sources of law, criminal liability, non-fatal offences, negligence, contract formation, legal personnel, and sentencing. Examiners reward precise legal terminology, case names, and application to the facts rather than general common-sense answers.

考查的主题包括法律渊源、刑事责任、非致命侵害罪、过失侵权、合同成立、法律职业人员和量刑。考官奖励准确的法律术语、案例名称以及对案件事实的应用，而不是泛泛的常识性回答。

2. Question 1: Sources of Law | 第 1 题：法律渊源

A typical question asks: “Which of the following is a primary source of law in England and Wales?” The correct answer is a statute, such as an Act of Parliament. Textbooks, law review articles, and newspaper reports are secondary sources because they describe or comment on the law rather than create it.

典型问题是：”以下哪一项是英格兰和威尔士法律的主要渊源？” 正确答案是成文法，例如议会法案。教科书、法律评论文章和报纸报道属于次要渊源，因为它们描述或评论法律，而不创设法律。

A second question may test judicial precedent. Precedent operates through the doctrine of stare decisis, which means “stand by what has been decided”. When a higher court makes a decision, its ratio decidendi binds lower courts in later cases with similar facts.

第二题可能考查司法先例。先例通过遵循先例原则运作，意为”遵从已决之事”。当上级法院作出判决时，其判决理由约束下级法院在之后事实相似的案件中的裁判。

Examiners often expect you to distinguish ratio decidendi from obiter dicta. The ratio is the legal reason for the decision and is binding; obiter dicta are comments made “by the way” and are only persuasive. Using these Latin terms accurately earns easy marks.

考官通常希望你区分判决理由与附带意见。判决理由是作出裁判的法律依据，具有约束力；附带意见是”顺带”发表的评论，仅具有说服力。准确使用这些拉丁术语可以轻松得分。

3. Question 2: Criminal Liability – Actus Reus and Mens Rea | 第 2 题：刑事责任——犯罪行为与犯罪意图

A short-answer question might state: “Define actus reus and mens rea and give one example of each.” The actus reus is the guilty act, such as taking property without consent in theft, while mens rea is the guilty mind, such as dishonesty or intention to permanently deprive.

简答题可能会这样出：”定义犯罪行为和犯罪意图，并各举一例。” 犯罪行为是违法行为，例如盗窃中未经同意拿走财产；犯罪意图是犯罪心理，例如不诚实或永久剥夺他人财产的意图。

The general rule is that both elements must exist at the same time. This is known as the coincidence of actus reus and mens rea. For example, if Dan decides to harm Pat after accidentally knocking him over, the required mens rea may be absent at the moment of the actus reus unless a continuing act applies.

一般规则是两要素必须同时存在，这被称为犯罪行为与犯罪意图的同时发生。例如，如果丹在不小心撞倒帕特之后才决定伤害他，那么在犯罪行为发生时可能缺乏所需的犯罪意图，除非适用持续行为原则。

For strict liability offences, only the actus reus is required. Common examples include many regulatory offences, such as selling food past its use-by date, where the prosecution does not need to prove fault or intention.

对于严格责任犯罪，只需证明犯罪行为。常见例子包括许多监管性犯罪，例如销售超过保质期的食品，控方无需证明过错或意图。

4. Question 3: Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person | 第 3 题：非致命侵害罪

A common question requires you to distinguish assault from battery. Assault is committed when the defendant intentionally or recklessly causes the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force. No physical contact is needed. Battery is the actual application of unlawful force, such as pushing or hitting.

常见题目要求区分企图伤害与殴打。企图伤害是指被告故意或轻率地使被害人担心即将遭受非法暴力，不需要实际身体接触。殴打则是实际施加非法暴力，例如推搡或击打。

Higher-level questions may ask about actual bodily harm under section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. An assault or battery that causes injury, such as cuts or bruises, can be charged as ABH. The mens rea is the same as for assault or battery; no extra intent to cause injury is required.

较高级的题目可能考查 1861 年《侵害人身罪法》第 47 条下的实际身体伤害。造成伤害（如割伤或瘀伤）的企图伤害或殴打可被控为实际身体伤害。其犯罪意图与企图伤害或殴打相同，无需额外证明造成伤害的意图。

For section 20 GBH, the defendant must intend or foresee some harm, though not necessarily serious harm. For section 18 GBH with intent, the prosecution must prove specific intent to cause grievous bodily harm or resist arrest. These distinctions are frequently tested.

对于第 20 条的重伤害，被告必须意图或预见到某种伤害，但不一定是严重伤害。对于第 18 条的故意重伤害，控方必须证明造成严重身体伤害或抗拒逮捕的特定意图。这些区别经常被考查。

5. Question 4: Tort of Negligence – Duty, Breach, Damage | 第 4 题：过失侵权——义务、违反与损害

A typical negligence question asks about the neighbour principle from Donoghue v Stevenson. Lord Atkin said you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that you can reasonably foresee would injure your neighbour. In law, your neighbour is anyone closely and directly affected by your actions.

典型的过失侵权题会考查 Donoghue v Stevenson 案中的邻人原则。阿特金勋爵指出，你必须采取合理注意，避免你可以合理预见的作为或不作为伤害你的邻人。在法律上，你的邻人是指任何受到你行为密切和直接影响的人。

To succeed in negligence, a claimant must prove three elements: duty of care, breach of that duty, and damage caused by the breach.

Published by TutorHao | IGCSE 法律 Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）