Year 12 AQA Law: Essential Terminology Quick-Memorisation Guide | Year 12 AQA 法律：核心术语速记指南

📚 Year 12 AQA Law: Essential Terminology Quick-Memorisation Guide | Year 12 AQA 法律：核心术语速记指南

Mastering legal vocabulary is the foundation of success in AQA A-level Law. Without a firm grasp of key terms, you will struggle to apply the law to scenarios and to write precise essays. This guide breaks down the most important terminology from the English legal system, criminal law, and tort law, pairing each concept with clear explanations in both English and Chinese. Use the tables, memory hacks, and paired paragraphs to speed up your revision and ensure you can recall each term accurately under exam pressure.

掌握法律词汇是 AQA A-level 法律取得成功的基础。如果对关键术语没有牢固的掌握，你将难以将法律应用于场景分析，也难以写出准确的小论文。本指南将英国法律体系、刑法和侵权法中最核心的术语拆解开来，并为每个概念配以清晰的中英文解释。利用表格、记忆技巧以及中英对照段落来加速你的复习，确保你在考试压力下能够准确回忆起每一个术语。

---

1. The Building Blocks: Law and Legal System | 法律基石：法律与法律体系

Before diving into specific areas, you must be comfortable with the foundational vocabulary that describes the nature of law and the structure of the English legal system.

在深入学习具体领域之前，你必须熟练掌握描述法律本质和英国法律体系结构的基础词汇。

Rule of law – the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced.	法治 – 所有人和机构都受到公平适用和执行的法律的约束并对其负责的原则。
Separation of powers – the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches (legislature, executive, judiciary) to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.	三权分立 – 将政府职责划分为立法、行政和司法三个独立分支，以限制任一分支行使另一分支的核心职能。
Parliamentary sovereignty – the doctrine that Parliament is the supreme legal authority, which can create or end any law.	议会主权 – 议会是最高法律权威，可以制定或废除任何法律的学说。
Common law – law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals, as opposed to statutes adopted through the legislative process.	普通法 – 由法官通过法院和类似法庭的判决发展而来的法律，区别于通过立法程序通过的法令。
Civil law (in the context of the English system) – the system of law concerned with private relations between members of a community, as distinct from criminal proceedings.	民法（在英国体系背景下）– 涉及社会成员之间私人关系的法律制度，区别于刑事诉讼。

---

2. Sources of Law: Parliament and the Courts | 法律渊源：议会与法院

The two main sources of law you need to know are Acts of Parliament (statute law) and judicial precedent (case law). Each generates its own set of terms.

你需要了解的两个主要法律渊源是议会法案（成文法）和司法先例（判例法）。它们各自产生了一套术语。

Primary legislation – Acts of Parliament that have been passed by the House of Commons and the House of Lords and received Royal Assent.	一级法例 – 已由下议院和上议院通过并获得御准的议会法案。
Secondary (delegated) legislation – law made by a person or body to whom Parliament has delegated law-making power, such as a Minister through a statutory instrument.	二级（授权）立法 – 由获得议会授权的个人或机构制定的法律，例如部长通过法定文件制定。
Judicial precedent – the process by which judges follow the decisions of previous courts in cases with similar facts; also known as stare decisis (‘stand by what has been decided’).	司法先例 – 法官在相似事实案件中遵循先前法院判决的过程；也称为 stare decisis（‘遵照已决事项’）。
Ratio decidendi – the legal principle or reason for the decision that is binding on lower courts.	判决理由 – 对下级法院具有约束力的法律原则或判决理由。
Obiter dicta – statements made by a judge that are not essential to the decision and are not binding, but may be persuasive.	附带意见 – 法官所作并非判决必需的陈述，不具约束力，但可能具有说服力。
Statutory interpretation – the process by which judges interpret legislation. The main rules are the literal rule, the golden rule, the mischief rule, and the purposive approach.	法例解释 – 法官解释立法的过程。主要规则包括文义规则、黄金规则、缺陷规则和目的解释法。

---

3. The Court Hierarchy and Legal Personnel | 法院层级与法律人员

Understanding the court structure is essential because it determines which decisions are binding. You also need to distinguish between the different legal professionals involved in a case.

理解法院结构至关重要，因为它决定了哪些判决具有约束力。你还需要区分案件中涉及的不同法律专业人员。

The court hierarchy for criminal cases begins with the Magistrates’ Court and the Crown Court, and appeals go to the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and finally the Supreme Court. For civil cases, the County Court and the High Court feed into the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) and the Supreme Court. Barristers have rights of audience in all courts and often specialise in advocacy, while solicitors provide legal advice and prepare cases. Judges make decisions on points of law, and juries decide questions of fact in Crown Court trials.

