📚 IB Mathematics: Common Sampling Methods and Their Applications | IB数学：常用抽样方法及其适用场景
Selecting a sample is one of the most critical steps in statistical investigation. In IB Mathematics, students must understand both the mechanics of each sampling method and the real-world situations in which each method is appropriate. This article provides a concise yet rigorous guide to the common sampling methods, including their definitions, procedures, advantages, limitations, and typical exam contexts.
抽样是统计调查中最关键的步骤之一。在IB数学课程中，学生不仅需要掌握每种抽样方法的操作过程，还要理解每种方法适用于哪些现实场景。本文将系统介绍常用抽样方法的定义、实施步骤、优点、局限性和典型考试情境。
1. Why Sampling Matters | 为什么要抽样
A population is the entire set of individuals or objects of interest, while a sample is a subset selected from that population. Sampling is necessary when testing every member of a population is too costly, too time-consuming, or even impossible. For example, quality-control testing of light bulbs often destroys the product, so only a sample can be tested.
总体（population）是研究者感兴趣的全体个体或对象的集合，而样本（sample）是从总体中选取的一部分个体。当对总体中每一个成员进行测试成本过高、耗时过长，甚至不可能时，抽样就显得十分必要。例如，灯泡的质量检测往往会破坏产品，因此只能对样本进行测试。
A good sample should be representative of the population so that conclusions drawn from the sample can be generalized. In IB Mathematics, you are often asked to identify the population, the sample, and the sampling method, as well as to evaluate whether bias is present.
好的样本应当能够代表总体，从而使从样本得出的结论可以推广到总体。在IB数学中，你经常需要识别总体、样本和抽样方法，并判断样本是否存在偏差。
2. Simple Random Sampling | 简单随机抽样
Simple random sampling is a method in which every member of the population has an equal and independent chance of being selected. This is often implemented by assigning each member a number and using a random number generator, a random number table, or drawing names from a hat.
简单随机抽样是指总体中的每一个成员被选中的概率相等且相互独立的抽样方法。通常的做法是为每个成员分配一个编号，然后使用随机数生成器、随机数表或抽签方式选取。
Example: A school has 800 students. To choose 40 students for a survey, assign each student a number from 001 to 800, then use a random number generator to obtain 40 unique numbers.
示例：某学校有800名学生。为了问卷调查抽取40名学生，可为每名学生分配001至800的编号，然后用随机数生成器产生40个不重复的编号。
Advantages: Simple to understand and free from selection bias, as long as the randomness is truly maintained. Limitations: It requires a complete list of the population (a sampling frame), and it is impractical for very large or geographically dispersed populations.
优点：易于理解，并且在真正保持随机性的情况下没有选择偏差。局限：需要一份完整的总体名单（抽样框），对于非常大或地理上分散的总体而言并不现实。
3. Systematic Sampling | 系统抽样
Systematic sampling involves selecting every k-th member from an ordered list of the population, where k is calculated by dividing the population size by the desired sample size. For example, if you need 100 people from a list of 2000, then k = 20, and you randomly choose a starting point between 1 and 20, then select every 20th person thereafter.
系统抽样是从按某种顺序排列的总体名单中每隔 k 个成员选取一个的方法，其中 k 等于总体规模除以所需样本量。例如，若需要从2000人的名单中抽取100人，则 k = 20，先在1到20之间随机选择一个起点，之后每隔20人选取一个。
Advantages: Simpler and faster than simple random sampling, and does not require a full list of random numbers. Limitations: It can introduce bias if the list has a periodic pattern that coincides with the sampling interval. For instance, if every 10th item in a production line is defective due to a machine cycle, systematic sampling may over- or under-represent defective items.
优点：比简单随机抽样更简单快捷，且无需生成大量随机数。局限：如果名单存在与抽样间隔重合的周期性规律，则可能引入偏差。例如，生产线上每第10个产品因机器循环而存在缺陷，系统抽样可能会高估或低估缺陷品的比例。
4. Stratified Sampling | 分层抽样
Stratified sampling divides the population into distinct subgroups, called strata, based on a relevant characteristic (e.g., age, gender, grade level). A random sample is then taken from each stratum in proportion to the stratum’s size in the population. This ensures that each subgroup is represented in the sample in the same proportion as in the population.
分层抽样是根据相关特征（如年龄、性别、年级）将总体划分为若干互不重叠的子群体，称为层（strata），然后按各层在总体中所占比例从每一层中随机抽取样本。这样可以确保样本中各子群体的比例与总体中的比例一致。
Formula for proportional allocation: sample size from stratum = (stratum size / population size) × total sample size.