刑事案件的法院层级从治安法院和刑事法院开始，上诉则到上诉法院（刑事庭），最终到最高法院。民事案件则由郡法院和高等法院向上诉法院（民事庭）和最高法院上诉。大律师在所有法院都享有出庭发言权，并且通常专攻辩护工作，而事务律师则提供法律咨询并准备案件。法官就法律问题作出裁决，陪审团在刑事法院审判中就事实问题作出决定。

---

4. Criminal Law: Actus Reus and Causation | 刑法：犯罪行为与因果关系

Every criminal offence, unless it is one of strict liability, requires both the guilty act (actus reus) and the guilty mind (mens rea). Start by memorising the actus reus terms.

每一刑事犯罪，除非属于严格责任犯罪，都需要具备犯罪行为（actus reus）和犯罪意图（mens rea）。先从记忆犯罪行为相关术语开始。

Actus reus – the physical element of a crime. It can be an act, an omission (in certain circumstances), or a ‘state of affairs’.	犯罪行为 – 犯罪的客观要素。它可以是作为、不作为（在某些情况下）或‘状态’。
Omissions – failure to act when there is a legal duty to do so. Duties arise from statute, contract, a special relationship, the voluntary assumption of responsibility, or the creation of a dangerous situation.	不作为 – 在有法律义务采取行动时却未采取行动。义务可产生于法令、合同、特殊关系、自愿承担责任或制造了危险情形。
Causation – the link between the defendant’s conduct and the result. It has two parts: factual causation (‘but for’ test) and legal causation (the defendant’s act must be a more than minimal cause, and there must be no intervening act that breaks the chain of causation).	因果关系 – 被告行为与结果之间的联系。包括两部分：事实因果关系（‘若非’标准）和法律因果关系（被告行为必须是超出最低限度的原因，且不得有介入行为打断因果关系链条）。
Chain of causation – the direct link from the defendant’s act to the consequence. It can be broken by a novus actus interveniens (new intervening act) such as an unforeseeable act of a third party or a victim’s own free will.	因果关系链条 – 从被告行为到后果的直接联系。它可因新介入行为（如第三人不可预见的行为或受害人自愿行为）而中断。

---

5. Criminal Law: Mens Rea and Strict Liability | 刑法：犯罪意图与严格责任

Mens rea is the mental element of a crime. The level required varies by offence, from intention to negligence. Strict liability offences are an exception, where no mens rea is needed.

犯罪意图是犯罪的主观要素。所需的程度因犯罪不同，从意图到过失不等。严格责任犯罪是例外，不需要犯罪意图。

Direct intention – the defendant’s purpose or aim to bring about a prohibited consequence.	直接故意 – 被告的目标或目的是造成被禁止的后果。
Oblique (indirect) intention – the defendant did not necessarily desire the consequence, but it was a virtually certain result of their actions and they appreciated this (as per R v Woollin).	间接故意 – 被告不一定追求该后果，但该后果是其行为实际上确定会发生的结果，且被告认识到这一点（依据 R v Woollin 案）。
Recklessness – the defendant foresees a risk of the prohibited consequence and unreasonably takes that risk (subjective test following R v G).	轻率 – 被告预见到存在被禁止后果的风险，却不合理地冒此风险（根据 R v G 案采用主观标准）。
Negligence – the defendant’s conduct falls below the standard of a reasonable person, without necessarily foresight of the risk. Used in gross negligence manslaughter.	过失 – 被告行为低于合理人的标准，不一定预见到风险。用于重大过失非预谋杀人。
Strict liability – offences where liability is imposed regardless of mens rea. Only the actus reus needs to be proved. They are usually regulatory in nature (e.g., food safety, pollution).	严格责任 – 不论犯罪意图如何即施加责任的犯罪。只需证明犯罪行为成立。通常是监管性质的（如食品安全、污染）。

---

6. Criminal Defences: A Quick Reference | 刑事抗辩快速参考

Defences can negate the actus reus, negate the mens rea, or provide a justification or excuse. Knowing the exact terminology helps you apply them accurately.

抗辩理由可以否定犯罪行为、否定犯罪意图，或提供正当理由或宽宥。了解准确术语有助于你准确适用。

Insanity – the defendant must prove that, due to a disease of the mind, they did not know the nature and quality of the act or that what they were doing was wrong (M’Naghten Rules).	精神错乱 – 被告必须证明，因精神疾病，他们不知道行为的性质和特质，或不知道所做是错误的（麦纳顿规则）。
Automatism – the defendant acted involuntarily due to an external factor (e.g., a blow to the head, medication). If caused by an internal factor, it is insanity.	身体失控 – 被告由于外部因素（如头部被击打、药物）导致行为非自愿。若由内在因素引起，则属精神错乱。
Intoxication – voluntary intoxication can be a defence to crimes of specific intent if it prevents the defendant forming the required mens rea, but not to crimes of basic intent. Involuntary intoxication is a full defence if mens rea is absent.	醉酒 – 自愿醉酒可作为特定意图犯罪的抗辩，若其阻碍被告形成所需犯罪意图，但对基本意图犯罪不成立。非自愿醉酒且无犯罪意图时，为完全抗辩。
Self-defence / prevention of crime – the defendant may use reasonable force to protect themselves, another person, or property, or to prevent a crime. The force must be necessary and proportionate.	自卫 / 制止犯罪 – 被告可使用合理武力保护自己、他人或财产，或制止犯罪。武力必须必要且合乎比例。
Duress – the defendant was forced to commit a crime by threats of death or serious bodily injury. Not available for murder or some treason offences.	胁迫 – 被告因受到死亡或严重身体伤害的威胁而被迫犯罪。不适用于谋杀及某些叛国罪。