按比例分配的公式：某层抽取数量 = （该层大小 / 总体大小）× 总样本量。
n ₛ = (N ₛ / N) × n
Advantages: Guarantees representation of all subgroups and often produces more precise estimates with lower sampling error. Limitations: Requires detailed information about the population structure and can be time-consuming to organize.
优点：确保所有子群体都能得到代表，通常能获得更精确的估计和更小的抽样误差。局限：需要关于总体结构的详细信息，且组织实施较为耗时。
5. Cluster Sampling | 整群抽样
Cluster sampling partitions the population into naturally occurring groups, or clusters, such as schools, villages, or city blocks. A random sample of clusters is chosen, and then either all members of the selected clusters are included (one-stage cluster sampling) or a random sample is taken from each selected cluster (two-stage cluster sampling).
整群抽样是将总体划分为自然存在的群体，称为群（clusters），例如学校、村庄或街区。先随机抽取若干个群，然后要么包含所选群中的所有成员（单阶段整群抽样），要么从每个选中的群中再随机抽取一定成员（两阶段整群抽样）。
Advantages: Highly practical when a complete population list is unavailable but a list of clusters is easy to obtain, and it reduces travel costs for geographically spread populations. Limitations: Clusters may be internally similar and externally different, leading to less precise results; the sample may be less representative than stratified sampling.
优点：当无法获得完整总体名单但容易获得群名单时非常实用，对于地理分布广泛的总体可降低调查成本。局限：群内成员可能高度相似而群间差异大，从而导致精度下降；样本代表性可能不如分层抽样。
6. Quota Sampling | 配额抽样
Quota sampling is a non-random method in which the population is divided into subgroups, and interviewers select a predetermined number (quota) of individuals from each subgroup, often based on convenience. The selection of individuals within each quota is left to the interviewer rather than determined by random procedures.
配额抽样是一种非随机抽样方法，将总体划分为若干子群体，调查员从每个子群体中按预定数量（配额）选取个体，选择通常基于便利性。每个配额内具体选择哪些个体由调查员自行决定，而非通过随机程序确定。
Advantages: Faster, cheaper, and easier to administer than random sampling methods. Limitations: Prone to interviewer bias, and it is not possible to quantify sampling error because probabilities of selection are unknown.
优点：比随机抽样方法更快、更便宜、更易实施。局限：容易受到调查员主观偏差的影响，且由于每个个体被选中的概率未知，无法量化抽样误差。
7. Convenience Sampling | 便利抽样
Convenience sampling, also known as opportunity sampling, involves selecting members of the population who are easiest to reach. Examples include interviewing shoppers in a mall or surveying classmates in the school cafeteria.
便利抽样，又称机会抽样，是指选择总体中最容易接触到的成员作为样本。例如在商场里随机采访购物者，或在学校食堂里调查同学。
Advantages: Extremely quick, inexpensive, and requires minimal preparation. Limitations: This method produces highly biased samples because the individuals available may not be representative of the entire population. It is generally only acceptable for exploratory or preliminary studies.
优点：极为快速、成本低，且几乎不需要前期准备。局限：由于可接触到的个体未必能代表整个总体，这种方法产生的样本偏差很大，通常仅适用于探索性或初步研究。
8. Self-Selected Sampling | 自愿抽样
Self-selected sampling, also called voluntary response sampling, occurs when individuals decide on their own to participate in a survey. This often happens with online polls, telephone call-in surveys, or feedback forms.
自愿抽样，又称自愿回应抽样，是指个体自行决定是否参与调查的一种方法。常见于网络投票、电话热线调查或反馈表单。
Advantages: Easy to set up and particularly useful when the population is hard to identify or contact. Limitations: Severe bias is likely because people with strong opinions—whether positive or negative—are more likely to volunteer, leading to results that do not reflect the general population.
优点：设置简单，在总体难以识别或联系时尤为有用。局限：由于有强烈意见（无论是正面还是负面）的人更愿意参与，结果往往无法反映整体人群，极易产生严重偏差。
9. Judgement Sampling | 判断抽样
Judgement sampling is a non-random method in which the researcher uses their expertise to select individuals who are believed to be most representative or informative for the study. This technique is often used in exploratory research, expert surveys, and policy studies.
判断抽样是一种非随机抽样方法，研究者根据自身专业经验选择他们认为最具代表性或信息量最大的个体。该技术常用于探索性研究、专家调查和政策研究。
Advantages: Useful when the sample is very small and in-depth knowledge is required; it can produce insightful results. Limitations: The validity of the results depends entirely on the researcher’s judgement and is therefore highly subjective; the risk of systematic bias is high, and no statistical measure of sampling error can be computed.
优点：在样本量很小且需要深入研究时很有用，可能产生富有洞察力的结果。局限：结果的有效性完全取决于研究者的判断，因而主观性极强；系统性偏差风险高，且无法计算抽样误差的统计度量。
10. Comparing the Methods | 各方法比较
The table below summarizes the key features of the sampling methods discussed. In IB exam questions, you should be able to classify a described sampling procedure, justify whether it is biased, and recommend the most appropriate method for a given scenario.
下表总结了所讨论抽样方法的关键特征。在IB考试题中，你需要能够对描述的抽样过程进行分类、判断其是否有偏，并为给定情境推荐最合适的抽样方法。
| Method | 方法 | Random? 随机? | Requires Population List 需要总体名单? | Bias Risk 偏差风险 | Typical Use 典型用途 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Random 简单随机 | Yes 是 | Yes 需要 | Low 低 | Small, accessible populations 规模小、易获取的总体 |
| Systematic 系统 | Yes after start 起点后随机 | Yes 需要 | Low to medium 低至中 | Ordered lists such as production lines 有序名单，如生产线 |
| Stratified 分层 | Yes within strata 层内随机 | Yes, with group data 需要且需分组信息 | Low 低 | Heterogeneous populations with known subgroups 存在已知子群体的异质总体 |
| Cluster 整群 | Yes 是 | List of clusters only 仅需群名单 | Medium 中 | Large, geographically spread populations 大规模、地理分散的总体 |
| Quota 配额 | No 否 | No 不需要 | Medium to high 中至高 | Market research 市场调研 |
| Convenience 便利 | No 否 | No 不需要 | High 高 | Pilot studies 预研究 |
| Self-selected 自愿 | No 否 | No 不需要 | High 高 | Online polls, opinion surveys 网络投票、舆情调查 |
11. Sampling Bias and Its Sources | 抽样偏差及其来源
Sampling bias occurs when the sample is not representative of the population, causing systematic errors in estimates. Common sources include non-response bias (certain groups do not respond), selection bias (some members have no chance of being selected), and undercoverage (parts of the population are missing from the sampling frame).
抽样偏差是指样本不能代表总体，从而导致估计值出现系统性误差的情形。常见来源包括无回应偏差（某些群体不回复）、选择偏差（某些成员根本没有机会被选中）以及覆盖不足（总体中的部分成员在抽样框中缺失）。
For example, a telephone survey under-covers households without landline phones, and an online survey excludes people without internet access. In both cases, the resulting samples are biased and cannot reliably represent the whole population.
例如，电话调查会遗漏没有固定电话的家庭，网络调查则会排除无法上网的人群。在这两种情况下，所得到的样本都存在偏差，无法可靠地代表整个总体。
12. How to Choose the Right Method in IB Exam Questions | 如何在IB考试题中选择合适的方法
In exam problems, first read the scenario carefully and identify whether a complete sampling frame exists, whether subgroups are relevant, and whether cost and time constraints are mentioned. If the population is easily listed and small, simple random sampling is appropriate; if subgroups must be proportionally represented, use stratified sampling; if the population is dispersed and no full list exists, cluster sampling is preferable.
在考试题目中，首先仔细阅读情境，判断是否存在完整抽样框、子群体是否重要、是否提到了成本与时间限制。如果总体容易列出且规模较小，适合采用简单随机抽样；如果必须按比例代表子群体，则应使用分层抽样；如果总体分布分散且没有完整名单，则整群抽样更合适。
If the question mentions convenience or voluntary participation, state clearly that the method is non-random and likely to be biased, and explain what makes it biased. Always justify your recommendation with reference to the specific details of the question.
如果题目提到便利性或自愿参与，应明确指出该方法是非随机且可能有偏的，并解释偏差产生的原因。始终结合题目中的具体细节来论证你的推荐理由。
Published by TutorHao | Mathematics Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
屏轩国际教育cambridge primary/secondary checkpoint, cat4, ukiset,ukcat,igcse,alevel,PAT,STEP,MAT, ibdp,ap,ssat,sat,sat2课程辅导，国外大学本科硕士研究生博士课程论文辅导