---

7. Tort Law: Negligence and Duty of Care | 侵权法：过失与注意义务

Negligence is the largest tort topic at Year 12. To establish negligence, the claimant must prove: duty of care, breach of that duty, and damage caused by the breach.

过失是 Year 12 中最大的侵权法主题。要成立过失，原告必须证明：注意义务、违反该义务，以及由违反造成的损害。

Duty of care – the legal obligation to take reasonable care not to harm others. Established by the Caparo three-part test: foreseeability of damage, proximity between the parties, and whether it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty.	注意义务 – 采取合理注意不伤害他人的法律义务。由 Caparo 三部分标准确立：损害的可预见性、双方间的近邻关系，以及施加义务是否公平、公正和合理。
Breach of duty – the defendant fell below the standard of the ‘reasonable person’. The court considers factors such as likelihood of harm, seriousness of the risk, practicality of precautions, and any social utility of the defendant’s conduct.	违反义务 – 被告低于‘合理人’标准。法庭会考虑损害可能性、风险严重性、采取预防措施的可行性，以及被告行为的社会效用等因素。
Standard of care – the level of care a reasonable person would exercise in the circumstances. Professionals are judged by the standard of a reasonably competent member of that profession (Bolam test). Learners are judged by the standard of a reasonably competent driver.	注意标准 – 一个合理人在该情境下会采取的注意程度。专业人士以该行业合理称职成员的标准来评判（Bolam 标准）。学习者以合理称职驾驶员的标准评判。

---

8. Tort Law: Damage, Causation and Defences | 侵权法：损害、因果关系与抗辩

After establishing duty and breach, the claimant must prove causation and damage. Tort law also offers several specific defences.

在确立了义务和违反义务后，原告必须证明因果关系和损害。侵权法也提供若干专门的抗辩。

Factual causation – the ‘but for’ test: but for the defendant’s breach, would the claimant have suffered the loss? If the loss would have occurred anyway, the breach is not the cause.	事实因果关系 – ‘若非’标准：若非被告的违反，原告是否会遭受损失？若损失无论如何都会发生，则违反不是原因。
Remoteness of damage – the damage must not be too remote. Under The Wagon Mound, the defendant is liable only for damage that was reasonably foreseeable.	损害的遥远性 – 损害不能太遥远。根据 The Wagon Mound 案，被告仅对可合理预见的损害负责。
Thin skull rule – the defendant must take the victim as they find them. Even if the claimant suffers unusually severe injury due to a pre-existing condition, the defendant is liable for all the damage.	薄颅骨规则 – 被告必须接受被害人的特质。即使原告因自身原有状况遭受异常严重的伤害，被告仍需对所有损害负责。
Contributory negligence – a partial defence where the claimant’s own carelessness contributed to their injuries. Damages are reduced by a percentage to reflect the claimant’s share of the blame.	共同过失 – 部分抗辩，指原告自身的疏忽促成了其伤害。赔偿额按比例减少以反映原告的责任份额。
Volenti non fit injuria – (consent) the full defence that the claimant voluntarily accepted the risk of harm, with full knowledge of the nature and extent of the risk.	同意（Volenti non fit injuria） – 完全抗辩，指原告在完全了解风险性质和程度的情况下自愿接受了伤害风险。

---

9. Memory Hacks: Acronyms and Sound-alikes for Law Terms | 记忆诀窍：法律术语的首字母缩略词与谐音联想

Many legal concepts can be grouped into memorable acronyms. Using these as quick triggers will help you recall entire frameworks in an exam.

许多法律概念可以归纳为易于记忆的首字母缩略词。在考试中利用它们作为快速触发器，能帮助你回忆起整个框架。

For actus reus and omissions duties, remember ‘SCARF’: Statutory duty, Contractual duty, Assumed responsibility, Relationship duty, and Failure to correct a danger you created. For the Caparo three-part test, use ‘FPR’: Foreseeability, Proximity, and Reasonable to impose. For the rules of statutory interpretation, think ‘GLMP’: Golden rule, Literal rule, Mischief rule, Purposive approach. To distinguish the two types of intention, link ‘Oblique’ with ‘O’ for ‘Outcome virtually certain’.

针对犯罪行为和不作为义务，记住‘SCARF’：

Published by TutorHao | Year 12 法律 Revision Series | aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）